Jump to content

Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mtlchung (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tag: repeating characters
Line 21: Line 21:
}}
}}
{{wikisource}}
{{wikisource}}
'''''Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections''''', {{ussc|383|663|1966}}, was a case in which the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] found that Virginia's [[poll tax]] was unconstitutional under the [[equal protection clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|14th Amendment]]. The [[Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution]] prohibited poll taxes in federal elections; the Supreme Court extended this prohibition to state elections.
'''''Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections''''', {{ussc|383|663|1966}}, was a case in which the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] found that Virginia's [[poll tax]] was unconstitutional under the [[equal protection clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment to the Unitjb;jhdsvjbsvjxbvljbcjbc;jbscvouhqdviohed States Constitution|14th Amendment]]. The [[Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution]] prohibited poll taxes in federal elections; the Supreme Court extended this prohibition to state elections.


==Background==
==Background==

Revision as of 18:43, 27 September 2011

Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections
Argued January 25–26, 1966
Decided March 24, 1966
Full case nameAnnie E. Harper, et al. v. Virginia Board of Elections, et al.
Citations383 U.S. 663 (more)
86 S. Ct. 1079; 16 L. Ed. 2d 169; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2905
Case history
PriorAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Holding
A State's conditioning of the right to vote on the payment of a fee or tax violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
Tom C. Clark · John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Abe Fortas
Case opinions
MajorityDouglas, joined by Warren, Clark, Brennan, White, Fortas
DissentBlack
DissentHarlan and Stewart
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966), was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court found that Virginia's poll tax was unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. The Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibited poll taxes in federal elections; the Supreme Court extended this prohibition to state elections.

Background

The case was filed by Virginia resident Annie E. Harper, who was unable to register without having to pay a poll tax. She brought the suit on behalf of other poor residents and herself. After being dismissed by a U.S. district court, the case went to the United States Supreme Court.

The Decision

Chief Justice Earl Warren

In a 6 to 3 vote, the Court ruled in favor of Ms. Harper. The Court noted that “a state violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution whenever it makes the affluence of the voter or payment of any fee an electoral standard. Voter qualifications have no relation to wealth.”

This ruling reversed a prior decision by the Court, Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 277 (1937), which upheld the state's ability to impose poll taxes, and the Court did so despite the fact that there had been no relevant change in the text of the Constitution between 1937 and 1966. The Twenty-Fourth Amendment, adopted in 1964, outlawed the poll tax in federal elections, but did not speak to the question of state elections, which was the question involved in the Harper case.

Justice Black's Dissent

Black Dissenting: The court had allowed some forms of discriminatory voting qualifications without violating the equal protection clause, e.g. Lassiter v. Northampton (literacy test), Breedlove v. Suttles (poll tax on men), as long as it was rational. In this case, VA’s poll tax could be deemed rational because of state’s desire to collect revenue and the believe that people who pay to vote might have more interest in the state’s policies.[1]

See also

References

  1. ^ Issacharoff, Karlan, Pildes, Samuel, Pamela, Richard (2007). The Law of Democracy. Foundation Press. p. 41. ISBN 978-1587784606.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)