Jump to content

Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Ghias-ud-Din Tughlak)

Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq
Sultan of Delhi
Ghazi Malik
Sultan-e-Dilli
Narpati-e-Dilli[citation needed]
A Jalayirid copy of a Delhi Sultanate manuscript, depicting ruler Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq leading his troops in the capture of the city of Tirhut, based on the Basātin al-uns by Muhammad Sadr Ala-i, a member of the Tughluq court and an ambassador to Ilkhanid Iran. Ca.1410 copy of 1326 original. Istanbul, Topkapi Palace Museum Library, Ms. R.1032.[1][2][3]
17th Sultan of Delhi
Reign6 September 1320 – 1 February 1325
Coronation6 September 1320
PredecessorKhusro Khan
SuccessorMuhammad bin Tughluq
Bornunknown
Died1 February 1325
Kara-Manikpur, India
Burial
Delhi, India
IssueMuhammad bin Tughluq
HouseTughluq dynasty
ReligionSunni Islam

Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq (Persian: غیاث الدین تغلق), or Ghazi Malik[a] (غازی ملک; died 1 February 1325[5]) was the Sultan of Delhi from 1320 to 1325. He was the first sultan of the Tughluq dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate. During his reign, Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq founded the city of Tughluqabad. His reign ending upon his death in 1325 when a pavilion built in his honour collapsed. The 14th century historian Ibn Battuta claimed that the death of the sultan was the result of a conspiracy against him.[4]

Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq was succeeded by his eldest son, Muhammad bin Tughluq.[6]

Early life

[edit]

Literary, numismatic and epigraphic evidence makes it clear that Tughluq was the Sultan's personal name, and not an ancestral designation.[7] His ancestry is debated among modern historians, because the earlier sources differ widely regarding it.[7] Tughluq's court poet Badr-i Chach attempted to find a Sassanid genealogy for his family from Bahram Gor, which seems to be the official position of the Delhi Sultanate. However this can be dismissed as flattery.[8] This is clear from the fact that another courtier Amir Khusrau, in his Tughluq Nama, states that Tughluq described himself as an unimportant man ("awara mard") in his early career.[9] Tughlaq Nama declares Tughlaq to have been a minor chief of humble origins.[10][11]

There are numerous views on the ancestry of Tughluq. Ranging from Turko-Mongol,[12] to Turkic origins,[13] mentioned by Ibn Battuta and Shams-i Siraj Afi. While it's debated but some sources suggest of him having a mother of Jat origin.[14]

Tughlaq began his career as a menial servant in the service of a merchant where he served as a keeper of horses before entering Khalji service.[15]

In Khalji service

[edit]
Silver Tanka of Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq Dated AH 724

According to Khusrau's Tughluq Nama, Tughluq spent a considerable time searching for a job in Delhi, before he joined the imperial guard of Jalaluddin Khalji.[9] Khusrau states that Tughluq first distinguished himself in the early 1290s, during the Siege of Ranthambore, in which the Khalji forces were led by Ulugh Khan.[9] Khusrau suggests that Tughluq was reduced to obscurity for a brief period after Jalaluddin was killed by his nephew Alauddin Khalji. This probably happened because, unlike many other nobles, Tughluq did not quickly change his loyalty to Alauddin.[16]

Nevertheless, it was during Alauddin's reign that Tughluq rose to prominence.[17] He entered the Khalji service as a personal attendant of Alauddin's brother Ulugh Khan. At the Battle of Amroha (1305), in which the Khalji army defeated a Mongol force from the Chagatai Khanate, Tughluq was among the chief subordinates of the Khalji general Malik Nayak.[16] During the 1306 Mongol invasion, Tughluq led the vanguard of the Khalji army, which was commanded by general Malik Kafur, and defeated the invaders.[18]

Alauddin appointed Tughluq as the governor of Multan, and then that of Dipalpur, both in present-day Pakistan. Ghazi Malik's armies mainly consisted of Jat tribesmen recruited from Dipalpur, who fought for him in all his battles.[19] These provinces were located in the frontier region of the Delhi Sultanate, and included the routes used by the Mongol invaders. The fact that Alauddin trusted Tughluq with such challenging assignments suggests that Tughluq must have gained reputation for his martial skills by this time.[16]

Khusrau states that Tughluq defeated the Mongols 18 times; Ziauddin Barani, in his Tarikh-i Firuz Shahi, states this number as 20. Ibn Battuta's Rihla mentions an inscription at the Jama masjid of Multan, which recorded Tughluq's 29 victories over the Tatars (Turko-Mongols). None of the authors provide a list of Tughluq's victories against the Mongols, but these victories probably included successes in border skirmishes.[16]

