Jump to content

User talk:Fæ: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
subst
August 2019: reply to Fæ
Line 47: Line 47:
:{{ping|Cullen328}} Hi, could you clarify whether this applies to the Arbcom clarification request which is about the misuse of anti-transgender language when it has literally nothing to do with article content or improvement, nor the two articles which were the only diffs raised in the thread about bullying that morphed into vote on ANI?
:{{ping|Cullen328}} Hi, could you clarify whether this applies to the Arbcom clarification request which is about the misuse of anti-transgender language when it has literally nothing to do with article content or improvement, nor the two articles which were the only diffs raised in the thread about bullying that morphed into vote on ANI?
: I am also interpreting this TBan as not being a ban against creating or adding to biographies. As listed on my user page I have focused on women's biographies in the last couple of years, and the fact that a person has a gender does not mean these articles are about "human sexuality", nor are any of the articles I have created a matter of dispute (of any kind). Naturally I would respect the TBan and refuse to engage, if there were a dispute that was specifically about "human sexuality" even where the article has nothing to do with this topic per se. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ#top|talk]]) 14:11, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
: I am also interpreting this TBan as not being a ban against creating or adding to biographies. As listed on my user page I have focused on women's biographies in the last couple of years, and the fact that a person has a gender does not mean these articles are about "human sexuality", nor are any of the articles I have created a matter of dispute (of any kind). Naturally I would respect the TBan and refuse to engage, if there were a dispute that was specifically about "human sexuality" even where the article has nothing to do with this topic per se. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ#top|talk]]) 14:11, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
::You may work on biographies that have nothing to do with human sexuality or gender identity. Please be aware that the topic ban will be broadly construed. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 15:34, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:35, 12 August 2019

We are changing the future - March 4, 2019

This list is an analysis checking for which articles exist for trans athletes based on a newspaper article spotted in another place... a prompt to create a few...

  1. Ignacia Livingstone
  2. Cyclists Jillian Bearden  Done and Rachel McKinnon
  3. the volleyball players Omaira Perdomo and Tiffany Abreu;
  4. the great chess teacher Natalia Parés Vives;  Done
  5. golfer Mianne Bagger;
  6. soccer player Jaiyah Saelua;
  7. softball player Pat Cordova-Goff;
  8. Christina Ginther American football;
  9. Catherine McGregor, in cricket;
  10. Fallon Fox, in UFC;
  11. Nong Rose in Muay Thai
  12. Louise Sand, Swedish handbolist
  13. New Zealander Laurel Hubbard
  14. Greco-Roman wrestler Mack Beggs,
  15. Chris Mosier first transsexual man to be part of the male duathlon team in the United States
  16. Jessica Millamán

-- (talk) 19:14, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

3RR violation

I realize I applied 1RR (per your request), but this does not give you an extra one revert beyond three reverts in 24 hours. (one, two, three, four). Please take the opportunity to self-revert. El_C 21:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • @El C:, I was mis-thinking 3RR, as I had just added the material in question, so this was one revert. I see now that it is any revert. Thanks for pointing it out. By the way, how can we see that 1RR applies? -- (talk) 21:44, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I must have automatically ignored it, that's a really bad habit! I'll add a note to the talk page, others may want to give feedback on the protection. -- (talk) 21:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Report

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Cosmic Sans (talk) 22:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

As a result of a community discussion at WP:ANI, your topic ban from human sexuality, broadly construed, has been reinstated. For the sake of clarity, this includes all articles and other pages having to do with transgender topics and issues. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:05, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cullen328: Hi, could you clarify whether this applies to the Arbcom clarification request which is about the misuse of anti-transgender language when it has literally nothing to do with article content or improvement, nor the two articles which were the only diffs raised in the thread about bullying that morphed into vote on ANI?
I am also interpreting this TBan as not being a ban against creating or adding to biographies. As listed on my user page I have focused on women's biographies in the last couple of years, and the fact that a person has a gender does not mean these articles are about "human sexuality", nor are any of the articles I have created a matter of dispute (of any kind). Naturally I would respect the TBan and refuse to engage, if there were a dispute that was specifically about "human sexuality" even where the article has nothing to do with this topic per se. Thanks -- (talk) 14:11, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You may work on biographies that have nothing to do with human sexuality or gender identity. Please be aware that the topic ban will be broadly construed. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 15:34, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]