Heroides

The Heroides (Her.) (The Heroines), or Epistulae Heroidum (Letters of Heroines), are a collection of fifteen epistolary poems composed by Ovid in Latin elegiac couplets, and presented as though written by a selection of aggrieved heroines of Greek and Roman mythology, in address to their heroic lovers who have in some way mistreated, neglected, or abandoned them.

Front matter of Boswell's copy of the 1732 edition of the Heroides, edited by Peter Burmann.
Note the title Heroides sive Epistolae,
The Heroides or the Letters.

A further set of six poems—widely known as the Double Heroides and numbered 16 to 21 in modern scholarly editions—follows these individual letters and presents three separate exchanges of paired epistles: one each from a heroic lover to his absent beloved and from the heroine in return.

Arguably some of Ovid's most influential works (see below), one point that has greatly contributed to the mystique of the Heroides—and to the reverberations they have produced within the writings of later generations—is directly attributable to Ovid himself. In the third book of his Ars Amatoria, Ovid makes the claim that, in writing these fictional epistolary poems in the personae of famous heroines—rather than from a first-person perspective—he created an entirely new literary genre. Recommending parts of his poetic output as suitable reading material to his assumed audience of Roman women, Ovid wrote of his Heroides: "vel tibi composita cantetur Epistola voce: | ignotum hoc aliis ille novavit opus" (Ars Amatoria 3.345–6: "Or let an Epistle be sung out by you in practiced voice: unknown to others, he [sc. Ovid] originated this sort of composition”). The full extent of Ovid's originality in this matter has been a point of scholarly contention: E. J. Kenney (University of Cambridge), for instance, notes that "novavit is ambiguous: either 'invented' or 'renewed', cunningly obscuring without explicitly disclaiming O[vid]'s debt to Propertius' Arethusa (4.3) for the original idea." In spite of various interpretations of Propertius 4.3, consensus nevertheless concedes to Ovid the lion's share of the credit in the thorough exploration of what was, in its time, a highly innovative poetic form.

Dating and authenticity

The exact dating of the Heroides, as with the overall chronology of the Ovidian corpus, remains a matter of debate. As Peter E. Knox (University of Colorado at Boulder) notes, "[t]here is no consensus about the relative chronology of this [sc. early] phase of O[vid]'s career," a position which has not advanced significantly since that comment was made. Exact dating is hindered not only by a lack of evidence, but by the fact that much of what is known at all comes from Ovid's own poetry. One passage in the second book of Ovid's Amores (Am.) has been adduced especially often in this context:

quod licet, aut artes teneri profitemur Amoris   (ei mihi, praeceptis urgeor ipse meis!) aut quod Penelopes verbis reddatur Ulixi,   scribimus et lacrimas, Phylli relicta, tuas, quod Paris et Macareus et quod male gratus Iason   Hippolytique parens Hippolytusque legant, quodque tenens strictum Dido miserabilis ensem   dicat et †Aoniae Lesbis amata lyrae.† — Am. 2.18.19–26

I do what I may—either profess the arts of tender love   (Alas! I'm beset by my own teachings!) Or write what's rendered in the words of Penelope to her Ulysses,   And your tearful tale too, forsaken Phyllis— That which Paris and Macareus, and that also which oh-so-ungrateful Jason,   And Hippolytus's sire, and Hippolytus himself may read— And what pitiable Dido, holding now the blade unsheathed,   Might say, and so too †that woman of Lesbos, beloved of the Aonian lyre.†

Knox notes that "[t]his passage ... provides the only external evidence for the date of composition of the Heroides listed here. The only collection of Heroides attested by O[vid] therefore antedates at least the second edition of the Amores (c. 2 BC), and probably the first (c. 16 BC) ..." On this view, the most probable date of composition for at least the majority of the collection of single Heroides ranges between c. 25 and 16 BC, if indeed their eventual publication predated that of the assumed first edition of the Amores in that latter year. Regardless of absolute dating, the evidence nonetheless suggests that the single Heroides represent some of Ovid's earliest poetic efforts.

Questions of authenticity, however, have often inhibited the literary appreciation of these poems. Joseph Farrell (University of Pennsylvania) identifies three distinct issues of importance to the collection in this regard: (1) individual interpolations within single poems, (2) the authorship of entire poems by a possible Ovidian impersonator, and (3) the relation of the Double Heroides to the singles, coupled with the authenticity of that secondary collection. Discussion of these issues has been a focus, even if tangentially, of many treatments of the Heroides in recent memory.

