English: "Information credibility by presentation mode, information accuracy, and branding. Panel (a) shows the main results of Experiment 1: Presentation mode: F(2, 550) = 32.10, p < 0.001, η2partial = 0.11, information accuracy: F(1, 550) = 152.41, p < 0.001, η2partial = 0.22, presentation mode × information accuracy: F(2, 550) = 9.36, p < 0.001, η2partial = 0.03. Panel (b) shows the main results of Experiment 2: Presentation mode: F(2, 659) = 10.25, p < 0.001, η2partial = 0.03, information accuracy: F(1, 659) = 39.36, p < 0.001, η2partial = 0.06, branding: F(1, 659) = 0.001, p = 0.973, η2partial < 0.01, presentation mode × information accuracy: F(2, 659) = 5.89, p = 0.003, η2partial = 0.02, presentation mode × branding: F(1, 659) = 0.09, p = 0.911, η2partial < 0.01, presentation mode × information accuracy × branding: F(2, 659) = 0.16, p = 0.855, η2partial < 0.01. Bars represent estimated marginal means (exact values displayed within each bar), error bars show standard errors (exact values within parentheses). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons of significant two-way interaction (presentation mode × information accuracy) with Bonferroni adjustment. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 (two-tailed). Blue asterisks and brackets indicate significant differences in information credibility between low and high accuracy information within a given presentation mode. Gray asterisks and brackets indicate significant differences in perceived information credibility between two modes of presentation."