Jump to content

Creative Commons: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[pending revision][pending revision]
Content deleted Content added
Purbo T (talk | contribs)
m robot Adding: ksh:Creative Commons
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
| revenue =
| revenue =
| endowment =
| endowment =
| num_volunteers =
| num_volunteers = http://www.limohirelondon.org
| num_employees =
| num_employees =
| num_members =
| num_members =
Line 107: Line 107:
*[[Gnomoradio]]
*[[Gnomoradio]]
*[[Starfrosch]] Community MP3 Blog with a huge Creative Commons Section
*[[Starfrosch]] Community MP3 Blog with a huge Creative Commons Section
<!-- *[[BeatPick]] A creative commons music licensing site How many times BeatPick compares??? What is it? -->
<!-- *[[BeatPick]] A creative commons music licensing site How many times BeatPick compares??? What is it? -->http://www.limohirelondon.org
*[[Dogmazic]] - Archive of free music based in France, one of the main actor of free music movement in Europe.
*[[Dogmazic]] - Archive of free music based in France, one of the main actor of free music movement in Europe.
*[[Pragmazic]] - open-music store launched by the dogmazic team.
*[[Pragmazic]] - open-music store launched by the dogmazic team.
Line 263: Line 263:
[[uk:Creative Commons]]
[[uk:Creative Commons]]
[[zh:创作共用]]
[[zh:创作共用]]
http://www.limohirelondon.org

Revision as of 12:33, 29 September 2008

Creative Commons
Founded2001
FounderLawrence Lessig
TypeNon-profit organization
FocusExpansion of reasonable, flexible copyright
Location
MethodCreative Commons licenses
Volunteers
http://www.limohirelondon.org
Websitehttp://creativecommons.org/
Listen to this article
(2 parts, 7 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
These audio files were created from a revision of this article dated
Error: no date provided
, and do not reflect subsequent edits.

Creative Commons (CC) is a non-profit organization devoted to expanding the range of creative works available for others to build upon legally and to share.[1] The organization has released several copyright licenses known as Creative Commons licenses. These licenses allow creators to easily communicate which rights they reserve, and which rights they waive for the benefit of other creators.

Aim

Creative Commons Japan Seminar, Tokyo 2007

The Creative Commons licenses enable copyright holders to grant some or all of their rights to the public while retaining others through a variety of licensing and contract schemes including dedication to the public domain or open content licensing terms. The intention is to avoid the problems current copyright laws create for the sharing of information.

The project provides several free licenses that copyright owners can use when releasing their works on the Web. It also provides RDF/XML metadata that describes the license and the work, making it easier to automatically process and locate licensed works. Creative Commons also provides a "Founders' Copyright"[2] contract, intended to re-create the effects of the original U.S. Copyright created by the founders of the U.S. Constitution.

All these efforts, and more, are done to counter the effects of what Creative Commons considers to be a dominant and increasingly restrictive permission culture. In the words of Lawrence Lessig, founder of Creative Commons and former Chairman of the Board, it is "a culture in which creators get to create only with the permission of the powerful, or of creators from the past".[3] Lessig maintains that modern culture is dominated by traditional content distributors in order to maintain and strengthen their monopolies on cultural products such as popular music and popular cinema, and that Creative Commons can provide alternatives to these restrictions.[4][5]

History

File:GoldenNica CreativeCommons.jpg
Golden Nica Award for Creative Commons

The Creative Commons licenses were pre-dated by the Open Publication License and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). The GFDL was intended mainly as a license for software documentation, but is also in active use by non-software projects such as Wikipedia. The Open Publication License is now largely defunct, and its creator suggests that new projects not use it. Both licenses contained optional parts that, in the opinions of critics, made them less "free". The GFDL differs from the CC licenses in its requirement that the licensed work be distributed in a form which is "transparent", i.e., not in a proprietary and/or confidential format.

Lawrence Lessig, the founder and former chairman, started the organization as an additional method of achieving the goals of his Supreme Court case, Eldred v. Ashcroft. The initial set of Creative Commons licenses was published on December 16, 2002.[6]

Creative Commons was officially launched in 2001 with the support of the Center for the Public Domain. The project launch had additional support from students and fellows at the Harvard Law School and the Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society. Creative Commons is now headquartered at offices in San Francisco. The organisation is run by the Creative Commons Board and a small number of administrative staff and technical team, and is advised by a Technical Advisory Board.[7]

The project itself was honored in 2004 with the Golden Nica Award at the Prix Ars Electronica, for the category "Net Vision".

On December 15, 2006, Professor Lessig retired as CEO and appointed Joi Ito as the new CEO, in a ceremony which took place in Second Life.[8]

Creative Commons governance

The current CEO of Creative Commons is Joi Ito. Mike Linksvayer is vice president, John Wilbanks is Executive Director of Science Commons, and Ahrash Bissell is the Executive Director of ccLearn.

