Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary Tag: repeating characters |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{wikisource}} |
{{wikisource}} |
||
'''''Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections''''', {{ussc|383|663|1966}}, was a case in which the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] found that Virginia's [[poll tax]] was unconstitutional under the [[equal protection clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the |
'''''Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections''''', {{ussc|383|663|1966}}, was a case in which the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] found that Virginia's [[poll tax]] was unconstitutional under the [[equal protection clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the Unitjb;jhdsvjbsvjxbvljbcjbc;jbscvouhqdviohed States Constitution|14th Amendment]]. The [[Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution]] prohibited poll taxes in federal elections; the Supreme Court extended this prohibition to state elections. |
||
==Background== |
==Background== |
Revision as of 18:43, 27 September 2011
Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections | |
---|---|
Argued January 25–26, 1966 Decided March 24, 1966 | |
Full case name | Annie E. Harper, et al. v. Virginia Board of Elections, et al. |
Citations | 383 U.S. 663 (more) 86 S. Ct. 1079; 16 L. Ed. 2d 169; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2905 |
Case history | |
Prior | Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Holding | |
A State's conditioning of the right to vote on the payment of a fee or tax violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Douglas, joined by Warren, Clark, Brennan, White, Fortas |
Dissent | Black |
Dissent | Harlan and Stewart |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XIV |
Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966), was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court found that Virginia's poll tax was unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. The Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibited poll taxes in federal elections; the Supreme Court extended this prohibition to state elections.
Background
The case was filed by Virginia resident Annie E. Harper, who was unable to register without having to pay a poll tax. She brought the suit on behalf of other poor residents and herself. After being dismissed by a U.S. district court, the case went to the United States Supreme Court.
The Decision
In a 6 to 3 vote, the Court ruled in favor of Ms. Harper. The Court noted that “a state violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution whenever it makes the affluence of the voter or payment of any fee an electoral standard. Voter qualifications have no relation to wealth.”
This ruling reversed a prior decision by the Court, Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 277 (1937), which upheld the state's ability to impose poll taxes, and the Court did so despite the fact that there had been no relevant change in the text of the Constitution between 1937 and 1966. The Twenty-Fourth Amendment, adopted in 1964, outlawed the poll tax in federal elections, but did not speak to the question of state elections, which was the question involved in the Harper case.
Justice Black's Dissent
Black Dissenting: The court had allowed some forms of discriminatory voting qualifications without violating the equal protection clause, e.g. Lassiter v. Northampton (literacy test), Breedlove v. Suttles (poll tax on men), as long as it was rational. In this case, VA’s poll tax could be deemed rational because of state’s desire to collect revenue and the believe that people who pay to vote might have more interest in the state’s policies.[1]
See also
References
- ^ Issacharoff, Karlan, Pildes, Samuel, Pamela, Richard (2007). The Law of Democracy. Foundation Press. p. 41. ISBN 978-1587784606.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)