Jump to content

Category 5 cable: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: section blanking
Tag: section blanking
Line 84: Line 84:


The Communications Cable and Connectivity Association, Inc.(CCCA) cautioned that many low end communications cable products could present significant fire risk. In response to concerns from the industry, the CCCA commissioned an independent laboratory to analyze whether nine randomly selected low end samples of these products met U.S. minimum requirements for performance and safety. Test results showed that none of the samples fully met all of the minimum requirements and eight of the nine samples failed to meet the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) minimum code requirements for low flame spread and/or smoke safety requirements for installation in commercial buildings, schools and multi-tenant residences. Many of the samples failed the flame spread and smoke tests catastrophically. Because of the seriousness of these safety concerns, the CCCA plans to work in cooperation with the major leading independent telecommunications industry testing agencies to establish a new product certification program. Although details of the proposed program have not yet been established, a key component will be independent laboratory testing of structured cabling products that have been procured from point–of-sale locations.<ref>[http://www.cccassoc.org/news/CCCA%20-Cable%20Test%20Results%20slides%20Final.pdf cccassoc.org - Report on offshore cable]</ref>.
The Communications Cable and Connectivity Association, Inc.(CCCA) cautioned that many low end communications cable products could present significant fire risk. In response to concerns from the industry, the CCCA commissioned an independent laboratory to analyze whether nine randomly selected low end samples of these products met U.S. minimum requirements for performance and safety. Test results showed that none of the samples fully met all of the minimum requirements and eight of the nine samples failed to meet the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) minimum code requirements for low flame spread and/or smoke safety requirements for installation in commercial buildings, schools and multi-tenant residences. Many of the samples failed the flame spread and smoke tests catastrophically. Because of the seriousness of these safety concerns, the CCCA plans to work in cooperation with the major leading independent telecommunications industry testing agencies to establish a new product certification program. Although details of the proposed program have not yet been established, a key component will be independent laboratory testing of structured cabling products that have been procured from point–of-sale locations.<ref>[http://www.cccassoc.org/news/CCCA%20-Cable%20Test%20Results%20slides%20Final.pdf cccassoc.org - Report on offshore cable]</ref>.

===Copper clad Aluminum===
{{Unreferenced section|date=September 2009}}
{{Cleanup-section|date=September 2009}}
The American market had also been flooded with copper clad cable imported mostly from China and falsely presenting itself on the market as being a 100% copper Cat 5e cable. With less copper involved in the manufacturing process cost to the consumer is priced lower while lying to the consumer and not getting a true 100% copper Cat 5e cable.

Installation of copper clad aluminum Cat 5e wire has also been proven — by low voltage contractors in the Southern California market where this cable first arrived — to have poor test results and often not passing the Category 5e standard. Being that copper conducts electricity better than aluminum, signal strength has also been proven to be very weak over long cable runs.

Some manufacturer have also falsely presented Cat 5e cable conductors as being 24 [[American wire gauge|AWG]]. In actuality a 26 AWG conductor has been sold and is very hard to notice unless further examination under the sheath of the conductor is reviewed. A 26 AWG Cat 5e cable will not make proper contact on Cat 5e jack modules as most jack modules are 22 or 24 AWG required.<ref name="yahoo_store-File0003">{{cite web|title=Cat5E 90 deg HD Data Jack Module|url=http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/yhst-62665683816747/File0003.pdf}} 090901 lib.store.yahoo.net TIA/EIA-568-B.2 compliant data jack</ref>

The United States Federal Government will not accept bids from China made Cat 5e cable due to China being absent from the [[Trade Agreements Act of 1979]]. In general, a product is "TAA compliant" if it's made in the United States or a "Designated Country."


===Cat 5e “350 MHz” The Debacle===
===Cat 5e “350 MHz” The Debacle===

Revision as of 17:48, 29 September 2009

Category 5 patch cable in TIA/EIA-568-B wiring

Category 5 cable, is a twisted pair high signal integrity cable type often referred to as Cat5. Most cables are unshielded relying on the twisted pair design for noise rejection, and some are shielded. Category 5 has been superseded by the Category 5e specification structured cabling for computer networks such as Ethernet, and is also used to carry many other signals such as basic voice services, token ring, and ATM (at up to 155 Mbit/s, over short distances).

Usage and wiring methods

8P8C modular plug pin positioning
TIA/EIA-568-B.1-2001 T568A Wiring
Pin Pair Wire Color
1 3 1 Pair 3 Wire 1 white/green
2 3 2 Pair 3 Wire 2 green
3 2 1 Pair 2 Wire 1 white/orange
4 1 2 Pair 1 Wire 2 blue
5 1 1 Pair 1 Wire 1 white/blue
6 2 2 Pair 2 Wire 2 orange
7 4 1 Pair 4 Wire 1 white/brown
8 4 2 Pair 4 Wire 2 brown
TIA/EIA-568-B.1-2001 T568B Wiring[1]
Pin Pair Wire Color
1 2 1 Pair 2 Wire 1 white/orange
2 2 2 Pair 2 Wire 2 orange
3 3 1 Pair 3 Wire 1 white/green
4 1 2 Pair 1 Wire 2 blue
5 1 1 Pair 1 Wire 1 white/blue
6 3 2 Pair 3 Wire 2 green
7 4 1 Pair 4 Wire 1 white/brown
8 4 2 Pair 4 Wire 2 brown
Image of partially stripped cable showing the twisted pairs.
Image of a Cat 5E Wall outlet showing the two wiring schemes: A for T568A, B for T568B.

its ok

,,,,,,,\o/,,,,,,/\,,,,,,,, shark attack thats the answer

TURN YOUR SWAG ON

The Communications Cable and Connectivity Association, Inc.(CCCA) cautioned that many low end communications cable products could present significant fire risk. In response to concerns from the industry, the CCCA commissioned an independent laboratory to analyze whether nine randomly selected low end samples of these products met U.S. minimum requirements for performance and safety. Test results showed that none of the samples fully met all of the minimum requirements and eight of the nine samples failed to meet the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) minimum code requirements for low flame spread and/or smoke safety requirements for installation in commercial buildings, schools and multi-tenant residences. Many of the samples failed the flame spread and smoke tests catastrophically. Because of the seriousness of these safety concerns, the CCCA plans to work in cooperation with the major leading independent telecommunications industry testing agencies to establish a new product certification program. Although details of the proposed program have not yet been established, a key component will be independent laboratory testing of structured cabling products that have been procured from point–of-sale locations.[2].

Cat 5e “350 MHz” The Debacle

[dubiousdiscuss]

The 350 MHz term started a couple of years before the arrival of Category 6 cable by the Belden Electronics Division and promised better performance. Although the performance of this new 350 MHz cable was slightly better it was an easy way to sell the consumer on future proofing their needs while charging around 15% more and leading to a higher margin on the 350 MHz cable than the standard 5e cable. Soon after many other manufactures also offered a 350 MHz cable and followed the trend of an easy way to add to a higher margin. Some low-end cable manufacturers have the term “tested to 350 MHz,” printed on the jacket as a way to appear to the consumer that they are receiving a higher end of 5e cable, but the cable was only “tested to 350 MHz” and no promise of a performance guarantee is ever mentioned.

As the 350 cable and term gained momentum many manufacturers began offering a 400 MHz 5e cable [3] a 550 MHz 5e cable and so on. This led to the consumer and communications contractor assuming and leaving them confused that the higher a MHz rating meant for a better performing cable. The arrival of the Category 6 cable standard which specified a delivered performance at 250 MHz left many people confused.

EIA Electronic Industries Alliance / TIA Telecommunications Industry Association only recognize the Category 5e standard TIA/EIA-568-B.2-2001 as guaranteeing performance of Attenuation, NEXT, Power-sum NEXT, ACR, Power-sum ACR, ELFEXT, Power-sum ELFEXT, Return loss, Propagation delay and delay skew at 100 MHz. No standard is issued for 350 MHz cable and upon review of manufacturer spec sheets such as General Cable,[4] Superior Essex,[5] and Berktek [6] show us different performance numbers for 350 MHz. With no standard for 350 MHz cable, promised performance, if any, will vary from manufacturer to manufacturer and leave the consumer and contractor to continue to be confused.

Conductors Required

10BASE-TX and 100BASE-TX ethernet connections require two cable pairs. 1000BASE-TX ethernet connections require four cable pairs. Four pair cable is by far most commonly available type.

