File talk:Freedom of Panorama world map.png

The map is wrong about Hellas, she has full freedom of panorama (at least since 1995), Hellas should be colored green as anything and anyone in public can be photographed and the photo be published or sold for non-commercial use, e.g. editorial/journalistic or artistic use. Joxi Szriasztista (talk) 21:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For more info on Joxi Szriasztista's bugreport, see the Signpost article HLHJ (talk) 13:44, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking specification of non-commercial use

Two questions:

why was this noted on its page?

countries with freedom of panorama for non-commercial purposes only are also shown in red

the statement

Non-commercial use of photos of buildings is not specified in this image.

might be considered vague. Are there no distinctions made regarding professed use of the photographs when examining the laws — an OR junction? Is status of ‘non-commercial use’ ignored? Is the previous quotation correct?

— JamesEG (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canada inconsistently represented

The legal state of Canada is not consistent between raster and vector versions. Does it allow interior photos in public buildings? The law quoted in wp:freedom of panorama seems to say yes, to me. HLHJ (talk) 13:44, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]