Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors
Please submit error reports only for content that is currently or will imminently appear on the Main Page. For general discussion about the Main Page, kindly use its talk page. |
National variations of the English language have been extensively discussed previously:
|
To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.
- Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
- Offer a correction if possible.
- References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
- Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 08:08 on 20 November 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
- Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
- Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems because this is not a talk page. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
- No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
- Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
- Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.
Errors in the summary of today's or tomorrow's featured article
Errors in In the news
Template:ITN-Update In the item on the shooting in the Parliament Buildings, "Parliament" by itself doesn't read right. It's not used in Canada to mean the Parliament Buildings but in the actual House of Commons and Senate as a joint body; not in its antechambers and offices and Library; I hadn't heard that he'd made it past, or even near, the doors of the Commons or Seante; not sure where exactly it was but sounds like in the long hallway near the Library of Parliament that he was brought down; so "in the Parliament Buildings" (in the Centre Block of the Parliament Buildings, technically). I know compression is needed in headline summaries, but "and shots are fired in Parliament" should be "and shots are fired in the Parliament Buildings". Or leave out the "the" headline style if you must "and shots are fired in Parliament Building(s).Skookum1 (talk) 14:25, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- I've specified in the Centre Block building, as in the article. How does that look now? Yngvadottir (talk) 15:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, the lower-case "building" isn't right; if you're mentioning the Centre Block it should be "the Centre Block of the Parliament Buildings".Skookum1 (talk) 04:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- I would agree if it were "buildings", but that would be unnecessarily long, IMO. However, another admin may want to make the further change. Do you think it's important enough to emphasize that there are several buildings in the complex? Yngvadottir (talk) 12:15, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, the lower-case "building" isn't right; if you're mentioning the Centre Block it should be "the Centre Block of the Parliament Buildings".Skookum1 (talk) 04:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Consider mentioning that the China moon mission is unmanned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.180.202.51 (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Botswana - That is a terrible blurb. The bold article is a largely unsourced BLP which hasn't even been updated to reflect the event in question, and it's the wrong article to bold anyway, because the entire blurb is wrong, it wasn't a presidential election, it was a parliamentary one. The original blurb may not have been perfect, but it was a whole lot better than the current one. C628 (talk) 20:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- Re-bolded. Alternatively suggest a blurb that actually works rather than just say "I don't like it". The Rambling Man (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- The Botswana Democratic Party maintains its majority in Parliament after the general election. Although to be fair the party article isn't a whole lot better. C628 (talk) 20:53, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- So Khama wasn't re-elected as president? Or "re-sworn in"? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- No, not yet. The election only was for MPs, who then select the president. C628 (talk) 21:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- So Khama wasn't re-elected as president? Or "re-sworn in"? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- The Botswana Democratic Party maintains its majority in Parliament after the general election. Although to be fair the party article isn't a whole lot better. C628 (talk) 20:53, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- Re-bolded. Alternatively suggest a blurb that actually works rather than just say "I don't like it". The Rambling Man (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
monkeys loved ice scream lol lol lol hahqaha — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.110.193.207 (talk) 23:40, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
DYK queue status
Current time: 08:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC) Update frequency: once every 24 hours Last updated: 8 hours ago() |
- "... that psychologist Jonas Wood explores ..." uses a false title. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- Is your problem just with false titles on the MP, or across Wikipedia. It is a commonly used construction, present in many DYKs, and plenty of GAs and FAs. Harrias talk 07:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- It's across Wikipedia. I have been told in many FACs and GANs to avoid it. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- How would you suggest altering this hook: simply remove "psychologist", or find some other way to work it in? Harrias talk 08:12, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- The standard way is to simply say "the psychologist". The Rambling Man (talk) 08:18, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- The set had just rotated off the Main Page. However, I believe this is basically a British usage rule, and Jonas Wood is American. I did change it for Otto Lucas in the current set, because he worked in the UK. Yngvadottir (talk) 12:17, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- It's a rule, sort of, in U.S. English too, but constantly ignored. Sca (talk) 15:22, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, indeed. So often ignored, yet the ignorance of others allows the journalistic bent to be propagated, all for the worse. Still, this is American Wikipedia, after all. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:46, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- It's a rule, sort of, in U.S. English too, but constantly ignored. Sca (talk) 15:22, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Errors in today's or tomorrow's On this day
Errors in today's or tomorrow's featured picture
Please report any such problems or suggestions for improvement at the General discussion section of Talk:Main Page.