Interstate Highway System: Difference between revisions
m →History: correct inaccurate statement and source. |
m →Financing: Citations needed for some stats |
||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
[[Image:Freewayslc.jpg|thumb|right|[[I-15]] near Downtown [[Salt Lake City]]. Five lanes in each direction with three-lane feeders on each side]] |
[[Image:Freewayslc.jpg|thumb|right|[[I-15]] near Downtown [[Salt Lake City]]. Five lanes in each direction with three-lane feeders on each side]] |
||
Virtually 100 percent of the construction and maintenance costs are funded through [[user fee]]s, primarily [[gasoline tax]]es, collected by states and the federal government, and tolls collected on [[toll road]]s and bridges. (The claim that only 56 percent of costs are funded by user fees is based on the misinterpretation of a table that applies to all highways, roads, and streets, not just the Interstate Highways.) In the eastern United States, large sections of some Interstate highways planned or built prior to 1956 are operated as toll roads. |
Virtually 100 percent of the construction and maintenance costs are funded through [[user fee]]s, primarily [[gasoline tax]]es, collected by states and the federal government, and tolls collected on [[toll road]]s and bridges.{{fact}} (The claim that only 56 percent of costs are funded by user fees is based on the misinterpretation of a table that applies to all highways, roads, and streets, not just the Interstate Highways.{{fact}}) In the eastern United States, large sections of some Interstate highways planned or built prior to 1956 are operated as toll roads. |
||
As American suburbs have expanded, the costs incurred in maintaining freeway infrastructure have also grown, leaving little in the way of funds for new Interstate construction.<ref>Field, David. "On 40th birthday, interstates face expensive midlife crisis." ''Insight on the News'', [[29 July]] [[1996]], 40-42.</ref> This has led to the proliferation of toll roads (turnpikes) as the new method of building limited-access highways in suburban areas. Also, some Interstates are being privately maintained (e.g., VMS maintains I-35 in Texas)<ref name="vmsom">{{cite web |url=http://www.vmsom.com/projectsoverviewbytype.shtm#Interstates |title=Projects by Type |accessdate=2008-01-10 |author=VMS, Inc.}}</ref> to meet rising costs of maintenance and allow state departments of transportation to focus on serving the fastest growing regions in their respective states. |
As American suburbs have expanded, the costs incurred in maintaining freeway infrastructure have also grown, leaving little in the way of funds for new Interstate construction.<ref>Field, David. "On 40th birthday, interstates face expensive midlife crisis." ''Insight on the News'', [[29 July]] [[1996]], 40-42.</ref> This has led to the proliferation of toll roads (turnpikes) as the new method of building limited-access highways in suburban areas. Also, some Interstates are being privately maintained (e.g., VMS maintains I-35 in Texas)<ref name="vmsom">{{cite web |url=http://www.vmsom.com/projectsoverviewbytype.shtm#Interstates |title=Projects by Type |accessdate=2008-01-10 |author=VMS, Inc.}}</ref> to meet rising costs of maintenance and allow state departments of transportation to focus on serving the fastest growing regions in their respective states. |
Revision as of 18:29, 12 May 2008
The Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, commonly called the Interstate Highway System (or simply, the Interstate System), is a network of highways (also called freeways or expressways) in the United States that is named for the president who was in office and championed its creation. The Interstate Highway System is a separate system within the larger National Highway System. The entire system, as of 2004, had a total length of 46,837 miles (75,376 km),[1] making it both the largest highway system in the world and the largest public works project in history.[2]
While Interstate highways usually receive substantial federal funding and comply with federal standards, they are owned, built, and operated by the states or toll authorities. The original Woodrow Wilson Bridge, for example, part of Interstate 95 and Interstate 495, was maintained by the federal government; its new span is now jointly owned and maintained by the State of Maryland and the Commonwealth of Virginia.[3]
The system serves nearly all major U.S. cities, with many Interstates passing through downtown areas. The distribution of virtually all goods and services involves Interstate highways at some point.[4] Residents of American cities commonly use urban Interstates to travel to their places of work. The vast majority of long-distance travel, whether for vacation or business, uses the national road network;[5] of these trips, about one-third (by the total number of miles driven in the country in 2003) utilize the Interstate system.[6]
History
The Interstate Highway System was authorized by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, popularly known as the National Interstate and Defense Highways Act of 1956. It had been lobbied for by major U.S. automobile manufacturers and championed by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, who was influenced by his experiences in 1919 as a young soldier crossing the country (following the route of the Lincoln Highway) and his appreciation of the German autobahn network as a necessary component of a national defense system. [7] In addition to facilitating private and commercial transportation, it would provide key ground transport routes for military supplies and troop deployments in an emergency.