After Alauddin's death in 1316, Malik Kafur controlled the Sultanate's administration for a brief period with Alauddin's minor son Shihabuddin Omar as a puppet ruler. There is no record of Tughluq opposing Kafur during this period.[16] Kafur dispatched Ayn al-Mulk Multani to crush a rebellion in Gujarat, but was killed soon after, while Multani was in Chittor on his way to Gujarat.[20] Alauddin's elder son Qutbuddin Mubarak Shah then took control of the administration, and sent Tughluq to Chittor with a message asking Multani to continue his march to Gujarat. Multani welcomed Tughluq at Chittor, but refused to continue the march, as his officers had not seen the new Sultan in person. Tughluq then returned to Delhi, and advised Mubarak Shah to send firmans (royal mandates) confirming his position to Multani's officers. The new Sultan agreed, and as a result, Multani's force resumed its march to Gujarat. Tughluq accompanied this force, although Multani retained its supreme command.[20]

Rise to power

[edit]
Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq leading his troops in the capture of the city of Tirhut (1324), then ruled by the Karnats of Mithila. A 1410 Jalayrid Mongol illustration of the Basātin al-uns, a book written by Akhsatan Dehlavi al-Hindi, a member of the Tughluq court and an ambassador to Iran. Ca.1410 copy of 1326 lost original. Istanbul, Topkapi Palace Museum Library, Ms. R.1032.[21]

In July 1320, Mubarak Shah was murdered as a result of a conspiracy by his general Khusrau Khan, who became the ruler of Delhi.[22] Tughluq was one of the governors who refused to recognize Khusrau Khan as the new Sultan. However, he did not take any action against Khusrau Khan because the force commanded by him at Dipalpur was not strong enough to take on the imperial army at Delhi.[23]

Tughluq's son Fakhruddin Jauna (who later ascended the throne as Muhammad bin Tughluq), who was a high-ranking officer in Delhi, took the initiative to dethrone Khusrau Khan. He convened a secret meeting of his friends in Delhi, and then sent his messenger Ali Yaghdi to Dipalpur, asking his father for assistance in the matter.[23] In response, Tughluq asked him to come to Dipalpur with the son of the Uchch governor Bahram Aiba, who was also opposed to Khusrau Khan. Accordingly, Fakhruddin and his companions - which included some slaves and servants - left Delhi for Dipalpur on horses one afternoon. Tughluq sent his officer Muhammad Sartiah to take control of the Sirsa fort on the Delhi-Dipalpur route to secure a safe passageway for his son. When Khusrau Khan learned of the conspiracy, he dispatched his minister of war Shaista Khan in pursuit of Fakhruddin, but Shaista Khan could not catch the rebels.[24]

At Dipalpur, Tughluq and his son discussed the situation, and decided to put up a fight against Khusrau Khan.[24] Tughluq declared that he wanted to dethrone Khusrau Khan for "the glory of Islam", because he was loyal to Alauddin's family, and because he wanted to punish the criminals in Delhi.[25]

At Dipalpur, Tughluq and his son discussed the situation, and decided to put up a fight against Khusrau Khan.[24] Tughluq declareidentical letters to five neighbouring governors, seeking their support:[24]

  • Bahram, the governor of Uchch, joined Tughluq's cause and provided military support.[24]
  • Mughlati, the governor of Multan, refused to rebel against the new Sultan. Tughluq's friend Bahram Siraj incited Mughlati's army against him. Facing a rebellion himself, Mughlati tried to flee but fell into a canal built during Tughluq's governorship of Multan. He was beheaded by a son of Bahram Siraj, but the Multan army did not join Tughluq's forces against the Sultan.[24]
  • Malik Yak Lakkhi, the governor of Samana, not only refused to join Tughluq, but also sent his letter to Khusrau Khan and himself marched to Dipalpur against him. Yak Lakkhi was originally a Hindu slave, and may have been favoured by Khusrau Khan, which may explain his actions. After Tughluq's forces repelled his invasion of Dipalpur, he retreated to Samana. He was planning to join the Sultan at Delhi, but was killed by the angry citizens before he could do that.[24]
  • Muhammad Shah Lur, the governor of Sindh, was facing a rebellion by his officers when he received Tughluq's letter. He later came to terms with his officers, and agreed to support Tughluq, but reached Delhi only after Tughluq ascended the throne.[24] Tughluq later appointed him as the governor of Ajmer.[25]
  • Hushang Shah, the governor of Jalor and a son of Kamal al-Din Gurg, also promised to support Tughluq. However, he deliberately reached Delhi only after the battle between the forces of Tughluq and Khusrau Khan was over. Tughluq retained him as the governor of Jalor.[25]

