This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.
Comment: A comment aside from the actual decline reason: that long list of publications is totally unnecessary; Wikipedia is not meant to be a comprehensive catalogue of someone's entire output. If you wish to make the point that this is a notable scientist, then make that point in narrative form, supported by reliable and independent sources. And if you wish, you can highlight a few of their more notable publications, that is possible also. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Indian Scientist
Dr. Anurag Varshney currently leads Drug Discovery and Development Research at Patanjali Research Foundation, Haridwar, India. He and his able team conduct research in Drug Discovery, Herbal Chemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology, Physiology, Cell Biology, and Nano-sciences. The current projects are centred around generating scientific evidence for traditional medicinal wisdom. He is also an adjunct faculty member at the Special Centre for Systems Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
List of research papers published in various globally renowned scientific journals by his name.
Comment: A comment aside from the actual decline reason: that long list of publications is totally unnecessary; Wikipedia is not meant to be a comprehensive catalogue of someone's entire output. If you wish to make the point that this is a notable scientist, then make that point in narrative form, supported by reliable and independent sources. And if you wish, you can highlight a few of their more notable publications, that is possible also. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:30, 28 November 2024 (UTC)