International Federation of the Phonographic Industry: Difference between revisions
→Domain incidents: Correcting the capitalization, ifpi.***ORG***, not .com, and umm removing space between period and reference. |
|||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
In a separate incident, on the 18th February 2009, the Swedish [http://www.ifpi.se ifpi.se] domain was hacked by [[The Pirate Bay]] sympathizer(s). This occurred on the third day of the trial of the Pirate Bay founders in Sweden. The site was replaced with a short message directed at the Prosecutor [[Håkan Roswall]] and plaintiffs ("Warner Brothers etc"). It was signed "The New Generation". <ref>{{cite web|url=http://bayimg.com/image/danhmaabk.jpg|title=Screenshot of translated message, original in Swedish}}</ref> Peter Sunde of Pirate Bay made an appeal on [[Twitter]] requesting that the hackers stop this defacement.<ref>{{cite journal|journal=New Scientist|page=p. 17|title=Technology = "Whoever is hacking, please stop doing that"|volume=201|issue=2697|publisher=Reed Business Information}}</ref> |
In a separate incident, on the 18th February 2009, the Swedish [http://www.ifpi.se ifpi.se] domain was hacked by [[The Pirate Bay]] sympathizer(s). This occurred on the third day of the trial of the Pirate Bay founders in Sweden. The site was replaced with a short message directed at the Prosecutor [[Håkan Roswall]] and plaintiffs ("Warner Brothers etc"). It was signed "The New Generation". <ref>{{cite web|url=http://bayimg.com/image/danhmaabk.jpg|title=Screenshot of translated message, original in Swedish}}</ref> Peter Sunde of Pirate Bay made an appeal on [[Twitter]] requesting that the hackers stop this defacement.<ref>{{cite journal|journal=New Scientist|page=p. 17|title=Technology = "Whoever is hacking, please stop doing that"|volume=201|issue=2697|publisher=Reed Business Information}}</ref> |
||
On 19 April 2009, after the announcement of an unfavorable Swedish court decision against The Pirate Bay, the ifpi.org domain was subjected to a [[DDoS]] attack.<ref>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/20/ddos_hacktivism_pirate_bay/</ref> |
On 19 April 2009, after the announcement of an unfavorable Swedish court decision against The Pirate Bay, the ifpi.org domain was subjected to a [[DDoS]] attack by Lego.com <ref>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/20/ddos_hacktivism_pirate_bay/</ref> |
||
==OiNK.cd incident== |
==OiNK.cd incident== |
Revision as of 19:23, 20 April 2009
This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2008) |
The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) is the organization that represents the interests of the recording industry worldwide. Its secretariat is based in London, UK, with regional offices in Brussels, Hong Kong, Miami, Athens, and Moscow.[1]
Services provided its members include: introducing and improving copyright laws, anti-piracy enforcement, anti-piracy litigation, Internet monitoring and closing of illegal sites, marketing and public relations efforts, and working to create new forms of Digital Rights Management.[2]
Since January 1, 2005, the chief executive and chairman of IFPI is John Kennedy OBE, who has worked in the industry for more than 30 years and was one of the co-producers of Live Aid and Live8.[3]
Scope of influence
As of 2008, the IFPI represents approximately 1,400 record companies in 73 countries,[1]. According to the IFPI, "any company, firm or person producing sound recordings or music videos which are made available to the public in reasonable quantities is eligible for membership of IFPI"[1], though they do not say what "reasonable quantities" actually means.
In those countries where there is a national group of IFPI or an affiliated organization, potential members should first join the national body before seeking membership of IFPI. There are 44 of these National Bodies or affiliate groups,[1] including the BPI (British Phonographic Industry), ARIA (Australian Recording Industry Association), and the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America). (Although recognized as an "affiliated group", the RIAA on their own web site specifically notes that IFPI administers programs "for a number of countries, excluding the United States"[4].)