As an example following these lines, for some time scholars debated over whether this passage from the Amores—corroborating, as it does, only the existence of Her. 1–2, 4–7, 10–11, and very possibly of 12, 13, and 15—could be cited fairly as evidence for the inauthenticity of at least the letters of Briseis (3), Hermione (8), Deianira (9), and Hypermnestra (14), if not also those of Medea (12), Laodamia (13), and Sappho (15). Stephen Hinds (University of Washington) argued, however, that this list constitutes only a poetic catalogue, in which there was no need for Ovid to have enumerated every individual epistle. This assertion has been widely persuasive, and the tendency amongst scholarly readings of the later 1990s and following has been towards careful and insightful literary explication of individual letters, either proceeding under the assumption of, or with an eye towards proving, Ovidian authorship. Other studies, eschewing direct engagement with this issue in favour of highlighting the more ingenious elements—and thereby demonstrating the high value—of individual poems in the collection, have essentially subsumed the authenticity debate, implicating it through a tacit equation of high literary quality with Ovidian authorship. This trend is visible especially in the most recent monographs on the Heroides.

The collection

The paired letters of the Double Heroides are not outlined here: see the relevant section of that article for the double epistles (16–21). The single Heroides are written from the viewpoints of the following heroines (and heroes). The quotations highlighted are the opening couplets of each poem, by which each would have been identified in medieval manuscripts of the collection:

• I. Penelope writes to her famed husband, Odysseus, a hero of the Trojan War, towards the end of his long absence (the subject of Homer's Odyssey).

Epistula I:

Haec tua Penelope lento tibi mittit, Ulixe;   nil mihi rescribas attinet: ipse veni!

This your Penelope sends to you, too-slow Ulysses;   A letter in return does me no good; come yourself!

• II. Phyllis, the daughter of Lycurgus, writes to her lover Demophoon, the son of Theseus, king of Athens, after he fails in his promised return from his homeland.

Epistula II:

Hospita, Demophoon, tua te Rhodopeia Phyllis   ultra promissum tempus abesse queror!

I, your hostess, Demophoon—I, your Phyllis of Rhodope—   Complain: you're gone far longer than you promised!

• III. Briseis, the daughter of Briseus, writes to Achilles, the central hero of the Trojan War and focal character of Homer's Iliad, urging him to accept her as part of a package-deal from Agamemnon, leader of the Greek forces at Troy, and to return to battle against the Trojans.

Epistula III:

Quam legis, a rapta Briseide littera venit,   vix bene barbarica Graeca notata manu.

What you're reading—this letter came from your ravished Briseis,   The Greek painstakingly copied out by her uncivilised hand.

• IV. Phaedra, wife of Theseus, writes to her stepson, Hippolytus, confessing her semi-incestuous and illicit love for him.

Epistula IV:

Quam nisi tu dederis, caritura est ipsa, salutem   mittit Amazonio Cressa puella viro.

What well-being she herself will lack unless you give it her   The Cretan maiden sends to the man born of an Amazon.

• V. The nymph Oenone, by Hellenistic tradition Paris' first wife, writes to Paris, son of Priam King of Troy, after he abandoned her to go on his famed journey to Sparta, and then returned with the abducted Helen of Sparta as a wife.

Epistula V:

Perlegis? an coniunx prohibet nova? perlege! non est   ista Mycenaea littera facta manu.

Are you reading? Or perhaps your new wife forbids it. Read—it's no   Letter made by any Mycenaean hand!

• VI. Hypsipyle, queen of Lemnos, to Jason, after he abandoned her for Medea

Epistula VI:

Litora Thessaliae reduci tetigisse carina   diceris auratae vellere dives ovis.

• VII. Dido to Aeneas, on his departure to Italy

Epistula VII:

Sic ubi fata vocant, udis abiectus in herbis   ad vada Maeandri concinit albus olor.

• VIII. Hermione, daughter of Menelaus, to Orestes, son of Agamemnon and Clytemnestra, urging him to save her from marriage to Achilles’ son, Pyrrhus

Epistula VIII:

Pyrrhus Achillides, animosus imagine patris,   inclusam contra iusque piumque tenet.

• IX. Deianira, daughter of Oeneus, king of Aetolia, to her husband Hercules, after he laid down his weapons to be with Iole, the daughter of Eurytus, king of Oechalia

Epistula IX:

Gratulor Oechaliam titulis accedere nostris,   victorem victae succubuisse queror.

• X. Ariadne to Theseus after he abandoned her on the island of Naxos on his way back to Athens. He does not marry Phaedra until later (see Epistle IV).

