Talk:Preterintention
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
preterintention: voluntary unlawful conduct which unintentionally carries out a more serious offence.
[edit]I have finished contributing. I want to point out that:
- a) some administrators asked me to remove references to all the countries in the world, and I did so;
- b) other administrators asked me to refer to all the countries in the world, and I will not do so: I am not schizophrenic yet;
- c) the sources are objective and not the result of original research: just indulge them;
- d) the language is correct: there are examples in brackets for the uninitiated;
Any discussion is useless: those who do not know diamonds will always treat them like stones.
Regards.
Post scriptum:
For administrators who doubt the sources given in the article, here are some sources that give the notion in native English:
4) I have respected the universal principle (of Wittgenstein's tractatus) of competence: I am a jurist, with a doctorate and a specialization on unintentional crime, aberratio ictus, aberratio delicti, aberratio cause, etc. In general encyclopedias it is not treated correctly: << ...European civil-law codes place a greater emphasis than do common-law systems on the dangerousness of the actor's conduct and the circumstances surrounding the act. Thus, bodily injury resulting in death and death that is a result of negligence rather than recklessness are more heavily penalized in European than in Anglo-American systems. Whereas in England death resulting from a crime is defined as murder only in the case of a few serious crimes, such as robbery or rape, European codes often punish any killer as a murderer if the culprit has employed a deadly weapon...>> . https://www.britannica.com/topic/homicide
5) THERE IS NOTHING ORIGINAL RESEARCH IN THE ARTICLE: THE SOURCE IS SCRUPULOUSLY INDICATED IN THE NOTE RELATING TO CONSOLIDATED AND BINDING LAWS OR JURISPRUDENCE SENTENCES. WE MUST RESPECT THE PILLARS OF WIKIPEDIA!:
https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research
6) The Wikipedia user needs an encyclopedic article that is correct in content, and the numerous notes in different languages serve to prove that everything is 100% correct;
for simple/incorrect descriptions there are already online resources: https://lawschoolbuddy.info/when-the-resulting-harm-is-greater-than-means-employed-by-the-offender/
Or
https://definition.homes/preterintencion/
Article title
[edit]When I accepted this, I moved it to "Preterintention" instead of "Praeterintention", as I believe this is the more common spelling in English contexts. It also corresponds to our wiktionary entry: wikt:preterintentional. -- asilvering (talk) 20:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. Your latest corrections no longer explain why the attempted misdemeanor is necessary; a lot of work for nothing. By now, it looks more and more like this:https://definition.homes/preterintencion/ This way of working is not my style; greetings. Joseph77237 (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Joseph77237, if there are sections you think need to remain in the article, that I removed, can you bring the text here for discussion? -- asilvering (talk) 16:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)