Initial federal planning for a nationwide highway system began in 1921 when the Bureau of Public Roads asked the Army to provide a list of roads it considered necessary for national defense, resulting in the Pershing Map.[8] Later that decade, highways such as the New York parkway system had been built as part of local or state highway systems. As automobile traffic increased, planners saw a need for such an interconnected national system to supplement the existing, largely non-freeway, United States Numbered Highway system. By the late 1930s, planning had expanded to a system of new superhighways. In 1938, President Franklin D. Roosevelt gave BPR chief Thomas MacDonald a hand-drawn map of the U.S. marked with eight superhighway corridors for study.[8] The publication General location of national system of interstate highways maps out what became the Interstate System, and is informally known as the Yellow Book.[9]
Although construction on the Interstate Highway System continues, I-70 through Glenwood Canyon, completed in 1992, is often cited as the completion of the system.[10][11] The initial cost estimate for the system was $25 billion over 12 years; it ended up costing $114 billion (adjusted for inflation, $425 billion in 2006 dollars[12]) and taking 35 years to complete.[13]
Due to the cancellation of the Somerset Freeway, Interstate 95 is discontinuous in New Jersey. When the Pennsylvania Turnpike/Interstate 95 Interchange Project concludes in or around 2009[needs update], the last section of the original plan will be completed.[14]
First Interstate highway
Three different states have laid claim to the title of first Interstate highway. Missouri claims that the first three contracts under the new program were signed in Missouri on August 2, 1956. The first contract signed was for U.S. 66 (now I-44). On August 13, 1956, Missouri awarded the first contract based on new Interstate highway funding.[15]
Kansas claims that it was the first to start paving after the act was signed. Preliminary construction had taken place before the act was signed, and paving started September 26, 1956. The state marked its portion of I-70 as the "first project in the United States completed under the provisions of the new Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956." [15]
According to information liaison specialist Richard Weingroff, the Pennsylvania Turnpike could also be considered one of the first Interstate highways. On October 1, 1940, 260 kilometres (162 mi) of the highway opened between Irwin and Carlisle. The state of Pennsylvania refers to the turnpike as "The Granddaddy of the Pikes."[15]
Standards
The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) has defined a set of standards that all new Interstates must meet unless a waiver from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is obtained. One almost absolute standard is the controlled access nature of the roads. With few exceptions, traffic lights (and cross traffic in general) are limited to toll booths and ramp meters (metered flow control for lane merging during rush hour).
Speed limits
Interstate highways usually have the highest speed limits in a given area. Speed limits are determined by individual states. Rural speed limits generally range from 65 to 80 mph (100 to 130 km/h). Typically, lower limits are located in in the more populated northeastern states, while higher speed limits are located in the western states.[16]
Other uses
As one of the components of the National Highway System, Interstate highways improve the mobility of military troops to and from airports, seaports, rail terminals and other military bases. Interstate highways also connect to other roads that are a part of the Strategic Highway Network (abbreviated STRAHNET), a system of roads identified as critical to the U.S. Department of Defense.[17]
The system has also been used to facilitate evacuations in the face of hurricanes and other natural disasters. An option for maximizing traffic throughput on a highway is to reverse the flow of traffic on one side of a divider so that all lanes become outbound lanes. This procedure, known as contraflow, has been employed several times for hurricane evacuations. After public outcry regarding the inefficiency of evacuating from southern Louisiana prior to Hurricane Georges' landfall in September 1998, government officials looked towards contraflow to improve evacuation times. In Savannah, Georgia and Charleston, South Carolina in 1999, lanes of Interstates 16 and 26 were used in a contraflow configuration in anticipation of Hurricane Floyd, with mixed results.[18] In 2004, contraflow was employed ahead of Hurricane Charley in the Tampa, Florida area and on the Gulf Coast before the landfall of Hurricane Ivan;[19] however, evacuation times there were no better than previous evacuation operations. Engineers began to apply lessons learned from the analysis of prior contraflow operations, including limiting exits, removing troopers (so as to keep traffic flowing, instead of having drivers stop for directions), and improving the dissemination of public information. As a result, the 2005 evacuations of New Orleans, Louisiana, and Houston, Texas, prior to hurricanes Katrina and Rita ran far more smoothly.[20]
A widespread urban legend states that one out of every five miles of the Interstate Highway System must be built straight and flat so as to be usable by aircraft during times of war. Contrary to popular lore, Interstate highways are not designed to serve as airstrips. [21][22]
Terminology
While the name implies that Interstate highways cross state lines, many do not (for details see List of intrastate Interstates). Rather, they are funded federally with money shared among the states. There are Interstate highways in Hawaii, funded in the same way as in the other states, but entirely within the populous island of Oahu. They have the designation of H- and connect military bases, though they are open to public use. Both Alaska and Puerto Rico have public roads that receive funding from the Interstate program, although these routes are not signed as Interstate highways (except on paper). These roads are neither planned for, nor built to, official Interstate highway standards.
Primary routes
Interstate highways are typically known as Interstate XX or I-XX, where "XX" is the one- or two-digit route number; sometimes Interstate Highway XX (IH XX) or Interstate Route XX (IR XX) is used. In some areas, the more generic Route XX or Highway XX is used, or in the case of Western New York, Southern California, Southern Nevada, and Honolulu, The XX.[citation needed]
The numbering scheme for the Interstate Highway System (as well as the U.S. Highway System) was developed in 1957 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). The association's latest numbering policy is unchanged from policy dated to August 10, 1973.[23] Within the continental United States, primary Interstates (also called main line Interstates or two-digit Interstates) are assigned numbers less than 100. AASHTO policy discourages Interstate and U.S. highways having the same number within the same state, although there are a few exceptions.[23]
Within this category, east–west highways are assigned even numbers, and north–south highways are assigned odd numbers. Odd route numbers increase from west to east, and even-numbered routes increase from south to north, though there are exceptions to both principles in several locations. Numbers divisible by 5 are intended to be major arteries among the primary routes, carrying traffic long distances.[8][24] Major north–south arterial Interstates increase in number from I-5 between Canada and Mexico along the west coast to I-95 between Miami and Canada along the east coast. Major east–west arterial Interstates increase in number from I-10 between Santa Monica, California and Jacksonville, Florida to I-90 between Seattle and Boston. Two-digit Interstates in Hawaii, as well as the "paper" Interstates of Alaska and Puerto Rico, are numbered sequentially in order of funding, without regard to the rules on odd and even numbers.
Several two-digit numbers are shared between two roads at opposite ends of the country. Some of these were the result of a change in the numbering system as a result of the new policy adopted in 1973. Previously, letter-suffixed numbers were used for long spurs off primary routes; for example, western I-84 was I-80N, as it went north from I-80. The new policy stated that "No new divided numbers (such as I-35W and I-35E, etc.) shall be adopted." The new policy also stated recommended that existing divided numbers be eliminated as quickly as possible; however, I-35W and I-35E still exist in Minnesota and Texas.[23]
AASHTO policy allows dual numbering so as to provide continuity between major control points.[23] This is usually referred to as a concurrency or overlap. For example, I-75 from Chattanooga, Tennessee to Macon, Georgia and I-85 from Greenville, South Carolina to Montgomery, Alabama share the same roadway in Atlanta. As a result, this section of Interstate Highway is labeled both I-75 and I-85. Concurrencies between Interstate and U.S. Route numbers are also allowed per AASHTO policy, so long as the length of the concurrency is "reasonable".[23] The concurrency policy may lead to confusion when two routes on the same roadway are marked in opposite directions. This is called a wrong-way concurrency.
