File talk:Repetition Code On AWGN Channel Graph.jpg
I've got a couple of issues with this page: 1. I don't understand the second graph, where the 'practical bpsk' line shows better performance than the theoretical (?best case) line. 2. One of the graphs has no axis labels, the other has BER and SNR; surely BER and Eb/No (with an explanation of whether or not that allows for the FEC) would be appropriate. 3. I've added some stuff about sharing bit probabilities when decoding so that it's obvious that using that approach would give better results. But I didn't add graphs/formulae to back it up. (It's self-evidently true, but I don't have a reference and am too lazy to derive it right now).
Start a discussion about improving the File:Repetition Code On AWGN Channel Graph.jpg page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "File:Repetition Code On AWGN Channel Graph.jpg" page.
