Diminished unison: Difference between revisions
BassHistory (talk | contribs) rmvd weak sources, following guidlines in WP:SPS |
BassHistory (talk | contribs) nominating for speedy deletion, "diminished unison" constitutes blatant misinformation |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{db-g3}} |
|||
'''"Diminished unison"''' is a non-standard and widely unaccepted term for the [[musical interval]] known as the '''[[augmented unison]]'''. Established main-stream [[music theorists]] do not consider the diminished unison as a legitimate [[Interval (music)|interval]]<ref>Kostka and Payne (2003). ''Tonal Harmony'', p.21. ISBN 0072852607. "There is no such thing as a diminished unison."</ref><ref name="Day and Pilhofer"/><ref>{{Cite book |
'''"Diminished unison"''' is a non-standard and widely unaccepted term for the [[musical interval]] known as the '''[[augmented unison]]'''. Established main-stream [[music theorists]] do not consider the diminished unison as a legitimate [[Interval (music)|interval]]<ref>Kostka and Payne (2003). ''Tonal Harmony'', p.21. ISBN 0072852607. "There is no such thing as a diminished unison."</ref><ref name="Day and Pilhofer"/><ref>{{Cite book |
||
| last = Surmani |
| last = Surmani |
Revision as of 13:54, 23 December 2010
This redirect may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as pure vandalism. This includes blatant and obvious misinformation, and redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism. See CSD G3.
If this redirect does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message. Note that this redirect may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation posted to the talk page is found to be insufficient.
Note to administrators: this redirect has content on its talk page which should be checked before deletion. Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google.This page was last edited by BassHistory (contribs | logs) at 13:54, 23 December 2010 (UTC) (14 years ago) |
"Diminished unison" is a non-standard and widely unaccepted term for the musical interval known as the augmented unison. Established main-stream music theorists do not consider the diminished unison as a legitimate interval[1][2][3] because the interval is made larger rather than smaller; it is instead called an augmented unison: C to C♭ is the same as C♭ to C.[2]
See also
Sources
- ^ Kostka and Payne (2003). Tonal Harmony, p.21. ISBN 0072852607. "There is no such thing as a diminished unison."
- ^ a b Day and Pilhofer (2007). Music Theory for Dummies, p.113. ISBN 0764578383. "There is no such thing as a diminished unison, because no matter how you change the unisons with accidentals, you are adding half steps to the total interval."
- ^ Surmani, Andrew (2009). Alfred's Essentials of Music Theory: A Complete Self-Study Course for All Musicians. p. 135: Alfred Music Publishing. p. 153. ISBN 0739036351. "Since lowering either note of a perfect unison would actually increase its size, the perfect unison cannot be diminished, only augmented.".
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)CS1 maint: location (link)