Jump to content

International Standard Classification of Occupations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Job title)

The International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO) is a system developed by the International Labour Organization (ILO) to classify and organize occupations into a structured hierarchy. It serves as a reference framework for national statistical agencies, labor market analysts, and international organizations to standardize job classifications across countries and time periods.

The ILO describes the purpose of the ISCO as:[1]

seek[ing] to facilitate international communication about occupations by providing statisticians with a framework to make internationally comparable occupational data available, and by allowing international occupational data to be produced in a form that can be useful for research as well as for specific decision-making and action-oriented activities.

According to the ILO, a job is defined as "a set of tasks and duties performed, or meant to be performed, by one person, including for an employer or in self-employment." Occupation refers to the kind of work performed in a job, and the concept of occupation is defined as "a set of jobs whose main tasks and duties are characterized by a high degree of similarity." A person may be associated with an occupation through the main job currently held, a second job, a future job, or a job previously held. Skill, in this context, is the ability to carry out the tasks and duties of a job.[2]

The latest version, ISCO-08, was adopted in 2008 and includes four classification levels: major groups, sub-major groups, minor groups, and unit groups. It is widely used for comparative labor market studies, policy development, and international reporting, including within the European Union, the United Nations, and other global institutions.

History

[edit]

The origins of ISCO trace back to the mid-20th century when the need for a global occupational classification system became evident. The ILO first introduced ISCO in 1958 as ISCO-58, providing a systematic method for grouping occupations to support labor market analysis and facilitate international comparisons. Subsequent revisions, including ISCO-68, ISCO-88, and ISCO-08, refined the classification criteria to reflect changing labor market structures, technological advancements, and evolving job roles. ISCO has since been widely adopted by national governments and international organizations to align workforce data with global labor market trends. The continuous adaptation of ISCO reflects the necessity of ensuring its relevance amid shifts in employment patterns, technological progress, and the emergence of new economic sectors. Moreover, its role in international labor statistics enables cross-country comparisons, aiding in policy formulation and economic planning.[3][4]

The ISCO-08 revision was developed through consultations with national governments, labor organizations, and international experts to ensure relevance and adaptability. Looking ahead, future iterations of ISCO are expected to incorporate new occupational categories reflecting automation, digital transformation, and emerging industries. The adaptation of ISCO-08 for national use is a critical process to ensure its applicability across diverse labor markets. Countries often modify ISCO-08 to align with national occupational classifications while maintaining international comparability. This adaptation process involves mapping national job structures to ISCO categories, refining classifications to reflect local labor market conditions, and ensuring consistency in data reporting for global labor statistics.[4] Of note, Treiman developed the Standard International Occupational Prestige Scale using the ISCO.[5]

The ISCO-08 structure

[edit]

ISCO-08 organizes occupations into a four-level hierarchical system:

  1. Major Groups (10 broad occupational categories)
  2. Sub-Major Groups (43 broader occupational categories within the major groups)
  3. Minor Groups (130 more specific job groupings)
  4. Unit Groups (436 detailed occupational categories)The ISCO-08 divides jobs into 10 major groups:[6]
  5. Managers
  6. Professionals
  7. Technicians and associate professionals
  8. Clerical support workers
  9. Service and sales workers
  10. Skilled agricultural, forestry and fishery workers
  11. Craft related trades workers
  12. Plant and machine operators, and assemblers
  13. Elementary occupations
  14. Armed forces occupations

Major group 1

[edit]

Managers

  • 11 Chief executives, senior officials and legislators
    • 111 Legislators and senior officials
    • 112 Managing directors and chief executives
  • 12 Administrative and commercial managers
    • 121 Business services and administration managers
    • 122 Sales, marketing and development managers
  • 13 Production and specialized services managers
    • 131 Production managers in agriculture, forestry and fisheries
    • 132 Manufacturing, mining, construction, and distribution managers
    • 133 Information and communications technology service managers
    • 134 Professional services managers
  • 14 Hospitality, retail and other services managers
    • 141 Hotel and restaurant managers
    • 142 Retail and wholesale trade managers
    • 143 Other services managers

Major group 2

[edit]

Professionals

Major group 3

[edit]

