Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre
| Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided March 19, 2024 | |
| Full case name | Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre |
| Docket no. | 22-1178 |
| Citations | 601 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| A complaint about being put on the No Fly List is not moot simply because the government later took the plaintiff off the List. To show mootness, the government must disclose the conduct that landed the plaintiff on the No Fly List and ensure that they will not be placed back on the List for engaging in the same or similar conduct in the future. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Gorsuch, joined by unanimous |
Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre, 601 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a complaint about being put on the No Fly List is not moot simply because the government later took the plaintiff off the List. To show mootness, the government must disclose the conduct that landed the plaintiff on the No Fly List and ensure that they will not be placed back on the List for engaging in the same or similar conduct in the future.[1][2]
References
[edit]External links
[edit]- Text of Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre, No. 22-1178, 601 U.S. ___ (2024) is available from: Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |