Jump to content

Tulosesus impatiens

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Coprinellus impatiens)

Tulosesus impatiens
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Basidiomycota
Class: Agaricomycetes
Order: Agaricales
Family: Psathyrellaceae
Genus: Tulosesus
Species:
T. impatiens
Binomial name
Tulosesus impatiens
Synonyms[1]

Agaricus impatiens Fr. (1821)
Coprinarius impatiens Quél. (1886)
Coprinus impatiens Quél. (1888)
Pseudocoprinus impatiens Kühner (1936)
Psathyrella impatiens Gillet (1936)
Coprinellus impatiens J.E.Lange (1938)

Tulosesus impatiens
View the Mycomorphbox template that generates the following list
Gills on hymenium
Cap is convex or flat
Hymenium is adnexed
Stipe is bare
Spore print is blackish-brown
Ecology is saprotrophic
Edibility is inedible

Tulosesus impatiens (formerly Coprinellus impatiens) is a species of fungus in the family Psathyrellaceae. First described in 1821, it has been classified variously in the genera Psathyrella, Pseudocoprinus, Coprinarius, and Coprinus, before molecular phylogenetics reaffirmed it as a Coprinellus species in 2001. In 2020, German mycologists Dieter Wächter and Andreas Melzer reclassified many species of the Psathyrellaceae family based on a phylogenetic analysis and the species was renamed Tulosesus impatiens.

The fungus is found in North America and Europe, where the mushrooms grow on the ground in deciduous forests. The fruit bodies have buff caps that are up to 4 cm (1.6 in) in diameter, held by slender whitish stems that can be up to 10 cm (3.9 in) tall. Several other Coprinopsis species that resemble T. impatiens may be distinguished by differences in appearance, habit, or spore morphology.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

[edit]

The species was first described in 1821 as Agaricus impatiens by Swedish mycologist Elias Magnus Fries in his Systema Mycologicum.[2] In 1886, Lucien Quélet transferred the species to Coprinarius[3] (a defunct genus now synonymous with Panaeolus[4]) and then to Coprinus a couple of years later in his Flore Mycologique de la France.[5] In 1936, Robert Kühner segregated the genus Pseudocoprinus from Coprinus, including species that did not have deliquescent gills (that is, gills that "melt" into liquid), and he included Coprinus impatiens in this generic transfer. He later changed his mind about the taxonomic separation of Coprinus and Pseudocoprinus.[6] Gillet transferred the species to Psathyrella in 1936.[7] In 1938 Jakob Emanuel Lange published the new combination Coprinellus impatiens.[8] Despite the taxonomic shuffling, the species was popularly known as Coprinus impatiens until 2001, when a large-scale phylogenetic analysis resulted in the splitting of the genus Coprinus into several smaller genera, and the authors confirmed the validity of the generic placement in Coprinellus.[6] The specific epithet impatiens is derived from the Latin word for "impatient".[9]

A 2005 phylogenetics study proposed that C. impatiens was sister (closely related on the phylogenetic tree) to a large Psathyrella clade, and that consequently, the genus Coprinellus was polyphyletic.[10] A later (2008) study suggested, however, that these results were due to an artifact of taxon sampling—not enough species were analyzed to adequately represent the genetic variation in the genera. The 2008 study demonstrated that Coprinellus, at that time including T. impatiens, was monophyletic, descended from a common ancestor. In their analysis, T. impatiens was most closely related to T. congregatus, T. bisporus, T. callinus, and T. heterosetulosus.[11]


The species was known as Coprinellus impatiens until 2020 when the German mycologists Dieter Wächter & Andreas Melzer reclassified many species in the Psathyrellaceae family based on phylogenetic analysis.[12]

Description

[edit]
The cap surface has deep, narrow, radially arranged grooves.

The cap of the fruit bodies is initially egg-shaped, then conical to convex before flattening out, reaching diameters between 1.8 to 4 cm (0.71 to 1.57 in). It has deep narrow grooves reaching almost as far as the center of the cap. The surface color is a pale buff, tawny or cinnamon towards the center, but the color loses intensity when the mushroom is dry. The flesh is whitish, thin, fragile and barely deliquescent (auto-digesting). The gills are initially buff, then turn grayish brown. They are either free from attachment to the stem, or adnexed, meaning only a small portion of the gill is attached. The stem is whitish, very slender, and more or less equal in width throughout its length, or slightly thicker at the base; its dimensions are 7 to 10 cm (2.8 to 3.9 in) by 0.2 to 0.4 cm (0.08 to 0.16 in) thick. The stem surface of young specimens are pruinose—appearing to be coated with a minute layer of fine white particles; this eventually is sloughed off, leaving a smooth or silky surface. The odor and taste of the fruit bodies are not distinctive. The gills of this species do not autodigest with age, or barely do so; the fruit bodies tend to become more fragile with age.[13][14]

The spore print is dark brown. The spores are smooth, ellipsoid or almond-shaped, with a germ pore; they measure 9–12 by 5–6 μm. The spore-bearing cells, the basidia, are four-spored and tetramorphic (the spores lie on several different levels, and mature at different times). The cheilocystidia (cystidia found on the gill edge) are roughly spherical, 20–35 μm broad, or lageniform (flask-shaped), 36–64 by 10–15 μm, with the apex often rather acute, about 3–5 μm wide. Pleurocystidia (cystidia found on the gill face) are absent in this species.[13]

Tulosesus impatiens young fruit bodies

Similar species

[edit]
A potential lookalike species is C. disseminatus.