Epistula X:

Mitius inveni quam te genus omne ferarum;   credita non ulli quam tibi peius eram.

• XI. Canace, daughter of Aeolus, to her brother and lover, Macareus, before killing herself following the death of their baby at the hands of their father

Epistula XI:

Siqua tamen caecis errabunt scripta lituris,   oblitus a dominae caede libellus erit.

• XII. Medea to Jason, after he abandoned her to marry Creusa (also known as Glauce)

Epistula XII:

At tibi Colchorum, memini, regina vacavi,   ars mea cum peteres ut tibi ferret opem!

• XIII. Laodamia, the daughter of Acastus, to her husband Protesilaus, urging him not to take too many risks in the Greeks’ attack on Troy

Epistula XIII:

Mittit et optat amans, quo mittitur, ire salutem   Haemonis Haemonio Laodamia viro.

• XIV. Hypermnestra to her husband, Lynceus, calling for him to save her from death at the hands of her father, Danaus

Epistula XIV:

Mittit Hypermestra de tot modo fratribus uni;   cetera nuptarum crimine turba iacet.

• XV. Sappho to her ex-lover Phaon, after he left her

Epistula XV:

Ecquid, ut adspecta est studiosae littera dextrae,   Protinus est oculis cognita nostra tuis?

Translations

A translation was made of this work at the end of the fifteenth century by the French poet Octavien de Saint-Gelais, who later became Bishop of Angoulême. In the same century, Juan Rodríguez de la Cámara wrote his Bursario, a partial translation of the Heroides.

The Loeb Classical Library combines the Heroides with Amores in Ovid I. Penguin Books first published Harold Isbell's translation in 1990. Isbell's translation uses unrhymed couplets that generally alternate between eleven and nine syllables. A translation in rhymed couplets by Darryl Hine appeared in 1991.

Notes

All notes refer to works listed in the Bibliography, below.

Selected bibliography

For references specifically relating to that subject, please see the relevant bibliography of the Double Heroides.

Editions

(Texts in Latin)

Commentaries

• Kenney, E. J. (ed.) (1996) Ovid Heroides XVI–XXI (Cambridge).
• Knox, P. E. (ed.) (1995) Ovid: Heroides. Select Epistles (Cambridge).

Literary overviews and textual criticism

• Anderson, W. S. (1973) "The Heroides", in J. W. Binns (ed.) Ovid (London and Boston): 49–83.
• Arena, A. (1995) "Ovidio e l’ideologia augustea: I motivi delle Heroides ed il loro significato", Latomus 54.4: 822–41.
• Courtney, E. (1965) "Ovidian and Non-Ovidian Heroides", Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London (BICS) 12: 63–6.
• ___. (1998) "Echtheitskritik: Ovidian and Non-Ovidian Heroides Again", CJ 93: 157–66.
• Farrell, J. (1998) "Reading and Writing the Heroides", Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (HSCP) 98: 307–338.
• Fulkerson, L. (2005) The Ovidian Heroine as Author: Reading, Writing, and Community in the Heroides (Cambridge).
• Heinze, T. (1991–93) "The Authenticity of Ovid Heroides 12 Reconsidered", Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London (BICS) 38: 94–8.
• Jacobson, H. (1974) Ovid's Heroides (Princeton).
• Kennedy, D. F. (2002) "Epistolarity: The Heroides", in P. R. Hardie (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ovid (Cambridge): 217–32.
• Knox, P. E. (1986) "Ovid's Medea and the Authenticity of Heroides 12", Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (HSCP) 90: 207–23.
• ___. (2002) "The Heroides: Elegiac Voices", in B. W. Boyd (ed.) Brill's Companion to Ovid (Leiden): 117–39.
• Lachmann, K. (1876) Kleinere Schriften zur classischen Philologie, Bd. 2 (Berlin).
• Lindheim, S. (2003) Mail and Female: Epistolary Narrative and Desire in Ovid's Heroides (Madison, WI).
• Palmer, A. (ed.) [completed by L.C. Purser (ed.)] (1898) P. Ovidi Nasonis Heroides, with the Greek translation of Planudes (Oxford).
• Rahn, H. (1963) "Ovids elegische Epistel", Antike und Abendland (A&A) 7: 105–120.
• Reeve, M. D. (1973) "Notes on Ovid’s Heroides", Classical Quarterly (CQ) 23: 324–338.
• Rosenmeyer, P. A. (1997) "Ovid’s Heroides and Tristia: Voices from Exile", Ramus 26.1: 29–56. [Reprinted in Knox (ed.) (2006): 217–37.]
• Smith, R. A. (1994) "Fantasy, Myth, and Love Letters: Text and Tale in Ovid’s Heroides", Arethusa 27: 247–73.
• Spentzou, E. (2003) Readers and Writers in Ovid’s Heroides: Transgressions of Genre and Gender (Oxford).
• Steinmetz, P. (1987) "Die literarische Form der Epistulae Heroidum Ovids", Gymnasium 94: 128–45.
• Stroh, W. (1991) "Heroides Ovidianae cur epistolas scribant", in G. Papponetti (ed.) Ovidio poeta della memoria (Rome): 201–44.
• Verducci, F. (1985) Ovid’s Toyshop of the Heart (Princeton).

