Jump to content

Gottschalk of Orbais

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Gottschalk (theologian))
This article is about the 9th century Saxon monk. For the 11th-century German monk, see Gottschalk of Aachen. For the 11th-century Slavic saint, see Gottschalk (Obotrite prince).
Part of a series on the
Reformation
Ninety-five Theses, written by Martin Luther in 1517
Precursors
Beginning
Contributing factors
Theologies of seminal figures
Protestant Reformers
By location
Major political leaders

Electors of Saxony

Counter-Reformation

Holy Roman Emperors

Political and religious conflicts
Art and literature
Painting and sculpture

Building

Literature

Theater

Music
Forms

Liturgies

  • Sequence (retained by Lutherans, mostly banned by Trent)

Hymnals

Conclusion and commemorations
Conclusion

Monuments

Calendrical commemoration

Protestantism

Gottschalk of Orbais (Latin: Godescalc, Gotteschalchus) (c. 808 – 30 October 868) was a Saxon theologian, monk and poet. Gottschalk was an early advocate for the doctrine of double predestination, an issue that ripped through both Italy and Francia from 848 into the 850s and 860s. Led by his own interpretation of Augustine's teachings on the matter, he claimed the sinfulness of human nature and the need to turn to God with a humility for salvation. He saw himself as a divine vessel calling all of Christianity to repent for decades of Civil War. His attempts of this new Christianisation of Francia ultimately failed, his doctrine was condemned as heresy at the 848 council of Mainz and 849 council of Quierzy. Following his conviction as a heretic Gottschalk remained stubborn to his ideology disobeying the ecclesiastical hierarchy, making him an "actual heretic in the flesh", for this disobedience Gottschalk was placed in monastic confinement; however the shockwaves his ideology sent around Western Christendom refused to stop reverberating, Gottschalk managed to win over more followers and the threat remained up until his death in 868.[1]

Early life

[edit]

Gottschalk was a child oblate at the monastery of Fulda under the tutelage of the Abbot Hrabanus Maurus of Mainz. Then, he was sent at Reichenau, he became close friends with Walafrid Strabo and Loup de Ferrières. In June 829, at the synod of Mainz, on the pretext that he had been unduly constrained by his abbot, he sought and obtained his liberty, withdrew first to Corbie.[2][3]

Priesthood

[edit]

Between 835 and 840 Gottschalk was ordained priest, without the knowledge of his bishop, by Rigbold, chorepiscopus of Reims.[3] Gottschalk's time at the Monastery of Corbie would have been formative in his development in both intellect and missionary ideology, Corbie being the centre for preparing missionaries.[4] Before 840 Gottschalk deserted his monastery and went to Italy, where he preached his doctrine of twin predestination, and entered into relations with Notting, bishop of Verona, and Eberhard, margrave of Friuli.[3]

He was however driven from Italy through the influence of Hrabanus Maurus, now archbishop of Mainz, who wrote two violent letters to Notting and Eberhard. Gottschalk travelled through Dalmatia, Pannonia and Noricum, while continuing to preach and write.[3]

Gottschalk was at Trpimir I of Croatia's court between 846 and 848, and his work De Trina deitate is an important source of information for Trpimir's reign. Gottschalk was a witness to the battle between Trpimir and Byzantine strategos, probably of Dalmatia, when Trpimir was victorious.

Predestination controversy

[edit]

Gottschalk returned to Francia after a decade of travels throughout Europe, during this time he had gained reputation for his teachings on predestination.[5] The key foundations of this belief that God had granted grace to a select few while denying it to those destined for Hell. This was a direct split from theological belief that God viewed humans acts with final judgement being based upon a person's nature and willingness to repent for sins, with God being able to deduce sinners and unrepentant.[6] Gottschalk strengthened his ideas throughout the 830s and 840s a period in which the Carolingian Empire was falling continuously into crisis,[7] in this time of uncertainty Gottschalk's teachings were clear wish for atonement, this message grew from the culture of the 820s–830s that saw Louis the Pious perform public penance, also inspired by Augustine.[8] This state of repentance had to be permanent, the daily prayer for sin and confession of sins that was accepted within [monastic] life had clearly not worked,[9] so a constant state of repentance was needed to keep from enticing God's wrath.

Gottschalk's heretical teachings went unopposed until the 848 synod of Mainz, here his old abbot Hrabanus presided over events now as Archbishop of Mainz, also present was King Louis the German. Gottschalk's libellus to support his theological belief was condemned as heretical.[10] Gottschalk was beaten by those present, before taking an oath never to return to Louis the Germans Kingdom of East Francia.[11] Gottschalk was a priest and monk from the archdiocese of Rheims, so was sent to the Archbishop Hincmar of Rheims for containment. This exposed the diocese of Rheims to the extreme theological issues that Gottschalk brought with him.