Coprinellus disseminatus resembles Tulosesus impatiens, but may be distinguished by its slightly larger fruit body, somewhat deliquescent gills, and tendency to fruit in smaller groups on the ground, rather than on or around rotting wood.[15] Also, C. disseminatus has smaller spores than T. impatiens, typically 6.6–9.7 by 4.1–5.8 μm.[16] Tulosesus eurysporus is similar to C. disseminatus but usually grows in groups on fallen branches, and has broader spores that measure 8.3–10.3 by 6.7–8.4 μm.[17] T. hiascens usually grows in small dense clumps, has narrower spores (typically 9–11 by 4.5–5.5 μm, and produces smaller fruit bodies.[13]

Habitat and distribution

[edit]

Tulosesus impatiens is found in North America and Europe[18] (including Germany,[19] Poland,[20] and Ukraine[21]) including northern Turkey.[22] In the Pacific Northwest region of the United States, it is found in Oregon and Idaho.[23] Fruit bodies grow solitarily, or rarely in small bundles, on forest litter in deciduous forests, especially ones dominated by beech.[18][24]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Coprinellus impatiens (Fr.) J.E. Lange". Index Fungorum. CAB International. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  2. ^ Fries EM. (1821). Systema Mycologicum (in Latin). Vol. 1. Lund: Ex Officina Berlingiana. p. 302.
  3. ^ Quélet L. (1886). Enchiridion Fungorum in Europa media et praesertim in Gallia Vigentium (in Latin). Paris: O. Doin. p. 119.
  4. ^ Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA (2008). Dictionary of the Fungi (10th ed.). Wallingford, UK: CAB International. p. 169. ISBN 978-0-85199-826-8.
  5. ^ Quélet L. (1888). Flore mycologique de la France et des pays limitrophes (in French). Paris: O. Doin. p. 42.
  6. ^ a b Redhead SA, Vilgalys R, Moncalvo J-M, Johnson J, Hopple JS Jr (2001). "Coprinus Pers. and the disposition of Coprinus species sensu lato". Taxon. 50 (1): 203–41. doi:10.2307/1224525. JSTOR 1224525.
  7. ^ Gillet CC. (1936). Bulletin Trimestriel de la Société Mycologique de France. 52: 33. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  8. ^ Lange JE. (1938). "Studies in the agarics of Denmark. Part XII. Hebeloma, Naucoria, Tubaria, Galera, Bolbitius, Pluteolus, Crepidotus, Pseudopaxillus, Paxillus". Dansk Botanisk Arkiv. 9 (6): 1–104.
  9. ^ Davidson GD, Robinson M (1996). Chambers 21st Century Dictionary. Edinburgh: Chambers. p. 676. ISBN 978-0-550-10625-4.
  10. ^ Walther G, Garnica S, Weiß M (2005). "The systematic relevance of conidiogenesis modes in the gilled Agaricales". Mycological Research. 109 (5): 525–44. doi:10.1017/S0953756205002868. PMID 16018308.
  11. ^ Padamsee M, Matheny PB, Dentinger BTM, McLaughlin DJ (2008). "The mushroom family Psathyrellaceae: Evidence for large-scale polyphyly of the genus Psathyrella". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 46 (2): 415–29. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.004. PMID 18248744.
  12. ^ Wächter, Dieter; Melzer, Andreas (2020-11-01). "Proposal for a subdivision of the family Psathyrellaceae based on a taxon-rich phylogenetic analysis with iterative multigene guide tree". Mycological Progress. 19 (11): 1151–1265. doi:10.1007/s11557-020-01606-3. ISSN 1861-8952. S2CID 228976812.
  13. ^ a b c Orton PD, Watling R (1979). Coprinaceae: Coprinus. Edinburgh, Scotland: Royal Botanic Garden. p. 93. ISBN 978-0-11-491565-0.
  14. ^ Jordan M. (2004). The Encyclopedia of Fungi of Britain and Europe. London: Frances Lincoln. p. 232. ISBN 978-0-7112-2378-3.
  15. ^ Arora D. (1986). Mushrooms Demystified: a Comprehensive Guide to the Fleshy Fungi. Berkeley, California: Ten Speed Press. p. 535. ISBN 978-0-89815-169-5.
  16. ^ Burel J. (2004). "Nekoprofilni druhy hnojniku subsekce Setulosi" [Profiles of species from Coprinus subsection Setulosi]. Mykologicky Sbornik (in Czech). 81 (3): 94–7. ISSN 0374-9436.
  17. ^ "Coprinus eurysporus M. Lange & A.H. Smith". Coprinus Studies by Kees Uljé. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  18. ^ a b Phillips R. "Coprinus impatiens". Rogers Mushrooms. Archived from the original on 2011-11-07. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  19. ^ Enderle M, Krieglsteiner GJ, Bender H (1986). "Studies in the genus Coprinus West Germany III". Zeitschrift für Mykologie (in German). 52 (1): 101–32.
  20. ^ Sadowska B. (1988). "Fungi of the genus Coprinus Pers. ex Fr. S.F. Gray". Biuletyn Lubelskiego Towarzystwa Naukowego Biologia (in Polish). 30 (1–2): 35–38.
  21. ^ Prydiuk MP. (2003). "Rare for the territory of Ukraine finds, of basidial macromycetes (Agaricales s. l, Lycoperdales) from Dnipropetrovsk region". Ukrayins'kyi Botanichnyi Zhurnal (in Russian). 60 (2): 138–45.
  22. ^ Türkekul I. (2003). "A contribution to the fungal flora of Tokat Province" (PDF). Turkish Journal of Botany. 27: 313–20. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-08-14. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  23. ^ "Pacific Northwest Distributions for Macrofungi". South Vancouver Island Mycological Society. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  24. ^ Lange M, Smith AH (1953). "The Coprinus ephemerus group". Mycologia. 45 (5): 747–80. doi:10.1080/00275514.1953.12024313. JSTOR 4547754.
[edit]