Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-03-01/Community view: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
re Clarice Phelps
 
non-binary
Line 6: Line 6:
: Likewise the [[Template:Did you know nominations/Clarice Phelps|nomination for Did You Know]] is mired in noisy and unpleasant discussion, quite unlike the usual process. The extent to which such subjects attract hostile attention is quite remarkable so thanks to [[User:Megalibrarygirl|Megalibrarygirl]] for her timely article about this.
: Likewise the [[Template:Did you know nominations/Clarice Phelps|nomination for Did You Know]] is mired in noisy and unpleasant discussion, quite unlike the usual process. The extent to which such subjects attract hostile attention is quite remarkable so thanks to [[User:Megalibrarygirl|Megalibrarygirl]] for her timely article about this.
: [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 15:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
: [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 15:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
[[File:KayMcNultyAlyseSnyderSisStumpDifferentialAnalyzer.jpg|thumb|As a counterpoint to the ENIAC photo, these three women operating a [[differential analyser]] are an early example of [[analog computing|non-binary]] people in computing.{{right|-[[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]]}}]]

Revision as of 17:39, 2 March 2020

Discuss this story

Nominated for deletion yet again

.

  • Clarice Phelps is another prominent example. The repeated deletion of this black woman has generated adverse media coverage such as this. The good news is that the public are now allowed to read about this person again, following a recent appeal at Deletion review. But there are still attempts to make her invisible again.
Her image (right) is displayed as public domain by both Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the Department of Energy, but we now have vexatious attempts to argue otherwise – novel arguments not previously presented for our many other good faith images from that laboratory.
Likewise the nomination for Did You Know is mired in noisy and unpleasant discussion, quite unlike the usual process. The extent to which such subjects attract hostile attention is quite remarkable so thanks to Megalibrarygirl for her timely article about this.
Andrew🐉(talk) 15:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As a counterpoint to the ENIAC photo, these three women operating a differential analyser are an early example of non-binary people in computing.