Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy/Archive 48) (bot
Line 60: Line 60:


There is a parallel RfC at [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: community general sanctions and deletions]] that should not be confused with this one about the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 07:41, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
There is a parallel RfC at [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: community general sanctions and deletions]] that should not be confused with this one about the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 07:41, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

== i made an edit before i've seen it was nominee for delectation.. too bad ==

i am having problem going in too a talk page i always going in at the wrong move i alway edit the talk source

Revision as of 13:41, 28 May 2019

WikiProject iconDeletion (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Deletion, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.

I have created an RfC at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: community general sanctions and deletions that proposes amending Wikipedia:General sanctions#Community sanctions to say that deletions under community general sanctions that bypass deletion discussion must meet the requirements for speedy deletion and be reviewable at deletion review. Cunard (talk) 09:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I created a petition at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Petition to amend the arbitration policy: discretionary sanctions and deletions that proposes amending Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy to say that the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions must not authorise the deletion, undeletion, moving, blanking, or redirection of pages in any namespace. The petition part of the arbitration policy amendment process requires a petition signed by at least one hundred editors in good standing. The ratification process then begins and requires majority support with at least one hundred editors voting in support.

There is a parallel RfC at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: community general sanctions and deletions that should not be confused with this one about the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions. Cunard (talk) 07:41, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i made an edit before i've seen it was nominee for delectation.. too bad

i am having problem going in too a talk page i always going in at the wrong move i alway edit the talk source