Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Trump Street: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
+
self-censorship
Line 25: Line 25:
* I remember an Arbcom case that resulted from a “joke” about Trump. I would ask the nominator to rethink this. [[User:Mr Ernie|Mr Ernie]] ([[User talk:Mr Ernie|talk]]) 18:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
* I remember an Arbcom case that resulted from a “joke” about Trump. I would ask the nominator to rethink this. [[User:Mr Ernie|Mr Ernie]] ([[User talk:Mr Ernie|talk]]) 18:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
::Wow! That was fast! [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 19:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
::Wow! That was fast! [[User:EEng#s|<b style="color: red;">E</b>]][[User talk:EEng#s|<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b>]] 19:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
:::[[Self-censorship|"In authoritarian countries, creators of artworks may remove material that their government might find controversial"]]. Is that what we've been reduced to? —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 20:07, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:07, 9 January 2018

Trump Street

  • Comment: The hook plays on the tendency in US English to drop the "street" qualifiers (cf: Haight-Ashbury) to be grammatically correct.

Created by Edwardx (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Ritchie333 (talk) at 14:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC).

  • Brilliant hook, which meets the length requirement. Accepting subscription-based source on good faith. ceranthor 16:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
  • I tried to think of something like ... that Trump's path to King runs through Russia, but I couldn't make it work and anyway there's no way to top the original hook. I bow down to its author. When it appears, beware of fools looking for excuses to pull it. EEng 18:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
  • I remember an Arbcom case that resulted from a “joke” about Trump. I would ask the nominator to rethink this. Mr Ernie (talk) 18:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Wow! That was fast! EEng 19:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
"In authoritarian countries, creators of artworks may remove material that their government might find controversial". Is that what we've been reduced to? —David Eppstein (talk) 20:07, 9 January 2018 (UTC)