Auxiliary Interstates
Auxiliary Interstate highways are circumferential, radial, or spur highways that principally serve urban areas. These types of interstate highways are given three-digit route numbers, which consist of a single digit prefixed to the two-digit number of a nearby primary interstate highway. Spur routes deviate from its parent and do not return, with a few exceptions; these are given an odd first digit. Circumferential and radial loop routes return to interstate highways, and are given an even first digit. Due to the large number of these routes, auxiliary route numbers may be repeated in different states along the mainline.[25] Some auxiliary highways do not follow these guidelines, however. See List of auxiliary Interstate Highways for these examples.
In the example to the right, City A has an even-numbered circumferential highway. City B has an even-numbered circumferential beltway and an odd-numbered spur. City C has an even-numbered circumferential highway and an odd numbered spur. Because cities A, B and C are in the same state, each auxiliary route carries a distinct three-digit route number.[25]
Unlike primary Interstates, three-digit Interstates are signed as either east/west or north/south, depending on the general orientation of the route, without regard to the route number. For some looped Interstate routes, Inner and Outer banners are used as a directional labeling system as opposed to compass directions.
Special routes
AASHTO defines a category of special routes separate from primary and auxiliary interstate designations. These routes do not have to comply to Interstate construction standards, but are routes that may be identified and approved by the association. The same route marking policy applies to both U.S. Numbered Highways and Interstate Highways; however, some of the special route designations are rarely used for Interstate Highways.[26]
Business Routes, also known as Business Loops and Business Spurs are routes that principally travel through the corporate limits of a city, passing through the central business district of the city. Business routes are used when the regular route is directed around the city.[26]
By-Pass Routes, also known as Relief Routes, designate a route that entirely bypasses a city or congested area, joining with the regular route beyond the city or congested area. The designation is used to carry the regular route's number both through and around a city without implying a preference to travelers for either route.[26] This category is now rarely used with regard to Interstate Highways.
Alternate Routes mark a route that branches off from the main numbered route and rejoins it some miles distant, optionally passing through cities and towns.[26] This category is also now rarely used with regard to Interstate Highways.
Temporary Routes apply to routes that will not be the permanent routing for a given number. It is used when it is necessary to establish a detour on the main Interstate.[26]
Financing
Virtually 100 percent of the construction and maintenance costs are funded through user fees, primarily gasoline taxes, collected by states and the federal government, and tolls collected on toll roads and bridges.[citation needed] (The claim that only 56 percent of costs are funded by user fees is based on the misinterpretation of a table that applies to all highways, roads, and streets, not just the Interstate Highways.[citation needed]) In the eastern United States, large sections of some Interstate highways planned or built prior to 1956 are operated as toll roads.
As American suburbs have expanded, the costs incurred in maintaining freeway infrastructure have also grown, leaving little in the way of funds for new Interstate construction.[27] This has led to the proliferation of toll roads (turnpikes) as the new method of building limited-access highways in suburban areas. Also, some Interstates are being privately maintained (e.g., VMS maintains I-35 in Texas)[28] to meet rising costs of maintenance and allow state departments of transportation to focus on serving the fastest growing regions in their respective states.
It is possible that parts of the system will have to be tolled in the future to meet maintenance and expansion demands, as has been done with adding toll HOV/HOT lanes in certain cities such as San Diego, Salt Lake City, Minneapolis, Houston, Dallas, Atlanta[29][30] and Washington, D.C.