Technicians and associate professionals

  • 31 Science and engineering associate professionals
    • 311 Physical and engineering science technicians
    • 312 Mining, manufacturing and construction supervisors
    • 313 Process control technicians
    • 314 Life science technicians and related associate professionals
    • 315 Ship and aircraft controllers and technicians
  • 32 Health associate professionals
  • 33 Business and administration associate professionals
    • 331 Financial and mathematical associate professionals
    • 332 Sales and purchasing agents and brokers
    • 333 Business services agents
    • 334 Administrative and specialized secretaries
    • 335 Regulatory government associate professionals
  • 34 Legal, social, cultural and related associate professionals
    • 341 Legal, social and religious associate professionals
    • 342 Sports and fitness workers
    • 343 Artistic, cultural and culinary associate professionals
  • 35 Information and communications technicians
    • 351 Information and communications technology operations and user support technicians
    • 352 Telecommunications and broadcasting technicians

Major group 4

[edit]

Clerical support workers

  • 41 General and keyboard clerks
    • 411 General office clerks
    • 412 Secretaries (general)
    • 413 Keyboard operators
  • 42 Customer services clerks
    • 421 Tellers, money collectors and related clerks
    • 422 Client information workers
  • 43 Numerical and material recording clerks
    • 431 Numerical clerks
    • 432 Material-recording and transport clerks
  • 44 Other clerical support workers
    • 441 Other clerical support workers

Major group 5

[edit]

Service and sales workers

  • 51 Personal service workers
    • 511 Travel attendants, conductors and guides
    • 512 Cooks
    • 513 Waiters and bartenders
    • 514 Hairdressers, beauticians and related workers
    • 515 Building and housekeeping supervisors
    • 516 Other personal services workers
  • 52 Sales workers
    • 521 Street and market salespersons
    • 522 Shop salespersons
    • 523 Cashiers and ticket clerks
    • 524 Other sales workers
  • 53 Personal care workers
  • 54 Protective services workers
    • 541 Protective services workers

Major group 6

[edit]

Skilled agricultural, forestry and fishery workers

  • 61 Market-oriented skilled agricultural workers
    • 611 Market gardeners and crop growers
    • 612 Animal producers
    • 613 Mixed crop and animal producers
  • 62 Market-oriented skilled forestry, fishery and hunting workers
    • 621 Forestry and related workers
    • 622 Fishery workers, hunters and trappers
  • 63 Subsistence farmers, fishers, hunters and gatherers
    • 631 Subsistence crop farmers
    • 632 Subsistence livestock farmers
    • 633 Subsistence mixed crop and livestock farmers
    • 634 Subsistence fishers, hunters, trappers and gatherers

Major group 7

[edit]

Craft and related trades workers

  • 71 Building and related trades workers, excluding electricians
    • 711 Building frame and related trades workers
    • 712 Building finishers and related trades workers
    • 713 Painters, building structure cleaners and related trades workers
  • 72 Metal, machinery and related trades workers
    • 721 Sheet and structural metal workers, moulders and welders, and related workers
    • 722 Blacksmiths, toolmakers and related trades workers
    • 723 Machinery mechanics and repairers
  • 73 Handicraft and printing workers
    • 731 Handicraft workers
    • 732 Printing trades workers
  • 74 Electrical and electronic trades workers
    • 741 Electrical equipment installers and repairers
    • 742 Electronics and telecommunications installers and repairers
  • 75 Food processing, wood working, garment and other craft and related trades workers
    • 751 Food processing and related trades workers
    • 752 Wood treaters, cabinet-makers and related trades workers
    • 753 Garment and related trades workers
    • 754 Other craft and related workers

Major group 8

[edit]

Plant and machine operators and assemblers

  • 81 Stationary plant and machine operators
    • 811 Mining and mineral processing plant operators
    • 812 Metal processing and finishing plant operators
    • 813 Chemical and photographic products plant and machine operators
    • 814 Rubber, plastic and paper products machine operators
    • 815 Textile, fur and leather products machine operators
    • 816 Food and related products machine operators
    • 817 Wood processing and papermaking plant operators
    • 818 Other stationary plant and machine operators
  • 82 Assemblers
    • 821 Assemblers
  • 83 Drivers and mobile plant operators
    • 831 Locomotive engine drivers and related workers
    • 832 Car, van and motorcycle drivers
    • 833 Heavy truck and bus drivers
    • 834 Mobile plant operators
    • 835 Ships' deck crews and related workers

Major group 9

[edit]

