GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
| GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided June 1, 2020 | |
| Full case name | GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC |
| Docket no. | 18-1048 |
| Citations | 590 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards does not conflict with domestic equitable estoppel doctrines that permit the enforcement of arbitration agreements by nonsignatories to those agreements. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards | |
GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards does not conflict with domestic equitable estoppel doctrines that permit the enforcement of arbitration agreements by nonsignatories to those agreements.[1][2]
References
[edit]External links
[edit]- Text of GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, No. 18-1048, 590 U.S. ___ (2020) is available from: Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |