Jump to content

Alexandrine grammarians

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Alexandrian grammarian)

The Alexandrine grammarians were philologists and textual scholars who flourished in Hellenistic Alexandria in the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE, when that city was the center of Hellenistic culture. Despite the name, the work of the Alexandrine grammarians was never confined to grammar, and in fact did not include it, since grammar in the modern sense did not exist until the first century BCE.[1] In Hellenistic and later times, grammarian refers primarily to scholars concerned with the restoration, proper reading, explanation and interpretation of the classical texts, including literary criticism. However unlike Atticism, their goal was not to reform the Greek in their day.[2]

The Alexandrine grammarians undertook the critical revision of the works of classical Greek literature,[3] particularly those of Homer, and their studies were profoundly influential,[4] marking the beginning of the Western grammatical tradition.[5] From the beginning, a typical custom, and methodological bias of this tradition was to focus their commentary and analysis on de-contextualized sentences.[6][5]

Notable members

[edit]

Important members of the Alexandrian grammarians included:

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • Cruttwell, Charles Thomas (1877). "A History of Roman Literature: From the Earliest Period to the Death of Marcus Aurelius". Archived from the original on 2008-12-02. Retrieved 2008-03-30.
  • Forbes, P. B. R. (July 1933). "Greek Pioneers in Philology and Grammar". The Classical Review. 47 (3). Cambridge University Press: 105–112. doi:10.1017/s0009840x00062028. JSTOR 699069. S2CID 161911026.
  • Frede, Michael (1987). "The Origins of Traditional Grammar". Essays in Ancient Philosophy. U. of Minnesota Press. pp. 338–359. ISBN 978-0-8166-1275-8.
  • Harris, Roy (1981). The Language Myth. London: Duckworth.
  • Thogmartin, Clyde (February 1984). "Tense, Aspect, and Context in French Narrative". The French Review. 57 (3): 344–349. JSTOR 392746.