Heligmosomoides polygyrus
| Heligmosomoides polygyrus | |
|---|---|
| |
| Female H. polygyrus from the digestive tract of a woodmouse | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Nematoda |
| Class: | Chromadorea |
| Order: | Rhabditida |
| Family: | Heligmosomidae |
| Genus: | Heligmosomoides |
| Species: | H. polygyrus
|
| Binomial name | |
| Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Dujardin, 1845)
| |
| Synonyms | |
| |
Heligmosomoides polygyrus is a naturally occurring intestinal roundworm of rodents.[1] It belongs to the family Trychostrongylidae, and male and female worms are morphologically distinguishable.[2] The parasite has a direct lifecycle, with its larval form being the infective stage. H. polygyrus has the ability to establish chronic infections in rodents and alter host immune responses. This nematode is widely used as a gastrointestinal parasitic model in immunological, pharmacological, and toxicological studies.[3]
Taxonomy
[edit]The taxon consisted of the following subspecies:[4]
- H. polygyrus polygyrus, found in the Western Palearctic, infects Apodemus wood mice; cannot infect Mus without the help of powerful immunosuppressants. The synonyms N. dubius and H. linstowi both refer to this group.
- H. polygyrus corsicus, found in Turkey and Corsica, infects Mus
- H. polygyrus bakeri, found in house mice worldwide and Gambel's deer mice in California. All lab strains derive from a population isolated from a Californian Gambel's deer mouse in 1950.
- H. polygyrus americanus, found in a Western heather vole
In 2006, H. p. bakeri was proposed to be its own full species, Heligmosomoides bakeri, using genetic evidence. A 2010 article presents both genetic and phenotypic evidence. H. p. corsicus is closer to H. bakeri than to H. polygyrus proper under these two criteria, but the subspecies was too badly described to be moved.[4] A 2023 article presents full genomes from both species, unambiguously showing their genetic distance, which amounts to 1 million years of separate evolution.[5]
Lifecycle and morphology
[edit]This parasite has a direct lifecycle with no intermediate hosts. The lifecycle takes about 13–15 days to complete.[1][6] Infected mice pass faeces containing eggs, and egg sizes vary between 70 and 84 micrometres (μm) in length and 37 and 53 μm in width.[7] Eggs are shed from the host at the 8– to 16-cell stage and hatch in the environment, roughly 24 hours after passing through the host.[8] L1 larvae emerge from the egg and measure from 300–600 μm in length. Three lip-like structures can be seen around a rudimentary mouth. L1 larvae moult to L2 larvae after 2–3 days; they then begin feeding on bacteria in the environment. The L1-stage cuticle loosens from either end of the larvae, but remain loosely associated with the L2 larvae, becoming an outer sheath up until infection. After 3 days, the L2 partially moults into ensheathed L3, the infective nonfeeding stage. Infective larval stages measure 480–563 μm long.
Mice ingest the L3 stage of the parasite and after 18 hours, exsheathed L3 appears in the intestinal lumen. The L1 sheath is shed following ingestion, at which point the larvae shorten slightly and measure 376–540 μm in length. After 24 hours after ingestion, larvae invade the mucosal layer of the intestine. Around 4 days after ingestion, L3 moult into L4 in the submucosa of the intestine. At 6 days after ingestion, they encyst in the muscle layer of the intestine and start maturing in to adult parasites. By day 14, adult male and female worms contact in the lumen of the intestine, mate, and produce eggs that are passed in the faeces, thus continuing the lifecycle. Adult males are tightly coiled and usually measure 8–10 mm in length. The females are also tightly coiled, but larger, measuring 18–21mm in length. Adults are characterized by a dark red pigmentation, whereas the free-living larval forms are mostly translucent.
Epidemiology
[edit]In natural infections, H. p. polygyrus is found almost ubiquitously within populations of wild wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). In one study of wood mouse populations in Oxfordshire, England, 70% of all mice sampled carried an infection with H. p. polygyrus, with an average infection burden of about 12 worms per mouse.[9] Natural infection intensity displays high variability in wood mice, ranging from none to 244 adult worms per mouse. Male and female mice show equal parasitic burdens. Parasite occurrence appears to positively correlate with weight and age of the mouse, showing an increase in prevalence in older, heavier mice. Infection was also seasonally regulated in the wood mouse population, with highest prevalence of infection/worm burden intensity occurring in early spring and reaching their lowest values in late summer/early autumn. This is inversely correlated with typical breeding behaviors of the wood mouse, where the population peaks in late summer or early autumn, and is at its lowest in the early spring.[9]
The bulk of research on H. polygyrus (specifically H. p. bakeri) has been conducted on the laboratory mouse, Mus musculus, as it is used as a model of human helminth infection to which a spectrum of natural resistance to parasite infection exists.[6]
Pathogenicity
[edit]Upon infection with H. polygyrus, innate and adaptive host immune responses are generated to prevent the establishment of the parasite in the gut. A strong wound-healing immune response (Th2-type) associated with intestinal pathology is mounted. Similar to other roundworm infections, Th2 immunity focuses on eliminating the parasite or confining it to minimize host damage.