Federal role in financing
The dominant role of the federal government in road finance has enabled it to achieve legislative goals that fall outside its power to regulate interstate commerce as enumerated in the federal Constitution. By threatening to withhold a percentage of highway funds, the federal government has been able to stimulate state legislatures to pass a variety of laws related to the pursuit of "general welfare". In 1987, the Supreme Court upheld the practice as a permissible use of the Constitution's Commerce Clause.[31]
The first major example was the introduction of the 55 mph (90 km/h) national speed limit in 1974. While its purpose was to save fuel in the wake of the 1973 energy crisis, federal speed controls stayed in effect for 21 years. The Commerce Clause was also used to mandate a legal drinking age to 21[31] and lower the legal intoxication level to 0.08%[32][33]
The former of these two is becoming a heated topic of debate, with MADD being steadfast supporters of Legal Age 21, and Choose Responsibility rallying for its repeal, on the grounds that the law causes more problems than it solves.[34][35]
Local maintenance
A few Interstates are maintained by local authorities:
- Baltimore, Maryland: Interstate 70 and Interstate 83 in the city limits[36]
- New York City: Small portions of Interstate 278[37]
- Washington, D.C.: As the city and District are identical, the District maintains the portions of Interstate 66, Interstate 295, Interstate 395 and Interstate 695 inside the city.
- Las Vegas: Much of Interstate 215 is managed by Clark County, Nevada's public works department. Only about four miles of the freeway were turned over to the Nevada Department of Transportation after the road was completed.
Chargeable and non-chargeable Interstate routes
Interstate highways financed with federal funds are known as "chargeable" Interstate routes, and are considered part of the 42,000-mile (68,000 km) network of highways. Federal laws[38] allow highways funded similarly to state and US highways to be signed as Interstates, if they meet the Interstate highway standards and are logical additions or connections to the System.[39]
Called "non-chargeable" Interstate routes, these additions fall under two categories: routes that already meet Interstate standards, and routes not yet upgraded to Interstate standards. Only routes that meet Interstate standards may be signed as Interstates once their proposed number is approved.
Signage
The majority of Interstates have exit numbers. All traffic signs and lane markings on the Interstates are supposed to be designed in compliance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). However, there are many local and regional variations in signage.
For many years, California was the only state that did not use an exit numbering system. It was granted an exemption in the 1950s due to having an already largely completed and signed highway system; at the time, placing exit number signage across the state was deemed too expensive. Since 2002, however, California has begun to incorporate exit numbers on all its freeways - Interstate, U.S., and state routes alike. To mitigate costs, a common occurrence is for Caltrans to install exit number signage only when a freeway or interchange is built, reconstructed, retrofitted, or repaired. The majority of the exits along California's Interstates now have exit number signage, particularly in rural areas.[citation needed]
In most states, the exit numbers correspond to the mileage markers on the Interstates. However, on I-19 in Arizona, length is measured in kilometers instead of miles, in part because it runs south to the Mexican border. On most even-numbered Interstates, mileage count increases from west to east; on odd-numbered Interstates, mileage count increases from south to north. Some tollways, including the New York State Thruway and Jane Addams Memorial Tollway, use radial exit numbering schemes. Exits on the New York State Thruway count up from Yonkers traveling west. On the Jane Addams Memorial Tollway, mileage markers count up from Chicago-O'Hare International Airport traveling west.
Many northeastern states label exit numbers sequentially, regardless of how many miles have passed between exits. States in which Interstate exits are still numbered sequentially are Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont. Maine, Virginia, Georgia, and Florida followed this system for a number of years, but recently converted to having the exit numbers correspond to mileage markers. The Pennsylvania Turnpike uses both the mile marker number and the sequential number. The mile marker number is used for signage, while the sequential number is used for numbering interchanges internally. The New Jersey Turnpike also has sequential numbering, but other Interstates within New Jersey generally use mile markers.
Interstate shield
Interstate Highways are signed by a number placed on a trademarked[8] red, white and blue sign as shown to the right. In the original design, the state was listed above the highway number, but in many states, this area is now left blank. The sign usually measures 36-in (91 cm) high, and is 36-in wide for two-digit Interstates or 45-in (114 cm) for three-digit Interstates.[40]
Interstate business loops and spurs use a special shield where the red and blue are replaced with green, the word BUSINESS appears instead of INTERSTATE, and the word SPUR or LOOP usually appears above the number. [41]
Over time the design of the Interstate shield has changed. In 1958, when the Interstate shield was introduced, the shield color was a dark navy blue and only 17-in (41 cm) wide.[40] The MUTCD standards made a few revisions to the shield in the 1961, 1972, 1988, and 2000 editions. By 2000, the shield size nearly doubled, with some Interstate shields reaching 36-in in diameter.