Board

The current Creative Commons Board includes: Hal Abelson, James Boyle (Chair), Michael W. Carroll, Davis Guggenheim, Joi Ito, Lawrence Lessig, Laurie Racine, Eric Saltzman, Molly Shaffer Van Houweling, Jimmy Wales, and Esther Wojcicki.[9]

Technical Advisory Board

The Technical Advisory Board includes five members. These are: Hal Abelson, Ben Adida, Barbara Fox, Don McGovern and Eric Miller. Hal Abelson also serves on the Creative Commons Board.[9]

Audit Committee

Creative Commons also has an Audit Committee, with two members. These are: Molly Shaffer Van Houweling and Lawrence Lessig. Both serve on the Creative Commons Board.[9]

A Creative Commons license was first tested in court in early 2006, when podcaster Adam Curry sued a Dutch tabloid who published photos without permission from his Flickr page. The photos were licensed under the Creative Commons Non-Commercial license.

While the verdict was in favour of Curry, the tabloid avoided having to pay restitution to him as long as they did not repeat the offense. An analysis of the decision states, "The Dutch Court’s decision is especially noteworthy because it confirms that the conditions of a Creative Commons license automatically apply to the content licensed under it, and bind users of such content even without expressly agreeing to, or having knowledge of, the conditions of the license."[10]

Jurisdictions

The original non-localized Creative Commons licenses were written with the U.S. legal system in mind, so the wording could be incompatible within different local legislations and render the licenses unenforceable in various jurisdictions. To address this issue, Creative Commons International has started to port the various licenses to accommodate local copyright and private law. As of February 2008, there are 43 jurisdiction-specific licenses, with 8 other jurisdictions in drafting process, and more countries joining the project.

See also: Creative Commons International

Projects using Creative Commons licenses

List of projects using Creative Commons licenses Several million pages of web content use Creative Commons licenses. Common Content was set up by Jeff Kramer with cooperation from Creative Commons, and is currently maintained by volunteers.

Sampling of CC adoption scope

This list provides a short sampling of CC-licensed projects which convey the breadth and scope of Creative Commons adoption among prominent institutions and publication modes.

Criticism

A number of critical positions are as follows:

  • A political position - Where the object is to critically analyze the foundations of the Creative Commons movement and offer an eminent critique (e.g. Berry & Moss 2005, Geert Lovink, Free Culture movements). One of the more notable concerns to be found in this vein of criticism is on the role that Creative Commons plays as an unconcerned corporate filter. As mentioned in Martin Hardie and "Creative License Fetishism", "When one examines closely just exactly what sort of 'freedom' is ultimately to be had within these licenses, one is quick to discover that they are primarily set up as tools meant to feed directly into corporate co-option." Matteo Pasquinelli (2008) describes two fronts of criticism: "those who claim the institution of a real commonality against Creative Commons restrictions (non-commercial, share-alike, etc.) and those who point out Creative Commons complicity with global capitalism". Pasquinelli specifically criticises CC for not establishing "productive commons".
  • A pro-copyright position - These are usually marshalled by the content industry and argue either that Creative Commons is not useful, or that it undermines copyright (Nimmer 2005).
  • That it worsens license proliferation, by providing multiple licenses that are incompatible. Most notably, 'attribution-sharealike' and 'attribution-noncommercial-sharealike' are incompatible, meaning that works under these licenses cannot be combined in a derivative work without obtaining permission from the license-holder.
  • That "it is not needed" or "it takes away user rights" (see Toth 2005 or Dvorak 2005).

Tools for discovering CC-licensed content

Audio and music

  • Electrobel Community - More than 10,000 electronic music songs released under one of the CC licences.
  • iRATE radio
  • Adrenalinic Sound - Italy
  • Gnomoradio
  • Starfrosch Community MP3 Blog with a huge Creative Commons Section

http://www.limohirelondon.org

  • Dogmazic - Archive of free music based in France, one of the main actor of free music movement in Europe.
  • Pragmazic - open-music store launched by the dogmazic team.
  • Jamendo - An archive of music albums under Creative Commons licenses
  • Phlow - Magazine that picks Creative Commons music and music from the Netlabel Community on a daily basis
  • CCMixter - A Creative Commons Remix community site.
  • Date a Conocer [www.dateaconocer.com] - A Spanish archive of music under Creative Commons licenses[11]
  • WYRR - A radio station that features Creative Commons music & allows listeners to download songs from its playlist.

Photos and images

See also

References

  1. ^ (Creative Commons FAQ)
  2. ^ "Founder's Copyright". Creative Commons. Retrieved 2006-04-07.
  3. ^ Lessig, Lawrence (2004). Free Culture (PDF). New York: Penguin Press. p. 8.
  4. ^ Ermert, Monika (2004). "Germany debuts Creative Commons". Register. 1: e9. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000009.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  5. ^ Lessig, Lawrence (2006). "Lawrence Lessig on Creative Commons and the Remix Culture" (mp3). Talking with Talis. Retrieved 2006-04-07.
  6. ^ "Creative Commons Unveils Machine-Readable Copyright Licenses". Creative Commons. 2002-12-16. Retrieved 2007-02-09.
  7. ^ History - CC Wiki
  8. ^ "Joi Ito Named Chairman of Creative Commons; Lawrence Lessig to Remain CEO and Board Member". Creative Commons. 2006-12-18. Retrieved 2008-06-01.
  9. ^ a b c People - Creative Commons
  10. ^ "Creative Commons License Upheld by Dutch Court". Groklaw. 2006-03-16. Retrieved 2006-09-02.
  11. ^ Música Libre - Date a Conocer

Articles

http://www.limohirelondon.org