Bending radius

Most Cat.5 cables can be bent at a radius approximately 4 times the diameter of the cable.[7]

Electrical characteristics for Cat.5e UTP

Property Nominal Value Tolerance Unit ref
Characteristic impedance @ 100 MHz 100 ± 15 Ω [8]
Nominal characteristic impedance @ 100 MHz 100 ± 5 Ω [8]
DC-Loop resistance ≤ 0.188 Ω/m [8]
Propagation speed 0.64 c [8]
Propagation delay 4.80-5.30 ns/m [8]
Delay skew < 100 MHz <0.20 ns/m [8]
Capacitance at 800 Hz 52 pF/m [8]
Inductance 525 nH/m [9]
Cutoff frequency 50323 Hz [9]
Max tensile load, during installation 100 N [8]
Wire size AWG-24 (0.205 mm² ) [8][10]
Insulation thickness 0.245 mm [8]
Maximum current per conductor 0.577 A [10]
Temperature operating -55 to +60 °C [8]

Dielectric

Example materials used as dielectric in the cable:

Acronym Material
PE Polyethylene
FP Foamed polyethylene
FEP Teflon / Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene
FFEP Foamed Teflon / Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene
AD/PE Air dielectric / Polyethylene

[11]


Individual twist lengths

By altering the length of each twist, crosstalk is reduced, without affecting the impedance.[9]

Pair color [cm] per turn Turns per [m]
Green 1.53 65.2
Blue 1.54 64.8
Orange 1.78 56.2
Brown 1.94 51.7

[9]

Environmental ratings

US & Canada Fire certifications:

Class Acronym Standards
CMP Plenum CSA FT7 or NFPA 262 (UL 910)
CMR Riser UL 1666
CMG General purpose CSA FT4
CM UL 1685 (UL 1581, Sec. 1160) Vertical-Tray
CMX Residential UL 1581, Sec. 1080 (VW-1)
CMH CSA FT1

[12][13]

Where CMR can be replaced by a CMP and so on, due better rating. CM stands for Communications Cable.[12]

Some cables are "UV rated" meaning they can be exposed to outdoor UV radiation without significant destruction. The materials used for the mantle are usually PVC.[14]

Any cable which contains air spaces can breathe in moisture, especially if the cable runs between indoor and outdoor spaces. Warm moist air can cause condensation inside the colder parts of the cable outdoors. It may be necessary to take precautions such as sealing the ends of the cables. Some cables are suitable for "direct burial", but this usually requires that the cable is gel filled in order to hinder moisture migration into the cable.

When using a cable for a tower, attention must be given to vertical cable runs which may channel water into sensitive indoor equipment.[15] This can often be solved by adding a drip-loop at the bottom of the run of cable.

Plenum rated cables are slower to burn and produce less smoke than cables using a mantle of materials like PVC. This also affect legal requirements for a fire sprinkler system. That is if a plenum rated cable is used, sprinkler requirement may be eliminated.[16]

Shielded cables (FTP/STP) are useful for environments where proximity to power cables, RF equipment, or high power equipment may introduce crosstalk, and can also be used where interference with radio receivers or where eavesdropping likelihood should be minimised.

See also

References

  1. ^ "ANSI/TIA/EIA-568-B.1-2001 Approved: April 12, 2001 ; Commercial Building Telecommunications Cabling Standard Part 1: General Requirements" (PDF). 090917 nag.ru
  2. ^ cccassoc.org - Report on offshore cable
  3. ^ Tested to 400 MHz
  4. ^ 350 General Spec Sheet
  5. ^ Superior Essex 350 spec sheet
  6. ^ Berktek 350 Spec sheet
  7. ^ "Selecting coax and twisted-pair cable - Electronic Products". 081216 www2.electronicproducts.com
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "SuperCat OUTDOOR CAT 5e U/UTP" (PDF). 080319 draka.com
  9. ^ a b c d "Transmission Line Zo". 090113 prc68.com
  10. ^ a b "American Wire Gauge table and AWG Electrical Current Load Limits". 081220 powerstream.com
  11. ^ "UL Listed / ISO 9001 Compliant". 090127 unioncopper.com
  12. ^ a b "CSA Flame Test Ratings". 090126 74.125.77.132
  13. ^ "22Technical Information" (PDF).[dead link] 090126 belden.com
  14. ^ "CAT5e CMR/CMX mean it's uv rated ? - dslreports.com". 090126 broadbandreports.com
  15. ^ "A dumb mistake a green WISP operator once made. - dslreports.com". 090126 broadbandreports.com
  16. ^ "What are the differences between PVC, riser and plenum rated cables? - Ask or Answer Questions on Computers & Technology, Ask & Read old Answers on Computers & Technology - ibibo sawaal". 090126 sawaal.ibibo.com

Further reading