History
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (May 2008) |
Phonogram performance rights
The IFPI was formed as the phonographic industry, invited by "Confederazione Generale Fascista dell'Industria Italiana", held their first international congress in Rome, 10 - 14 November 1933.[5] They would represent "the interests of the recording industry worldwide in all fora" [6] by promoting legislation and copyrights[7] "to protect the largely British-based recording industry" by promoting a global performance right in gramophone sound recordings.[8]
Phonogram copyrights
The IFPI heavily lobbied at the Rome Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organisations of 1961, which established an international standard for the protection of sound recordings, live performances & broadcasts. This Convention was opposed by trade groups representing authors and composers, who were concerned that establishing such "neighbouring rights" would undermine their own control over how their works were used and would result in prohibitively expensive licensing.[9] Pressure from broadcasters who didn't want to license the records they broadcast, among other factors, kept the U.S. from signing the Convention; the U.S. did not recognize a separate sound recording copyright until 1971.[10]
Phonogram anti-piracy
The IFPI then began a campaign against piracy. In 1971 it succeeded in advocating and obtaining the Convention for the Protection of Producers of Phonograms Against Unauthorized Duplication of Their Phonograms (the Geneva Phonograms Convention), which 72 countries signed.[11]
In 1986, the ISO established the International Standard Recording Code (ISRC) standard, ISO 3901. In 1989, the IFPI was designated the registration authority for ISRC codes. ISRC codes "enable the use of copyright protected recordings and works to be controlled; facilitate the distribution and collection of royalties (performances, private copying); and assist in the fight against piracy."[12]
In 1994, in an effort to combat piracy, the IFPI and the compact disc manufacturing industry introduced Source Identification (SID) codes, which are markings on CD parts that identify the manufacturers, equipment, and master discs that were used to create each disc.
SID codes are formatted as the letters "IFPI" followed by 4 or 5 hexadecimal digits. A SID-marked disc typically bears at least two codes, each imprinted on different physical components. A number prefaced with "L" is a "mastering code," a serial number taken from a pool assigned by Philips to the manufacturer. It identifies the Laser Beam Recorder (LBR) signal processor or mold that produced a particular stamper or a glass master disc from which molds are produced. Non-"L" numbers are "mold codes", the first 2 or 3 digits of which are assigned by Philips to the operator of the manufacturing or mastering plant, which might not be the same plant that manufactured the stamper or glass master; and the remaining digits are a serial number assigned by that plant to its molds.
Domain incidents
In mid-October 2007, after the IFPI let the ifpi.com domain registration lapse, ownership of the ifpi.com domain was transferred to The Pirate Bay, a pro-piracy group which claimed it received the domain from an anonymous donor.[13] The group set up a Web site under the domain titled "International Federation of Pirates Interests," a replacement backronym for IFPI. Ownership of the domain was returned to the IFPI in late November, when a WIPO arbitration panel concluded that "the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the [IFPI] has rights" and that the Pirate Bay's representative "registered and [was] using the Disputed Domain Name in bad faith" and failed to adequately rebut the IFPI's contention that he "has no rights or a legitimate interest in the Disputed Domain Name."[14]
In a separate incident, on the 18th February 2009, the Swedish ifpi.se domain was hacked by The Pirate Bay sympathizer(s). This occurred on the third day of the trial of the Pirate Bay founders in Sweden. The site was replaced with a short message directed at the Prosecutor Håkan Roswall and plaintiffs ("Warner Brothers etc"). It was signed "The New Generation". [15] Peter Sunde of Pirate Bay made an appeal on Twitter requesting that the hackers stop this defacement.[16]
On 19 April 2009, after the announcement of an unfavorable Swedish court decision against The Pirate Bay, the ifpi.org domain was subjected to a DDoS attack by Lego.com [17]
OiNK.cd incident
On October 23, 2007, the torrent website OiNK.cd was shut down. The website showed a message telling of an investigation of OiNK.cd by the IFPI, BPI, Cleveland Police, and the FIOD ECD into "suspected illegal music distribution".[18]
See also
References
- ^ a b c d "About IFPI". 2008-02-29. Retrieved 2008-07-02.
