Draft:BGG correspondence
Submission declined on 13 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand correspondence (BGG correspondence for short), established by Joseph Bernstein, Israel Gelfand, and Sergei Gelfand,[1] is an explicit triangulated equivalence that relates the bounded derived category of coherent sheaves on the projective space and the stable category of graded modules over the Exterior algebra . In the noncommutative setting, Martinez-Villa and Saorin R [2] generalized the BGG correspondence to finite-dimensional self-injective Koszul algebras with coherent Koszul duals . Roughly speaking, they proved that the stable category of finite-dimentional graded modules over a finite-dimensional self-injective Koszul algebra is triangulated equivalent to the bounded derived category of the category of coherent modules over its Koszul dual (when is coherent).
References
[edit]- ^ Joseph Bernstein, Israel Gelfand, and Sergei Gelfand. Algebraic bundles over and problems of linear algebra. Funkts. Anal. Prilozh. 12 (1978); English translation in Functional Analysis and its Applications 12 (1978), 212-214
- ^ "Martínez-Villa, M. Saorín, Koszul equivalence and dualities", Pacific J. Math. 214 (2004) 359–378
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.