Draft:The Pool (magazine)
Submission declined on 13 January 2024 by BuySomeApples (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
The Pool
[edit]The Pool was an online women's magazine founded in 2015 by BBC Radio 6 DJ, Lauren Laverne and former editor in chief of Cosmopolitan and Red magazine, Sam Baker. According to Sam Baker, the vision for the website was for 'interesting, inspiring, original content for busy women.'[1] and was invested in by Fourteen17 [2]at its launch. [3]
| Format | Online women's magazine |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 |
| Country | United Kingdom |
Background
[edit]Laverne and Baker came up with the idea for the Pool in 2013 over coffee. Speaking to the Guardian, Laverne said '...we started kicking around the idea of doing something small and bloggy, and it grew and grew.'[3]
Columnists and contributors
[edit]At its launch it had the following columnists and writiers, Sali Hughes, Sasha Wilkins, Thomasina Miers, Laura Craik and Viv Groskop. [3]
Administration
[edit]The Pool went into administration in 2019.[4]
Notes and References
[edit]- ^ Banks, Tom (2015-04-08). "The Pool – a new multi-media magazine for "busy women"". Design Week. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
- ^ www.fourteen17.com http://www.fourteen17.com/. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help) - ^ a b c Jackson, Jasper (2015-03-30). "Lauren Laverne launches online platform aimed at women". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
- ^ "The Pool enters administration". The Bookseller. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.