Tughluq sent another letter to Ayn al-Mulk Multani, who had become the wazir by this time.[25] Multani was surrounded by Khusrau Khan's men when he received the letter, so he took the letter to the Sultan and expressed his loyalty. However, when Tughluq sent a second message to him, he expressed sympathy with Tughluq's cause. Multani stated that he was surrounded by Khusrau's allies, and therefore, would not take sides in the upcoming battle.[26] He told Tughluq that he would withdraw on the approach of Tughluq's forces to Delhi, and that Tughluq could choose to retain him or kill him upon becoming the Sultan.[25]

Mughal painting (c. 17th century) with imaginary depiction of the court of Ghiyath al-Din Tughlaq.[27]

According to Amir Khusrau, Tughluq's relatively small army consisted of warriors from a variety of ethnicities, including "Ghizz, Turks, Mongols, Rumis (Greeks), Rusi (Rus'), Tajiks, and Khurasainis." According to Khusrau, these soldiers were "people of pure birth and not racial mixtures". However, with the exception of a Mongol officer, Khusrau does not mention any soldiers from these ethnicities. According to historian Banarsi Prasad Saksena, Khusrau's enumeration of these ethnicities is "an official disguise" for the Hindu communities that fought for Tughluq, who claimed to be fighting for the "glory of Islam". The Khokhars were one of these communities: their ruler was Sahij Rai, and their chiefs included Gul Chandra and Niju. The Mewatis, also known as Meos, were another community of Hindu origin that supported Tughluq.[25]

Tughluq's officers captured a caravan carrying tribute from Sindh to Delhi, along with a number of horses.[25] Tughuq distributed the seized treasure among his soldiers.[28]

Meanwhile, in Delhi, to discourage any further conspiracies, Khusrau Khan consulted his counsellors, and ordered killings of Alauddin's three sons - Bahauddin, Ali, and Usman - who had earlier been blinded and imprisoned.[28]

Tughluq's army defeated Khusrau Khan's forces at the Battle of Saraswati and the Battle of Lahrawat.[29] Khusrau Khan fled from the battlefield, but was captured and killed a few days later.[30] Tughluq was proclaimed the new ruler on 6 September 1320.[22]

Reign

[edit]

Tughluq founded the Tughluq dynasty and reigned over the Sultanate of Delhi from 1320 to 1325.[31] Tughluq's policy was harsh against Mongols. He had killed envoys of the Ilkhan Abu Sa'id Bahadur Khan and punished Mongol prisoners harshly. He had fought various campaigns against the Mongols defeating them in 1305 at the Battle of Amroha. When Tughluq proceeded from Multan to Delhi, the tribe of Soomro revolted and took possession of Thatta. Tughluq appointed Tajuddin Malik as governor of Multan and Khwájah Khatír as governor of Bhakkar and he left Malik Ali Sher in charge of Sehwan.

In 1323, Tughluq sent his son Fakhruddin Jauna (later Muhammad bin Tughluq) on an expedition to the Kakatiya capital Warangal. The ensuing Siege of Warangal resulted in the annexation of Warangal, and the end of the Kakatiya dynasty.[32]

In 1323 he appointed his son Muhammad bin Tughluq as his heir and successor and took a written promise or agreement to the arrangement from the ministers and nobles of the state.

He also started construction of Tughlaqabad Fort.[4]

Death

[edit]
Mausoleum of Ghiyasuddin Tughluq in Tughluqabad.
See also: Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq's Tomb

In 1324, Tughluq turned his attention towards Bengal, then in the midst of a civil war. After victory, he placed Nasiruddin on the throne of West Bengal as a vassal state, and East Bengal was annexed. On his way back to Delhi, he fought and defeated the Raja of Tirhut (north Bihar) and annexed his territory. At Kara-Manikpur in February 1325, the wooden pavilion used for his reception collapsed, killing him and his second son Prince Mahmud Khan. Ibn Battuta claimed it was a conspiracy, hatched by his vizier, Jauna Khan (Khwajah Jahan).[4][33]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Ghazi means fighter for Islam;[4]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ ÇAĞMAN, FİLİZ; TANINDI, ZEREN (2011). "Selections from Jalayirid Books in the Libraries of Istanbul" (PDF). Muqarnas. 28: 230, 258 Fig.56. ISSN 0732-2992. JSTOR 23350289.
  2. ^ ÇAĞMAN, FİLİZ; TANINDI, ZEREN (2011). "Selections from Jalayirid Books in the Libraries of Istanbul" (PDF). Muqarnas. 28: 230, 258 Fig.56. ISSN 0732-2992. JSTOR 23350289. Another illustrated manuscript that is most probably from the time of Ahmad Jalayir. It is an unfinished copy of a work in Persian entitled Basatin al-Uns. The written sources emphasize the artistic patronage of Sultan Ahmad Jalayir.
  3. ^ William Charles Brice (1981). An Historical Atlas of Islam. Brill. p. 409.
  4. ^ a b c d Sen, Sailendra (2013). A Textbook of Medieval Indian History. Primus Books. pp. 89–92. ISBN 978-9-38060-734-4.
  5. ^ Jackson, Peter (16 October 2003). The Delhi Sultanate: A Political and Military History. Cambridge University Press. p. 330. ISBN 978-0-521-54329-3.
  6. ^ Tughlaq Shahi Kings of Delhi: Chart The Imperial Gazetteer of India, 1909, v. 2, p. 369.
  7. ^ a b B. P. Saksena 1992, p. 460.
  8. ^ Khaliq Ahmad Nizami (1997). Royalty in Medieval India. Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers. p. 8.
  9. ^ a b c B. P. Saksena 1992, p. 461.
  10. ^ Husain, Mahdi (1976). Tughluq dynasty. Chand. p. 31. OCLC 918427946.
  11. ^ Habib, Mohammad (2004). Hazrat Amir Khusrau of Delhi. New Delhi: Cosmo Publications. p. 67. ISBN 978-81-7755-901-9. OCLC 265982257.
  12. ^ ÇAĞMAN, FİLİZ; TANINDI, ZEREN (2011). "Selections from Jalayirid Books in the Libraries of Istanbul" (PDF). Muqarnas. 28: 231. ISSN 0732-2992. JSTOR 23350289. Muhammad Tughluq and his successors were contemporaries of the Jalayirid sultans; both dynasties were Turco-Mongol
  13. ^ Jamal Malik (2008). Islam in South Asia: A Short History. Brill Publishers. p. 104. ISBN 978-9004168596. The founder of this new Turkish dynasty...
  14. ^ Farishta. Tarikh-E-Farishta.
  15. ^ Host Kruger (1966). Kunwar Mohammad Ashraf An Indian Scholar And Revolutionary. Akademie-Verlag. p. 77.
  16. ^ a b c d e B. P. Saksena 1992, p. 462.
  17. ^ B. P. Saksena 1992, pp. 461–462.
  18. ^ Kishori Saran Lal 1950, p. 171.
  19. ^ Ashiq Muhammad Khān Durrani (1991). History of Multan:From the Early Period to 1849 A.D. p. 34.
  20. ^ a b B. P. Saksena 1992, p. 463.
  21. ^ ÇAĞMAN, FİLİZ; TANINDI, ZEREN (2011). "Selections from Jalayirid Books in the Libraries of Istanbul" (PDF). Muqarnas. 28: 230, 258 Fig.56. ISSN 0732-2992. JSTOR 23350289.
  22. ^ a b Mohammad Habib 1992, p. 447.
  23. ^ a b Mohammad Habib 1992, p. 450.
  24. ^ a b c d e f g h Mohammad Habib 1992, p. 451.
  25. ^ a b c d e f g Mohammad Habib 1992, p. 452.
  26. ^ I. H. Siddiqui 1980, p. 105.
  27. ^ See translation of the Persian title of the painting
  28. ^ a b Mohammad Habib 1992, p. 453.
  29. ^ B. P. Saksena 1992, pp. 453–456.
  30. ^ B. P. Saksena 1992, pp. 456–459.
  31. ^ "The COININDIA Coin Galleries: Delhi Sultanate: Tughluqs".
  32. ^ Richard M. Eaton (2005). A Social History of the Deccan, 1300-1761. Cambridge University Press. p. 21. ISBN 9780521254847.
  33. ^ Battutah, Ibn (2002). The Travels of Ibn Battutah. London: Picador. pp. 165–166. ISBN 9780330418799.

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
  • Atlas of World History, General Editor Prof. Jeremy Black, Dorling Kindersley
  • Futuh-us-Salatin by Isami, edited by Agha Mahdi Husain and was also published from Aligarh in three volumes (1967–77 CE)
  • A Critical Study of Futuh-us-Salatin by Aziz Bano, Head of the Persian Department, Moulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad, India
  • Lucy Peck. Delhi – A thousand years of building, Roli Books, ISBN 81-7436-354-8
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq.
Preceded by Sultan of Delhi
1320–1325 		Succeeded by
New dynasty Tughluq dynasty
1320–1325
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Ghiyath_al-Din_Tughluq&oldid=1260851691"