Extremes
The most heavily traveled area of the Interstate Highway System is the 405 Freeway in Los Angeles, California, with a 2005 estimate of 382,000 vehicles a day.[42] The least traveled section is Interstate 95 just north of Houlton, Maine (near the Canadian border), with 1,880 vehicles a day (2001 estimate).[43]
The most extreme directional points of the Interstate Highway system are:
- Northernmost: The northern termini of Interstates 5, 15, and 29, crossing the Canadian border at the 49th parallel near, respectively, Blaine, Washington, Sweetgrass, Montana, and Pembina, North Dakota.
- Southernmost: A bend on Interstate H-1 in the Kaimuki section of Honolulu, Hawaii, less than 1/2 mile (0.8 km) before its eastern terminus (lat. 21.3 deg. N.). The southernmost point in the 48 contiguous states is the southern terminus of Interstate 95 in Miami, Florida (lat. 25.8 deg. N.).
- Easternmost: The northern terminus of Interstate 95 near Houlton, Maine, at the border of New Brunswick in Canada (long. 67.8 deg. W.).
- Westernmost: The western terminus of Interstate H-1 in Kapolei, Hawaii (long. 158.06 deg. W.). The westernmost point in the contiguous states is a curve on Interstate 5 near Wolf Creek, Oregon (long. 123.23 deg. W.).
The highest point on the Interstate Highway System is at the Eisenhower Tunnel on Interstate 70 in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, at the Continental Divide (elev. 11,158 ft (3,401 m)*). The lowest point on land is on Interstate 8 at the New River near Seeley, California (elev. −52 ft (−16 m)*). The lowest point under water is on Interstate 95 in the Fort McHenry Tunnel under Baltimore Harbor in Baltimore, Maryland (elev. −107 ft (−33 m)*).
The longest Interstate highway is Interstate 90, which runs 3,099 miles (4,987 km) between Boston, Massachusetts and Seattle, Washington. The longest north-south Interstate highway is generally cited as Interstate 95; when completed, it will run 1,927 miles (3,101 km) between Miami, Florida and the Canadian border (there is a gap in New Jersey). The shortest, albeit unsigned, Interstate is Interstate 878, a 0.7-mile (1.1 km) portion of New York State Route 878 adjacent to John F. Kennedy International Airport in Queens, New York. Another short unsigned Interstate is Interstate 110 near downtown El Paso, with a length of 0.92 miles (1.48 km). The shortest signed Interstate is Interstate 375 in downtown Detroit, Michigan, at 1.06 miles (1.71 km).
The shortest Interstate route segment within a state (or federal district) is I-95 in the District of Columbia which is 0.11 miles (0.18 km) long.[44]
References
- ^ "Mn/DOT celebrates Interstate Highway System's 50th anniversary". Retrieved 2007-09-27.
- ^ "The Year of the Interstate". Retrieved 2008-04-29.
- ^ "Attachment V, Ownership and Maintenance Agreement for the Wilson Bridge, Woodrow Wilson Bridge Initial Financial Plan" (PDF). Woodrow Wilson Bridge Project. Retrieved 2007-08-02.
- ^ Caltrans (2006). "The Interstate Highway System Turns 50". Retrieved 2008-01-10.
- ^ "Table 1-36: Long-Distance Travel in the United States by Selected Trip Characteristics". Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 1995. Retrieved 2006-12-21.
- ^ "Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles and Related Data". Federal Highway Administration. 2003. Retrieved 2006-12-21.
- ^ Petroski, Henry (2006), "On the Road", American Scientist, 94 (5): pp. 396-399
{{citation}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ a b c d McNichol, Dan. The Roads that Built America: The Incredible Story of the U.S. Interstate System. New York: Sterling Publishing Co., Inc., 2006. ISBN 1-4027-3468-9
- ^ Norton, Peter (1996). "Fighting Traffic: U.S. Transportation Policy and Urban Congestion, 1955-1970". Essays in History (Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia). Retrieved 2008-01-17.