Mucus secreted by goblet cells of the intestine acts as the first line of defense, hence increases in goblet cell number are a major observable change during H. p. bakeri infection.[10] Macrophages are activated through Th2 cytokines and they are important in parasite clearance by increase intestinal motility and to induce fibrosis and healing.[11] These immune cells are also important in granuloma formation. This is a defensive response by the host to trap the parasite and minimize its damage to the gut. In addition, these cells are important in increasing contractions of the gut wall, which facilitates worm expulsion.[6] The spleen, mesenteric lymph nodes, Peyer’s patches, and lamina propria lymphocytes induce a strong Th2 immune response by producing different cytokines (Interleukin 3, IL4, IL5, IL9, IL10, and IL13), which are important in controlling and expelling worms. These cytokines aid in generating CD4 T helper 2 effector cells necessary for adaptive immune responses against the parasite. In addition, costimulatory signals via CD80 and CD86 have also be shown important in mounting a Th2 immune response and producing immunoglobulin E (IgE).[7] In the humoral arm of immunity, parasite-specific IgG1 plays a greater role in protection during infection, and IgA has been shown to have a minor effect. IgM and IgE have not been shown to be important in H. p. bakeri protection.
However, despite this impressive immune response, H. p. bakeri is able to hijack the host immune response, dampening the Th2 response generated against itself, resulting in chronic infection. This immune regulation occurs through a strong regulatory T cell response elicited in the spleen and the mesenteric lymph nodes of the host, mainly involving CD25+CD103+ regulatory T cells.[12] Another factor might be the production of H. p. bakeris alarmin release inhibitor (A0A3P7XL18), an IL-33-suppressive 26-kDa Sushi domain protein, inhibiting processing of IL33 into its active form.[13] H. p. bakeri also secretes a molecule that is a mimic of TGF-β, termed Hp-TGM (H. polygyrus TGF-β mimic, A0A2D1LW19).[14][15] Although Hp-TGM has no structural homology to mammalian TGF-β it is similarly able to bind to the TGF-β receptor complex and stimulate downstream signalling processes. These include driving the expression of FOXP3, the master transcription factor of regulatory T cells. Hp-TGM has been shown to induce populations of regulatory T cells in mice that had increased stability in the presence of inflammation in vivo.[16] Hp-TGM can also induce populations of human regulatory T cells from both naive and memory CD4+ T cells that were stable in the presence of inflammation.[17] As such Hp-TGM shows potential for development as a novel therapeutic to re-establish immune tolerance in inflammatory disease.
Prevention and treatment
[edit]No formal prevention strategies exist for control of H. polygyrus, although the parasite is susceptible to a number of drug treatments. Treatment of an infected mouse with pyrantel pamoate, ivermectin, or other anthelmintic drugs help clear infection and provide immunity to reinfection.[6] Furthermore, a cocktail of H. p. bakeri excretory-secretory antigens can be collected, and administered to mice in the presence of alum to induce sterilizing immunity before infection.[6][18]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b Gregory, Richard D.; Keymer, Anne E.; Clarke, John R. (1990-01-01). "Genetics, Sex and Exposure: The Ecology of Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda) in the Wood Mouse". Journal of Animal Ecology. 59 (1): 363–378. doi:10.2307/5178. JSTOR 5178.
- ^ al-Bassel, D. A.; Stietieh, F. M.; Farrag, A. M. (2000-04-01). "On the morphology of Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda-Trichostrongylidae) from the field mouse apodemus sylvaticus". Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology. 30 (1): 43–49. ISSN 1110-0583. PMID 10786017.
- ^ Pleass, R. J.; Bianco, A. E. (1995-09-01). "The effects of gamma radiation on the development of Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri in mice". International Journal for Parasitology. 25 (9): 1099–1109. doi:10.1016/0020-7519(95)00010-Y. PMID 8847171.
- ^ a b Behnke, Jerzy; Harris, Phil D. (November 2010). "Heligmosomoides bakeri: a new name for an old worm?". Trends in Parasitology. 26 (11): 524–529. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2010.07.001. PMID 20729145.
- ^ Stevens, L; Martínez-Ugalde, I; King, E; Wagah, M; Absolon, D; Bancroft, R; Gonzalez de la Rosa, P; Hall, JL; Kieninger, M; Kloch, A; Pelan, S; Robertson, E; Pedersen, AB; Abreu-Goodger, C; Buck, AH; Blaxter, M (27 November 2023). "Ancient diversity in host-parasite interaction genes in a model parasitic nematode". Nature Communications. 14 (1): 7776. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43556-w. PMC 10682056. PMID 38012132.
- ^ a b c d e Reynolds, Lisa A.; Filbey, Kara J.; Maizels, Rick M. (2012-10-11). "Immunity to the model intestinal helminth parasite Heligmosomoides polygyrus". Seminars in Immunopathology. 34 (6): 829–846. doi:10.1007/s00281-012-0347-3. ISSN 1863-2297. PMC 3496515. PMID 23053394.
