Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James J. Kenney: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:33, 14 May 2015

James J. Kenney

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person Zackmann08 (talk) 05:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - —Мандичка^YO 😜 05:49, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's very convincing reasoning. EEng (talk) 05:56, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep [1] [2] [3] [4], plus the newspaper obit from which the article is taken. EEng (talk) 05:56, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Being mentioned is not sufficient; the death notice is typically considered a standard mention. Please see WP:GNG; significant, long-term coverage in multiple sources is required. The article has a single reference with no title - is that the obituary? I have no way of seeing the Berkeley Daily Gazette, March 24-27, 1916. —Мандичка^YO 😜 07:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable certainly in local history. Refs are not numerous, but exist. Tmangray (talk) 07:01, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Individual seems inherently notable and above refs further demonstrate this. Nominator hasn't offered any reasoning to suggest non-notability. --Non-Dropframe _talk 07:22, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Non-dropframe: Nobody is inherently notable. "Non-notable person" is shorthand in this part of Wikipedia to indicate the subject does not meet WP:GNG. That's all the reason necessary. Anyone who counters that must provide solid evidence that the person meets the stated requirements. Unfortunately not a single reference listed above comes close to proving notability. Please review the requirements; if you can find better references, please post them here. —Мандичка^YO 😜 07:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ::That's very convincing reasoning. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 05:56, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' [https://books.google.com/books?id=gvA9AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA232] [https://books.google.com/books?id=JX5VAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PA24] [https://books.google.com/books?ei=uTVUVZRgi8mwBYLDgfgJ&id=zdM1AQAAMAAJ&dq=james+kenney] [https://books.google.com/books?id=2O04AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA66], plus the newspaper obit from which the article is taken. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 05:56, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
-::Being mentioned is not sufficient. Please see [[WP:GNG]]; significant coverage in multiple sources is required. The article has a single reference with no title - is that the obituary? I have no way of seeing the ''Berkeley Daily Gazette, March 24-27, 1916''. [[User:Wikimandia|<font color="#0066cc">—'''''Мандичка'''''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Wikimandia|<font color="#6600cc">'''''YO'''''</font>]]</sup> 😜 07:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
+::Being mentioned is not sufficient; the death notice is typically considered a standard mention. Please see [[WP:GNG]]; significant, long-term coverage in multiple sources is required. The article has a single reference with no title - is that the obituary? I have no way of seeing the ''Berkeley Daily Gazette, March 24-27, 1916''. [[User:Wikimandia|<font color="#0066cc">—'''''Мандичка'''''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Wikimandia|<font color="#6600cc">'''''YO'''''</font>]]</sup> 😜 07:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' Notable certainly in local history.  Refs are not numerous, but exist. [[User:Tmangray|Tmangray]] ([[User talk:Tmangray|talk]]) 07:01, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' Individual seems inherently notable and above refs further demonstrate this. Nominator hasn't offered any reasoning to suggest non-notability. <font color="gray">--</font>[[User:Non-dropframe|<font color="Orange">Non-Dropframe</font>]] [[User talk:Non-dropframe|<font color="Green"><u><sub>talk</sub></u></font>]] 07:22, 14 May 2015 (UTC)