- ^ "What services does IFPI provide?". IFPI. Retrieved 2009-03-30.
- ^ "John Kennedy to succeed Jay Berman as Chairman and CEO of IFPI" (Press release). IFPI. 2004-09-13. Retrieved 2008-07-02.
- ^ "RIAA: Gold & Platinum: History". riaa.org. Retrieved 2009-03-31.
- ^ Thalheim, Dr. R. (1938), "Der Schutz der Schallplatte nach italienischen Verordnung vom 18. Februar 1937.", Archiv für Urheber-, Film- und Theaterrecht, vol. 11, Berlin: Julius Springer, p. 39
- ^ Drahos, Peter; Braithwaite, John (2002), Information Feudalism: Who Owns The Knowledge Economy?, Earthscan, pp. 181–182, ISBN 1853839175 "The key actor in coordinating the industry's piracy strategy became its international trade association, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. Formed in 1933, its mission was to represent 'the interests of the recording industry worldwide in all fora' (IFPI interview, 1993)."
- ^ Davies, Gillian (May 1984), Oral History of Recorded Sound (Abstract), British Library National Sound Archive, retrieved 2008-04-10 "IFPI founded in 1933 to deal with [r]ecord industry at inter-governmental level; promoting legislation; copyrights for industry worldwide." Davies was an associate director and chief legal counsel to the IFPI.
- ^ Frith, Simon (January 1988), Copyright and the music business, vol. 7, p. 57
{{citation}}
: Unknown parameter|publication=
ignored (help) "IFPI was founded in 1933, in its own words, 'to protect the largely British-based recording industry', but, as Gavin McFarlane points out, its brief was more specifically 'to promote on a world-wide basis the performing right in gramophone records'…" - ^ Drahos & Braithwaite 2002, pg. 181: "Authors and composers became increasingly worried by copyright's technological turn. They saw it as compromising the artistic purity of copyright. At a more practical level, authors were worried that the recognition of a 'neighbouring right' in the form of a sound recording would undermine their control over the use of works as well as add to users' costs. Users would now have to pay additional licence fees to producers of sound recordings. It was the resistance of key author associations that helps to explain why it took more than 30 years for an international standard for the protection of sound recordings to emerge in the form of the Rome Convention of 1961."
- ^ Drahos & Braithwaite 2002, pg. 181: "The US did not join the Rome Convention. Aside from some constitutional issues, powerful broadcasting organizations in the US did not want to endanger a status quo in which they received records from the recording industry for free or at a discount. Domestically, the US did not recognize a separate copyright in sound recordings until 1971."
- ^ Drahos & Braithwaite 2002, pg. 181: "After its major lobbying effort on the Rome Convention [of 1961], IFPI began a campaign against piracy. It pushed for and obtained in 1971 the Convention for the Protection of Producers of Phonograms against Unauthorized Duplication of their Phonograms."
- ^ ISRC Practical Guide, 3rd edition, 1998, International ISRC Agency, LONDON
- ^ Ernesto (2007-10-12). "Anti-Piracy Organization Domain IFPI.com Now Owned by The Pirate Bay". TorrentFreak. Retrieved 2008-04-10.
- ^ "WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Administrative Panel Decision: IFPI Secretariat, IFPI International Federation of the Phonographic Industry v. Peter Kopimi Sunde aka Brokep (Case No. D2007-1328)". 2007-11-19. Retrieved 2008-04-10.
- ^ "Screenshot of translated message, original in Swedish".
- ^ "Technology = "Whoever is hacking, please stop doing that"". New Scientist. 201 (2697). Reed Business Information: p. 17.
{{cite journal}}
:|page=
has extra text (help) - ^ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/20/ddos_hacktivism_pirate_bay/
- ^ Burton, Nigel (2007-10-14). "Police release suspect in illegal music download investigation". The Northern Echo. Retrieved 2008-04-10.