- ^ a b Ehrenford, Frank A. (1954-01-01). "The Life Cycle of Nematospiroides dubius Baylis (Nematoda: Heligmosomidae)". The Journal of Parasitology. 40 (4): 480–481. doi:10.2307/3273905. JSTOR 3273905.
- ^ Bryant, Victoria (1973-09-01). "The Life Cycle of Nematospiroides dubius, Baylis, 1926 (Nematoda: Heligmosomidae)". Journal of Helminthology. 47 (3): 263–268. doi:10.1017/S0022149X00026535. ISSN 1475-2697. PMID 4796125. S2CID 2864785.
- ^ a b Gregory, Richard D. (1992-01-01). "On the interpretation of host-parasite ecology: Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda) in wild wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) populations". Journal of Zoology. 226 (1): 109–121. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1992.tb06130.x. ISSN 1469-7998.
- ^ Grencis, Richard K.; Humphreys, Neil E.; Bancroft, Allison J. (2014-07-01). "Immunity to gastrointestinal nematodes: mechanisms and myths". Immunological Reviews. 260 (1): 183–205. doi:10.1111/imr.12188. ISSN 1600-065X. PMC 4141702. PMID 24942690.
- ^ Filbey, Kara J.; Grainger, John R.; Smith, Katherine A.; Boon, Louis; van Rooijen, Nico; Harcus, Yvonne; Jenkins, Stephen; Hewitson, James P.; Maizels, Rick M. (2014-05-01). "Innate and adaptive type 2 immune cell responses in genetically controlled resistance to intestinal helminth infection". Immunology and Cell Biology. 92 (5): 436–448. doi:10.1038/icb.2013.109. ISSN 0818-9641. PMC 4038150. PMID 24492801.
- ^ Finney, Constance A. M.; Taylor, Matthew D.; Wilson, Mark S.; Maizels, Rick M. (2007-07-01). "Expansion and activation of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells in Heligmosomoides polygyrus infection". European Journal of Immunology. 37 (7): 1874–1886. doi:10.1002/eji.200636751. ISSN 0014-2980. PMC 2699425. PMID 17563918.
- ^ Osbourn; et al. (17 October 2017). "HpARI Protein Secreted by a Helminth Parasite Suppresses Interleukin-33". Immunity. 47 (4): 739–751. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.015. PMC 5655542. PMID 29045903.
- ^ Johnston, CJC; Smyth, DJ; Kodali, RB; White, MPJ; Harcus, Y; Filbey, KJ; Hewitson, JP; Hinck, CS; Ivens, A; Kemter, AM; Kildemoes, AO; Le Bihan, T; Soares, DC; Anderton, SM; Brenn, T; Wigmore, SJ; Woodcock, HV; Chambers, RC; Hinck, AP; McSorley, HJ; Maizels, RM (December 2017). "A structurally distinct TGF-β mimic from an intestinal helminth parasite potently induces regulatory T cells". Nature Communications. 8 (1): 1741. Bibcode:2017NatCo...8.1741J. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01886-6. PMC 5701006. PMID 29170498.
- ^ Smyth, DJ; Harcus, Y; White, MPJ; Gregory, WF; Nahler, J; Stephens, I; Toke-Bjolgerud, E; Hewitson, JP; Ivens, A; McSorley, HJ; Maizels, RM (April 2018). "TGF-β mimic proteins form an extended gene family in the murine parasite Heligmosomoides polygyrus". International Journal for Parasitology. 48 (5): 379–385. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.12.004. PMC 5904571. PMID 29510118.
- ^ White, MPJ; Smyth, DJ; Cook, L; Ziegler, SF; Levings, MK; Maizels, RM (2021-05-14). "The parasite cytokine mimic Hp- TGM potently replicates the regulatory effects of TGF-β on murine CD4 + T cells". Immunology & Cell Biology. 99 (8): 848–864. doi:10.1111/IMCB.12479. PMC 9214624. PMID 33988885.
- ^ Cook, L; Reid, KT; Häkkinen, E; de Bie, B; Tanaka, S; Smyth, DJ; White, MPJ; Wong, MQ; Huang, Q; Gillies, JK; Zeigler, SF; Maizels, RM; Levings, MK (2021-04-30). "Induction of stable human FOXP3 + Tregs by a parasite-derived TGF-β mimic". Immunology & Cell Biology. 99 (8): 833–847. doi:10.1111/IMCB.12475. PMC 8453874. PMID 33929751.
- ^ Hewitson, James P.; Filbey, Kara J.; Grainger, John R.; Dowle, Adam A.; Pearson, Mark; Murray, Janice; Harcus, Yvonne; Maizels, Rick M. (2011-11-01). "Heligmosomoides polygyrus Elicits a Dominant Nonprotective Antibody Response Directed against Restricted Glycan and Peptide Epitopes". The Journal of Immunology. 187 (9): 4764–4777. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1004140. ISSN 0022-1767. PMC 4306209. PMID 21964031.