DescriptionQuality of relevant studies determined in systematic reviews commissioned by the Cass Review.svg
English: A bar chart visualising the quality of the relevant studies found and assessed in two of the systematic reviews, on puberty blockers and gender-affirming hormone therapy in adolescents, commissioned by the Cass Review.
The systematic reviews determined the quality of the relevant studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Low quality studies were discarded. All high quality and moderate quality reviews were included in the synthesis of results.
to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
Please help improve this media file by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related media files (how?), and so that it can be more easily found.
Please notify the uploader with
{{subst:Please link images|File:Quality of relevant studies determined in systematic reviews commissioned by the Cass Review.svg}} ~~~~
Captions
The quality of relevant studies determined in systematic reviews on puberty blockers and gender-affirming hormone therapy in adolescents commissioned by the Cass Review.