Analyses of individual epistles

• Barchiesi, A. (1995) Review of Hintermeier (1993), Journal of Roman Studies (JRS) 85: 325–7.
• ___. (2001) Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets, eds. and trans. M. Fox and S. Marchesi (London):
  • "Continuities", 9–28. [Translated and reprinted from Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici (MD) 16 (1986).]
  • "Narrativity and Convention in the Heroides", 29–48. [Translated and reprinted from Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici (MD) 19 (1987).]
  • "Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion and the Heroides", 105–28. [Reprinted from Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (HSCP) 95 (1993).]
• Casali, S. (1992) "Enone, Apollo pastore, e l’amore immedicabile: giochi ovidiani su di un topos elegiaco", Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici (MD) 28: 85–100.
• Fulkerson, L. (2002^a) "Writing Yourself to Death: Strategies of (Mis)reading in Heroides 2", Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici (MD) 48: 145–65.
• ___. (2002^b) "(Un)Sympathetic Magic: A Study of Heroides 13", American Journal of Philology (AJPh) 123: 61–87.
• ___. (2003) "Chain(ed) Mail: Hypermestra and the Dual Readership of Heroides 14", Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 133: 123–146.
• Hinds, S. (1993) "Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the Life of an Intertextual Heroine", Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici (MD) 30: 9–47.
• ___. (1999) "First Among Women: Ovid, and the Traditions of ‘Exemplary’ Catalogue", in amor : roma, S. M. Braund and R. Mayer (eds.), Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (PCPS) Supp. 22: 123–42.
• Hintermeier, C. M. (1993) Die Briefpaare in Ovids Heroides, Palingensia 41 (Stuttgart).
• Jolivet, J.-C. (2001) Allusion et fiction epistolaire dans Les Heroïdes: Recherches sur l'intertextualité ovidienne, Collection de l' École Française de Rome 289 (Rome).
• Kennedy, D. F. (1984) "The Epistolary Mode and the First of Ovid’s Heroides", Classical Quarterly (CQ) n.s. 34: 413–22. [Reprinted in Knox (ed.) (2006): 69–85.]
• Lindheim, S. (2000) "Omnia Vincit Amor: Or, Why Oenone Should Have Known It Would Never Work Out (Eclogue 10 and Heroides 5)", Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici (MD) 44: 83–101.
• Rosati, G. (1991) "Protesilao, Paride, e l’amante elegiaco: un modello omerico in Ovidio", Maia 43.2: 103–14.
• ___. (1992) "L’elegia al femminile: le Heroides di Ovidio (e altre heroides)", Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici (MD) 29: 71–94.
• Vessey, D. W. T. (1976) "Humor and Humanity in Ovid’s Heroides", Arethusa 9: 91–110.
• Viarre, S. (1987) "Des poèmes d’Homère aux Heroïdes d’Ovide: Le récit épique et son interpretation élégiaque", Bulletin de l’association Guillaume Budé Ser. 4: 3.

Scholarship of tangential significance

• Armstrong, R. (2005) Ovid and His Love Poetry (London) [esp. chs. 2 and 4]
• Hardie, P. R. (2002) Ovid's Poetics of Illusion (Cambridge).
• Holzberg, N. (1997) "Playing with his Life: Ovid's 'Autobiographical' References", Lampas 30: 4–19. [Reprinted in Knox (ed.) (2006): 51–68.]
• ___. (2002) Ovid: The Poet and His Work, trans. G. M. Goshgarian (Ithaca, NY and London).
• James, S. L. (2003) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy (Berkeley). [esp. ch. 5]
• Kauffman, L. S. (1986) Discourses of Desire: Gender, Genre, and Epistolary Fictions (Ithaca, NY).
• Knox, P. E. (ed.) (2006) Oxford Readings in Ovid (Oxford and New York).

External links

• Latin text at The Latin Library
• Downloadable English Translation
• Perseus/Tufts: Commentary on the Heroides of Ovid