Twentieth Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka

The 20th Amendment (20A) to the Constitution of Sri Lanka was passed on 22 October 2020 by the 225-member Sri Lankan Parliament. 156 voted in favor, 65 voted against and four abstained from the vote.

The 20th Amendment became a subject of political controversy when political activists, civil societies, and members of the international community expressed concerns over its bias towards the Rajapaksa family. Critics denounced the amendment as a "constitutional bombshell", deeming it a violation of the Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka.

The amendment reversed most of the reforms and amendments that were introduced by the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka in 2015. The 20th Amendment reinstated most of the constitutional powers to the President that were previously abolished with the 19th Amendment. The 19th Amendment was the first instance in Sri Lanka where executive power was equally shared by the President and the cabinet.

The 20th Amendment was a frequent political objective of ruling party Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna and Gotabaya Rajapaksa administration, which recorded landslide victories in both 2019 Sri Lankan presidential elections, as well as 2020 Sri Lankan parliamentary election. On 22 October 2020, the amendment was successfully passed in the parliament with a ⅔ majority in the parliament.

Background

Under the Soulbury Constitution (which consisted of The Ceylon Independence Act of 1947 and The Ceylon Orders in Council 1947), Sri Lanka was then known as Ceylon.

The Soulbury Constitution provided a parliamentary form of Government for Ceylon and for a Judicial Service Commission and a Public Service Commission. Minority rights were safeguarded by Article 29 (2) of the Constitution. The Governor-General, the Senate and the House of Representatives exercised legislative power. The House of Representatives consisted of 101 Members. 95 of the House's members were were elected by universal suffrage, and six were nominated by the Governor-General. The total number was increased to 151 by the 1959 Delimitation Commission.

The S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike government set up a joint Select Committee of the Senate and the House of Representatives to consider a revision of the constitution on 10 January 1958, but the Committee was unable to come to a final conclusion (on account of the propagation of Parliament on 23 May 1959).

A similar attempt by the Dudley Senanayake Government was failed due to such a propagation on 22 June 1968 too.

History

Drafting

The amendment replaced the 19th amendment to the constitution of Sri Lanka. In addition, the amendment reintroduced some enactments in the Eighteenth amendment to the constitution of Sri Lanka and some of the reforms of the 1978 constitution. It was earlier revealed that the proposed bill of the 20th amendment would not require a referendum and instead could be enacted with a two-thirds of majority among MPs in the parliament.

The 20th amendment enhanced the executive powers to the President of the country. In addition, the president was given the authority to dissolve the parliament after one year. The proposed 20th amendment weakened he powers of Prime minister's office and cabinet. In addition, the President could use his executive and constitutional powers to appoint any person to the government offices in his sole discretion without having the need of getting consent from members of parliament.

On 22 September 2020, parties were given a seven day window in which they could challenge the amendment in the apex court after the presenting of the bill in the parliament.

Timeline

On 6 August 2020, Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna emerged victorious in the parliamentary election to form a stable government. Soon after the election, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa approved the cabinet to draft the 20th amendment.

On September 2020, the proposed amendment was published in the government gazette.

On 3 September 2020, the proposed amendment was made publically available.

On 22 September 2020, the draft bill of the amendment was presented in the parliament for the first reading in front of MPs.

On 22 September 2020, Attorney-at-Law Indika Gallage filed a petition challenging the draft bill in the Supreme Court.

On 29 September 2020, the Supreme Court began hearing of petitions against the 20th amendment.

On 2 October 2020, Attorney General Dappula de Livera revealed that only Supreme Court of the country can decide the fate of the 20th amendment whether it should be passed through a public referendum or ⅔ of majority in the parliament. On 5 October 2020 - Supreme Court concluded oral submissions on hearing petitions challenging the 20th amendment to the constitution.

On 20 October 2020, Supreme Court gave verdict that certain clauses in the amendment must require a public referendum instead of a parliamentary majority. On 20 October 2020 - The determination regarding the Supreme Court rule was read by the speaker of Parliament Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena.

A two-day debate on the 20th Amendment to the Constitution in the parliament was held on 21 and 22 October, during a meeting at the Committee on Parliamentary Business.

On 21 October 2020, Minister of Justice Ali Sabry presented the original 20th amendment for the second reading in the parliament. The debate regarding the constitution commenced in parliament for second consecutive day.

On 22 October 2020, the bill was passed in the parliament with a two-thirds majority.

Supreme Court's ruling

The draft amendment was challenged in the Supreme Court on the grounds that certain clauses in their present form were inconsistent with Article 3 and Article 4 of the constitution. Around 39 petitions were filed by the opposition parties including Tamil National Alliance, Samagi Jana Balawegaya, and civil societies against the approval of the 20th amendment in the Supreme Court. On 20 October 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that certain sections of the proposed bill should require a referendum.

Reactions

The opposition party Samagi Jana Balawegaya criticised the amendment and termed the government as paving way for dictatorship instead of being autocracy. The opposition party leader Sajith Premadasa claimed that the draft bill would not comply with public mandate given to the government and also further insisted that he wouldn't support for the bill to be passed in the parliament. He also suggested that the government should pass a modern health bill to tackle the second wave of infections due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Sri Lanka instead of passing an "anti-democratic" amendment.

Some Buddhist monks who were allies of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party also stated opposition towards the amendment, stating that it would be a deal leading to a death blow to the democracy of Sri Lanka. Catholic bishops also shown their opposition against the proposed amendment.

Tamil minority political parties including the Tamil National Alliance accused the Sri Lankan government of gaining dictatorship through passing of 20th amendment. Senior political scientist Jayadeva Uyangoda condemned the government decision to pass 20A calling it as a constitutional bombshell.