Ninth century heresies had largely been foreigners (Spanish or Greek), creating a great other for Carolingian theologians to use to define faith boundaries, the one exception was Gottschalk who continuously refused to renounce his beliefs.[12][13]

From Gottschalk's position of confinement he gained help from the monks at Orbais, where he had been previously contained. From this position Gottschalk sent his doctrine to all forms of ecclesiastical and lay authority. Gottschalk expected this to find support, he did in the scholar Ratramnus who composed ideas on predestination similar to those of Gottschalk.

Theology

[edit]

Gottschalk was influenced by the Augustinian soteriology,[14] which centered on a divine monergism,[15] and implied a double predestination.[16] However, unlike Augustine, Gottschalk explicitly argued for double predestination based on the immutable sovereignty of God.[14] He maintained that predestination was absolute, with God's will determining the fate of both the saved and the damned. His teachings attracted significant attention and controversy, ultimately leading to his condemnation as a heretic.[17]

At the heart of the controversy were the five propositions of Gottschalk. These can be summarized as follows:

1. God foreordains both the elect and the reprobate: Gottschalk argued that God, in his sovereignty, has predetermined not only who would be saved but also who would be damned. This double predestination was a central feature of Gottschalk’s theology.[18]

2. The certainty of salvation and perdition: Gottschalk asserted that the eternal destinies of individuals were fixed. Those elected by God could not lose their salvation, while the reprobate were inevitably destined for perdition.[19]

3. God does not will the salvation of all people: Gottschalk contended that God’s will was selective, choosing only the elect for salvation. He argued that when the Bible speaks of God’s desire for all to be saved, this "all" referred exclusively to the elect.[20]

4. Limited atonement: Consistent with his doctrine of predestination, Gottschalk believed that Christ’s atoning death was intended only for the elect, not for all humanity.[21]

5. Human freedom is limited to only evil: Gottschalk taught that humanity had no ability to choose good apart. After the fall, human will was bound to sin and incapable of turning to God.[22]

Council of Quierzy, 849

[edit]

The Council of Quierzy occurred six months after the Council at Mainz, when he was again questioned about his doctrine in an attempt to break his belief making him accept that the other bishops were correct. Gathered at this meeting were many notable including Archbishop Hincmar and King Charles the Bald the council was determined to prove Gottschalk's ideas incorrect and his readings of Augustine being wrong. Gottschalk allegedly burst into abuse following this refusal to accept the ideology of twin predestination.[23] In response to this Gottschalk was stripped of his priestly status, whipped, and held in custody at the monastery of Hauntvillers in silence.[24] Gottschalk was forced to burn the writings that he had taken to the council,[25] and was 'beaten nearly to death' on the command of lower ranking abbots not those in ecclesiastical office.[26]

Writings

[edit]

From the 17th century, when the Jansenists exalted Gottschalk [citation needed], much has been written on him. Two studies are F. Picavet, Les Discussions sur la liberté au temps de Gottschalk, de Raban Maur, d'Hincmar, et de Jean Scot, in Comptes rendus de l'acad. des sciences morales et politiques (Paris, 1896); and A. Freystedt, Studien zu Gottschalks Leben und Lehre, in Zeitschrsft für Kirchengeschichte (1897), vol. xviii.[3]

For many years he was believed to be the author of the Eclogue of Theodulus (Ecolga Theoduli) because both Theodulus and Gottscalk both mean "servant of God" in their respective languages, and because Gottschalk is believed to have known some Greek and the use of Greek names in the dialogue. This authorship theory was disputed by Karl Strecker in 1924. Strecker showed the writing style (poetic meter) of Theodulus was different. Most scholars now agree that Gottschalk was not the author of the Ecolga.[27]

Legacy

[edit]

There are multiple parallels with the views of Gottschalk and the Protestant reformers, which is why some see him as a forerunner of Protestantism. His views share most similarities with John Calvin, his similarities include the doctrine of justification by faith alone, which his views seem to have mirrored.[28][29][30]