Elementary occupations

  • 91 Cleaners and helpers
    • 911 Domestic, hotel and office cleaners and helpers
    • 912 Vehicle, window, laundry and other hand cleaning workers
  • 92 Agricultural, forestry and fishery labourers
    • 921 Agricultural, forestry and fishery labourers
  • 93 Labourers in mining, construction, manufacturing and transport
    • 931 Mining and construction labourers
    • 932 Manufacturing labourers
    • 933 Transport and storage labourers
  • 94 Food preparation assistants
    • 941 Food preparation assistants
  • 95 Street and related sales and service workers
    • 951 Street and related service workers
    • 952 Street vendors (excluding food)
  • 96 Refuse workers and other elementary workers
    • 961 Refuse workers
    • 962 Other elementary workers

Major group 10

[edit]

Armed forces occupations

  • 101 Commissioned armed forces officers
    • 1011 Commissioned armed forces officers
  • 102 Non-commissioned armed forces officers
    • 1021 Non-commissioned armed forces officers
  • 103 Armed forces occupations, other ranks
    • 1031 Armed forces occupations, other ranks

Methodology

[edit]

Data collection[4]

[edit]

ISCO-based classifications are primarily used in population censuses, labor force surveys, and administrative records. The methodology for collecting occupation data involves structured survey questions that aim to capture essential details about a person's employment. Typical questions include:

  • Occupation or job title: Respondents are asked to provide their official title.
  • Tasks and duties: A detailed description of the primary tasks performed in the role.
  • Work context: Information about whether the work is performed for an employer, is self-employed, or involves the production of goods for sale or personal use.

Data coding and classification[4]

[edit]

The coding process involves assigning standardized ISCO codes to the collected data. This can be performed through:

  • Manual coding: Trained coders review responses and match them with ISCO categories.
  • Computer-assisted coding: Automated systems use occupational title indexes and keyword matching to assign codes.
  • Automatic coding: Advanced algorithms and machine learning models classify occupations with minimal human intervention.

Data validation and analysis[4]

[edit]

To maintain accuracy, ISCO coding is subject to quality control measures such as:

  • Cross-validation: Comparing coded occupations with industry classifications and job descriptions to minimize errors.
  • Sampling considerations: Ensuring that detailed occupational categories are statistically representative and meet publishing standards.
  • Error minimization: Adjustments are made to account for misclassification and ambiguous responses.

The ISCO framework is periodically reviewed and updated to reflect labor market changes, technological advancements, and shifts in workforce dynamics.

ISCO-08 skill model

[edit]

ISCO-08 classifies skills into two key dimensions:

  1. Skill level – The complexity and range of tasks required to perform an occupation, usually linked to educational qualifications or vocational training.
  2. Skill specialization – The field of knowledge required, the necessary tools and machinery used, and the specific nature of the work performed.

The ISCO-08 skill levels correspond to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED-97) groups as follows:

  • Skill Level 1: Corresponds to primary education (ISCED-97 Level 1) and lower secondary education (ISCED-97 Level 2).
  • Skill Level 2: Corresponds to upper secondary education (ISCED-97 Level 3) and post-secondary non-tertiary education (ISCED-97 Level 4).
  • Skill Level 3: Corresponds to the first stage of tertiary education (ISCED-97 Level 5B), which includes vocational education and training.
  • Skill Level 4: Corresponds to the first and second stages of tertiary education (ISCED-97 Levels 5A and 6), which includes university degrees and advanced research qualifications.

Skill level is typically assigned at the ISCO Major Group level, except for Major Group 1: Managers and Major Group 0: Armed Forces Occupations, where it is primarily applied at the second hierarchical level (Sub Major Group level). Within each major group, organizing occupations into sub-major, minor, and unit groups is mainly based on skill specialization.[2]

Comparison with other classification systems

[edit]

ISCO is one of several major occupational classification systems used worldwide. Other prominent systems include the U.S. Standard Occupational Classification (SOC), the European Skills, Competences, Qualifications and Occupations (ESCO), and national classification systems used in various countries.

