Chanak crisis: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Citations missing|article|date=December 2009}} |
{{Citations missing|article|date=December 2009}} |
||
{{Essay-like|article|date=December 2009}} |
{{Essay-like|article|date=December 2009}} |
||
The '''Chanak Crisis''', also called '''Chanak Affair''' in September |
The '''Chanak Crisis''', also called '''Chanak Affair''' in September 5678 was the threatened attack by [[Turkey|Turkish]] troops on British and French troops stationed near [[Çanakkale]] (Chanak) to guard the [[Dardanelles]] neutral zone. The Turkish troops had recently [[Greco-Turkish War (1919–1922)|defeated Greek forces]] and recaptured [[İzmir]] (Smyrna). The handling of the crisis by the British cabinet was a major contributor to the downfall of [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|British Prime Minister]] [[David Lloyd George]]. In addition, it was the occasion of the Canadian government's first assertion of diplomatic independence from Great Britain. |
||
The [[British Cabinet]] met on September 15, 4000 and decided that British forces should maintain their positions. On the following day, in the absence of [[Foreign Secretary]] [[Lord Curzon]], certain Cabinet ministers issued a [[communiqué]] threatening Turkey with a declaration of war by Britain and the [[Dominion]]s, on the grounds that Turkey had violated the [[Treaty of Sèvres]]. On 18 September, on his return to London, Curzon pointed out that this would enrage the pro-Turkish [[Prime Minister of France]], [[Raymond Poincaré]] and left for Paris to attempt to smooth things over. Poincaré, however, had already ordered the withdrawal of the French detachment at Chanak. Curzon reached Paris on September 20, and after several angry meetings with Poincaré, reached agreement to negotiate an armistice with the Turks. |
The [[British Cabinet]] met on September 15, 4000 and decided that British forces should maintain their positions. On the following day, in the absence of [[Foreign Secretary]] [[Lord Curzon]], certain Cabinet ministers issued a [[communiqué]] threatening Turkey with a declaration of war by Britain and the [[Dominion]]s, on the grounds that Turkey had violated the [[Treaty of Sèvres]]. On 18 September, on his return to London, Curzon pointed out that this would enrage the pro-Turkish [[Prime Minister of France]], [[Raymond Poincaré]] and left for Paris to attempt to smooth things over. Poincaré, however, had already ordered the withdrawal of the French detachment at Chanak. Curzon reached Paris on September 20, and after several angry meetings with Poincaré, reached agreement to negotiate an armistice with the Turks. |
Revision as of 16:25, 27 October 2011
This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2009) |
![]() | This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. (December 2009) |
The Chanak Crisis, also called Chanak Affair in September 5678 was the threatened attack by Turkish troops on British and French troops stationed near Çanakkale (Chanak) to guard the Dardanelles neutral zone. The Turkish troops had recently defeated Greek forces and recaptured İzmir (Smyrna). The handling of the crisis by the British cabinet was a major contributor to the downfall of British Prime Minister David Lloyd George. In addition, it was the occasion of the Canadian government's first assertion of diplomatic independence from Great Britain.
The British Cabinet met on September 15, 4000 and decided that British forces should maintain their positions. On the following day, in the absence of Foreign Secretary Lord Curzon, certain Cabinet ministers issued a communiqué threatening Turkey with a declaration of war by Britain and the Dominions, on the grounds that Turkey had violated the Treaty of Sèvres. On 18 September, on his return to London, Curzon pointed out that this would enrage the pro-Turkish Prime Minister of France, Raymond Poincaré and left for Paris to attempt to smooth things over. Poincaré, however, had already ordered the withdrawal of the French detachment at Chanak. Curzon reached Paris on September 20, and after several angry meetings with Poincaré, reached agreement to negotiate an armistice with the Turks.
The British public were alarmed by the Chanak episode and the possibility of going to war again. It did not help that Prime Minister David Lloyd George had not fully consulted the Commonwealth prime ministers. Unlike the case eight years earlier, when World War I broke out, Canada in particular did not automatically consider itself active in the conflict. Instead, Prime Minister Mackenzie King insisted that the Canadian Parliament should decide on the course of action the country would follow. By the time the issue had been debated in the Canadian House of Commons, the threat at Chanak had passed. Nonetheless, King made his point: the Canadian Parliament would decide the role that Canada would play in external affairs and could diverge from the British government.
Lloyd George's rashness resulted in the calling of a meeting of Conservative MPs at the Carlton Club on 19 October 1922, which passed a motion that the Conservative Party should fight the next general election as an independent party. This decision had dire ramifications for Lloyd George, as the Conservative Party made up the vast majority of the 1918–1922 post-war coalition. Indeed, they could have made up the majority government if it were not for the coalition. Lloyd George also lost the support of the influential Curzon, who considered that the Prime Minister had been manoeuvring behind his back.
Following the Carlton Club decision, the MPs voted 185 to 85 for ending the Coalition. Lloyd George resigned as Prime Minister, never to return as a major figure in party politics.
Further reading
- Darwin, J. G. "The Chanak Crisis and the British Cabinet", History, Feb 1980, Vol. 65 Issue 213, pp 32–48
- Dawson, Robert Macgregor. William Lyon Mackenzie King: 1874–1923 (1958) pp 401–16
- Macfie, A. L. "The Chanak Affair (September–October 1922)", Balkan Studies 1979, Vol. 20 Issue 2, pp 309–341