The 17th century Anglican Archbishop James Ussher also sided with Gottschalk for his predestinarian views.[31]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Matthew Gillis, ‘Heresy in the flesh: Gottschalk of Orbais and the predestination controversy in the archdiocese of Rheims’, in Stone and West (eds.), Hincmar of Rheims, Life and Work, pp. 247- 267
  2. ^ Mayke de Jong, In Samuels Image: Child Oblation in the Early Medieval West, (Leiden, 1996), pp. 77-91.
  3. ^ a b c d e  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Gottschalk". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 12 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 279.
  4. ^ Gillis, 'Heresy in the Flesh'
  5. ^ Gillis, 'Heresy in the Flesh'
  6. ^ Celia Chazelle, The Crucified God in the Carolingian Era: Theology and Art of Christ's Passion, (Cambridge, 2001), pp. 165-209.
  7. ^ M. Costambeys , M. Innes and S. Maclean, The Carolingian World, (Cambridge, 2011), pp. 213-223.
  8. ^ Mayke de Jong, The Penitential State Authority and Atonement in the Age of Louis the Pious, 814-840, (Cambridge, 2011), pp. 228-34.
  9. ^ M. Driscoll, 'Penance in Transition: Popular Piety and Practice', in L. Larson-Miller, ed. Medieval Liturgy: A Book of Essays, (New York, 1997), pp.121-63
  10. ^ Gillis, 'Heresy in the Flesh' P 250.
  11. ^ Timothy Reuter, 'The Text - The Annals of Fulda', Ninth Century Histories,2.
  12. ^ Mayke de Jone, 'Religion', in R. McKitterick, ed., The Early Middle Ages, Short Oxford History of Europe, (Oxford, 2001), pp. 131-164.
  13. ^ Matthew Innes, '"Immune from Heresy": defining the boundaries of Carolingian Christianity', in Paul Fouracre and D. Ganz, eds, Frankland: The Franks and the World of the Early Middles Ages, (Manchester, 2008), pp. 101-125.
  14. ^ a b Sammons 2020, p. 40.
  15. ^ Barrett 2013, p. xxvii, ‌. "[D]ivine monergism is the view of Augustine and the Augustinians."
  16. ^ James 1998, p. 103. "If one asks, whether double predestination is a logical implication or development of Augustine's doctrine, the answer must be in the affirmative."
  17. ^ Bromiley, Geoffrey (1978). Historical Theology: An Introduction. pp. 165–170.
  18. ^ Bromiley, Geoffrey (1978). Historical Theology: An Introduction. pp. 165–170.
  19. ^ Bromiley, Geoffrey (1978). Historical Theology: An Introduction. pp. 165–170.
  20. ^ Bromiley, Geoffrey (1978). Historical Theology: An Introduction. pp. 165–170.
  21. ^ Bromiley, Geoffrey (1978). Historical Theology: An Introduction. pp. 165–170.
  22. ^ Bromiley, Geoffrey (1978). Historical Theology: An Introduction. pp. 165–170.
  23. ^ Florus of Lyon, 'Libellus de tribus epistolis', ed. K. Zechiel-Eckes, Opera Polemica, CCCM 260, (Turnhout, 2014, c. 24, pp. 198-9).
  24. ^ 'Council of Quierzy, 849', MGH Conc. III, no. 18, pp. 198-9.
  25. ^ Janet L. Nelson,'The Annals of St-Bertin', Ninth Century Histories 1, (Manchester, 2013), P. 67.
  26. ^ Florus, 'Libellus de tribus epistolis', ed. Zechiel-Eckes, c. 25, pp. 366-368.
  27. ^ Poetry and Exegesis in Premodern Latin Christianity: The Encounter Between Classical and Christian Strategies of Interpretation. (2007). Netherlands: Brill.
  28. ^ caryslmbrown (2017-07-18). "Reformation parallels: the case of Gottschalk of Orbais". Doing History in Public. Retrieved 2021-12-19.
  29. ^ Lockridge, Kenneth R. "Gottschalk "Fulgentius" of Orbais". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  30. ^ Strehle, Stephen (1995). The Catholic Roots of the Protestant Gospel: Encounter Between the Middle Ages and the Reformation. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-10203-3.
  31. ^ "Philip Schaff: History of the Christian Church, Volume IV: Mediaeval Christianity. A.D. 590-1073 - Christian Classics Ethereal Library". www.ccel.org. Retrieved 2022-03-15.

Sources

[edit]
  • Barrett, Matthew (2013). Salvation by Grace: The Case for Effectual Calling and Regeneration. Phillipsburg: P & R Publishing.
  • James, Frank A. (1998). Peter Martyr Vermigli and Predestination: The Augustinian Inheritance of an Italian Reformer. Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Sammons, Peter (2020). Reprobation: from Augustine to the Synod of Dort: The Historical Development of the Reformed Doctrine of Reprobation. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Egon Bondy wrote a study on Gottschalk, published in Bondy, Egon (1988). Gottschalk ; Kratés ; Jao Li ; Doslov (in Czech). Brno: Zvláštní vydání (published 1991). ISBN 80-85436-05-1.
  • Genke, Victor & Gumerlock, Francis X. Gottschalk & A Medieval Predestination Controversy (Texts Translated From The Latin) (Medieval Philosophical Texts in Translation) Marquette University Press, 2010. ISBN 978-0874622539
  • Gillis, Matthew Bryan. Heresy and Dissent in the Carolingian Empire: The Case of Gottschalk of Orbais Oxford University Press, 2017. ISBN 978-0198797586
  • Whitbread, Leslie George (intro and tr.). Fulgentius the Mythographer: The Mythologies. The exposition of the content of Virgil according to moral philosophy. The explanation of obsolete words. On the ages of the world and of man. On the Thebaid. Columbus, 1971.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Gottschalk_of_Orbais&oldid=1263932327"