- ^ "CDOT Fun Facts". Colorado Department of Transportation. Retrieved 2008-02-15.
- ^ Karen Stufflebeam Row, Eva LaDow, and Steve Moler. "Glenwood Canyon 12 Years Later". United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Neuharth, Al (2006-06-23). "Traveling interstates is our sixth freedom". USA TODAY.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Minnesota Department of Transportation (2006). "Mn/DOT celebrates Interstate Highway System's 50th anniversary". Retrieved 2008-01-17.
- ^ Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission. "I-95/I-276 Interchange Project Meeting Design Management Summary - DRAFT: Design Advisory Committee Meeting #2" (PDF).
- ^ a b c Weingroff, Richard F. (2005-05-07). "Three States Claim First Interstate Highway". Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
- ^ Carr, John (2007-10-11). "State traffic and speed laws". Retrieved 2008-01-10.
- ^ Slater, Rodney E. (Spring 1996). "The National Highway System: A Commitment to America's Future". Retrieved 2008-01-10.
- ^ Wolshon, Brian, P.E. (August 2001). ""One-Way-Out": Contraflow Freeway Operation for Hurricane Evacuation". Retrieved 2008-01-10.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Florida Department of Transportation. "Contraflow Implementation Experiences in the Southern Coastal States" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-09-27.
- ^ McNichol, Dan (December 2006). "Contra Productive". Roads & Bridges. Retrieved 2008-01-10.
- ^ Landing of Hope and Glory, snopes.com, retrieved 2007-12-30
{{citation}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ^ Weingroff, Richard F. (May/June 2000). "ONE MILE IN FIVE: Debunking the Myth". Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved 2006-06-29.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ a b c d e AASHTO (January 2000). "Establishment of a Marking System of the Routes Comprising the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-01-23.
- ^ The Rambler (2005-01-18). "Ask the Rambler: Was I-76 Numbered to Honor Philadelphia for Independence Day, 1776?". Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved 2008-01-17.
- ^ a b Federal Highway Administration (2007-03-22). "FHWA Route Log and Finder List". Retrieved 2008-01-23.
- ^ a b c d e AASHTO (January 2000). "Establishment and Development of United States Numbered Highways" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-01-23.
- ^ Field, David. "On 40th birthday, interstates face expensive midlife crisis." Insight on the News, 29 July 1996, 40-42.
- ^ VMS, Inc. "Projects by Type". Retrieved 2008-01-10.
- ^ Ariel Hart. "1st toll project proposed for I-20 east. Plan would add lanes outside I-285" (PDF). Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved 2007-09-27.
- ^ Darryl D. VanMeter. "Future of HOV in Atlanta" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-09-27.
- ^ a b U.S. Supreme Court (1987-06-23). "SOUTH DAKOTA v. DOLE, 483 U.S. 203 (1987)". FindLaw. Retrieved 2008-01-17.
- ^ U.S. Government Printing Office (2005-01-03). "Sec. 163. Safety incentives to prevent operation of motor vehicles by intoxicated persons". U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved 2008-01-17.
- ^ U.S. Government Printing Office (2005-01-03). "Sec. 158. National minimum drinking age". U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved 2008-01-17.
- ^ "Choose Responsibility". Retrieved 2008-03-29.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ "Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD)". Retrieved 2008-03-29.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Template:PDFlink
- ^ New York State Department of Transportation - Region 11 (New York City) Built and Unbuilt Arterial System
- ^ 23 U.S.C. §§ 103–4
- ^ California Highways: Interstate Highway Types and the History of California's Interstates
- ^ a b Interstate Shield Galleries
- ^ Index of Interstate Business Loops
- ^ U.S. Highways With the Most Traffic
- ^ Interstate 95 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
- ^ Interstate Route Numbering
See also
- Contraflow
- Gas tax
- Highway patrol
- Non-motorized vehicle access on freeways
- List of roads and highways
- Mile-log
- Parkway
- List of major freeway systems
- Adopt a Highway
- International E-road network in Europe