  • U.S. Standard Occupational Classification (SOC): Developed by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the SOC system categorizes occupations based on work performed and required skills. Unlike ISCO, which is designed for international comparisons, SOC is tailored for national employment analysis and policy-making in the U.S.[7]
  • European Skills, Competences, Qualifications and Occupations (ESCO): Managed by the European Commission, ESCO provides a more detailed classification system incorporating skills and qualifications. ESCO is linked to ISCO but includes a greater focus on skills mapping, making it particularly useful for workforce development and mobility within the EU.[8]
  • National Occupational Classification (NOC): Used in Canada, NOC aligns with ISCO but reflects country-specific labor market trends, industry demands, and workforce regulations.[9]

Criticisms and limitations

[edit]

ISCO is widely used for categorizing jobs across different sectors and countries. However, it has been subject to various criticisms and limitations. One major criticism is the challenge of cross-national comparability. Studies indicate that occupational titles coded under ISCO-08 often vary significantly between countries, raising concerns about the consistency and reliability of classifications. A study found that only 64% of job titles retained the same ISCO-08 4-digit code across multiple countries, highlighting inconsistencies in occupational classification.[10]

Another limitation of ISCO is its rigidity in adapting to evolving labor market structures. The classification system is updated infrequently, which means that emerging professions, particularly in technology and digital fields, are often inadequately represented. This lag can lead to misclassification or exclusion of new job roles that do not fit neatly into predefined categories. For instance, machine learning applications have been used to classify job advertisements into ISCO-08 categories, but results indicate that misclassification occurs due to the evolving nature of job descriptions.[11]

Furthermore, ISCO has been criticized for its limited ability to capture task complexity and job content accurately. Researchers have pointed out that the classification relies heavily on broad occupational groups without considering the nuanced variations within specific jobs. A study analyzing the task content of ISCO-08 occupations found that automation risk varies significantly among jobs classified under the same category, leading to potential misinterpretations in workforce planning.[12]

The socio-economic implications of ISCO classifications have been questioned, particularly regarding occupational prestige and class stratification. Some scholars argue that ISCO fails to adequately reflect socio-economic status differences within occupational groups. Occupational data coded under ISCO are often used to construct indices of occupational prestige, socio-economic status, or class affiliation, but these classifications may not fully capture variations in job prestige and earnings potential. Research has suggested that the International Socio-Economic Index of occupational status (ISEI-08) and the Standard International Occupational Prestige Scale (SIOPS), derived from ISCO, require refinements to improve their accuracy in representing socio-economic class distinctions.[13]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO)". ILOSTAT. Retrieved 13 February 2025.
  2. ^ a b "ISCO-08". isco-ilo.netlify.app. Retrieved 13 February 2025.
  3. ^ "International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO)". ILOSTAT. Retrieved 13 February 2025.
  4. ^ a b c d e International Labour Office, ed. (2012). Structure, group definitions and correspondence tables. International standard classification of occupations. Geneva: International Labour Office. ISBN 978-92-2-125952-7.
  5. ^ Treiman, Donald J. (1977). Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. Quantitative studies in social relations. New York: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-698750-8.
  6. ^ International Labour Organization. Resolution Concerning Updating the International Standard Classification of Occupations. Adopted at the Tripartite Meeting of Experts on Labour Statistics, 6 December 2007.
  7. ^ "SOC home". Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved 13 February 2025.
  8. ^ "European Skills/Competences, Qualifications and Occupations (ESCO) - European Commission". employment-social-affairs.ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 13 February 2025.
  9. ^ Employment and Social Development Canada. "National Occupational Classification - Canada.ca". noc.esdc.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 27 January 2025. Retrieved 13 February 2025.
  10. ^ Tijdens, K.G.; Kaandorp, C.S. (2018). "Validating occupational coding indexes for use in multi-country surveys". doi:10.13094/SMIF-2018-00007. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  11. ^ Cvijetić, Branislava; Radivojević, Zaharije (22 December 2020). "Application of Machine Learning in the Process of Classification of Advertised Jobs". International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computing. 4 (2): 93–100. doi:10.7251/IJEEC2002093C. ISSN 2566-3682.
  12. ^ Mihaylov, Emil; Tijdens, Kea Gartje (2019). "Measuring the Routine and Non-Routine Task Content of 427 Four-Digit ISCO-08 Occupations". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3389681. ISSN 1556-5068.
  13. ^ Ganzeboom, Harry B. G.; De Graaf, Paul M.; Treiman, Donald J. (1 March 1992). "A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status". Social Science Research. 21 (1): 1–56. doi:10.1016/0049-089X(92)90017-B. ISSN 0049-089X.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
  • ISCO official website of the ILO.