User talk:Cedric tsan cantonais

Welcome!

Hello, Cedric tsan cantonais! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 22:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Fair use images outside of articles

Please refrain from adding images used under a claim of fair use (usually referred to as "non-free" on Wikipedia) to pages other than articles. Please see WP:NFCC#9 for the rule. All non-free images in any page that is not in article space are to be summarily removed. --B (talk) 02:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Captains

If you want one team in your league to be decorated differently than others, feel free to. Please don't push your preference on other leagues. Discuss. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Mein Herr, I can't believe you're willing to bend in to those irrelevant North American rules. Still, if you want me to discuss, I'll do it.Cedric tsan cantonais 16:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

First, they're not rules, they're conventions. Not all European teams decorate their rosters with captains.

Second, you would have to prove that the individual you're decorating with the captaincy is actually the captain. http://www.whitecapsfc.com/wfc2/wfc2-players does not list the captain.

Third, yes, you should discuss. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

IIHF archived articles

thought I would let you know that the issue you had is browser related, if you access the same page with IE or Chrome wikipedia will have no trouble with the URL. I ran into the same issue previously and there is a simple fix in the script of the address but I forget what it is. If I remember I will let you know.18abruce (talk) 00:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

here it is, look in your address, replace [tt_news] with %5Btt_news%5D. It will link just fine. I do believe an article about world girls day is merited, while an article on the the vancouver angels is not though, good luck.18abruce (talk) 00:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Cedric tsan cantonais. You have new messages at Walter Görlitz's talk page.
Message added 02:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi. I realize you've already received complaints about this, but I make one last request here. Wikipedia:Signatures states that the purpose of signatures are to identify you as a user and your contributions to Wikipedia, and that in general, anything that is not allowed in a user name should not be used in a signature either. The username policy prohibits disruptive usernames that are likely to offend other contributors, making harmonious editing difficult or impossible.

Your signature currently says "CÉDRIC TSÄN CANTONAIS SAYS NO TO I.P. EDITS!". This signature is not in line with the purpose of signatures, as it seems to promote a particular point of view that you have—that editors should not be allowed to contribute with an IP address. Current English Wikipedia policy and practice allows for anonymous IP editing (and remember, IPs are human too). This means that your signature automatically puts you in unnecessary conflict with our anonymous editors—a violation of WP:CIVIL. In other words, having your signature as it is right now will make participating in harmonious discussions with anonymous editors very difficult, as we already see on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vancouver Angels (Ice Hockey). As a result, you need to change your signature. I have no problem with you proposing to the English Wikipedia community that anonymous editing be disabled, but your signature is not the place to do it. Mz7 (talk) 04:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VancouverAngels.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VancouverAngels.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Diacritics discussion

PBS, Fyunck, WhatamIdoing and a few others aside the encyclopedia accepts and uses diacritics. Do you know of any article which doesn't? Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Just as a note Cedric, referring to an agreement you dislike as "BIGOTED", and whining about "ANTI-DIACRITIC CRUSADES" when you are on a "pro-diacritic crusade" yourself is both hypocritical and bordering on a personal attack. If you wish to build support for your position, try behaving like an adult. Resolute 15:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Wrong again. It's not me on a "pro-diacritic crusade". It's just that non-English names shall not be governed by English-centric rules like that bigoted "Convention №. 2". Or do you think the Wikipedia is still in ye olde colonial days, when the British Privy Council could veto a Québec court ruling?

Also, just in case you didn't notice, good sir, the use of diacritics is more serious than rock bands adding diacritics to their names, and we the supporters of diacritics bear twice the pressure you opposers bear and do more than twice the research you opposers do because we need to ensure that the diacritics are used correctly and properly. In most cases, that means having to venture into territories as unfamiliar as the Mariana Trench or Olympus Mons. Any false move would be ground for opposers to pick us up. If you would ever think that eliminating diacritics is even one thousandth as gutsy as venturing into unfamiliar territories like the Polypterī, please think again. Cédric ^{SAYS NO to anti-diacritic crusades!} 07:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Dude, I support the use of diacritics. But you are behaving like an immature child throwing a tantrum, and it makes it damn hard to want to side with you on anything. Zealots such as yourself are a net negative to this project. Resolute 15:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Let's make a deal here: I'll hold back all my future offences if you, good sir, openly state that you oppose "Convention №. 2". And don't worry, I'm not about to start any editing war unless someone else starts and editing war against my constructive edits. Cédric ^{SAYS NO to anti-diacritic crusades!} 22:54, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

I haven't personally enforced that convention in years. But I appreciate your willingness to tone it down a little. Resolute 23:26, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your attention please

Hi. I added subsections at my proposal to differentiate between opposition on technical grounds, and opposition in principal. Would you please move your opposition to the most suitable section? Thanks. fredgandt 09:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Whitecaps FC 2. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Cedric tsan cantonais. You have new messages at Laberkiste's talk page.
Message added 05:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Laber□^T 05:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi

Hijiri88 pinged me in that talk going on at ANI. I can't really follow the detail of what's going on and I don't know the context and haven't been watching this. I am sure Hijiri88 is joking not attacking me - I like Hijiri88 was one of the editors supporting the restoration of Czech and so on names after efforts to "Anglicize" them by a minority of Tennis editors. And again restoration of Vietnam articles after a similar actions by one editor who moved the entire Vietnam article corpus. And has since been banned. I cannot follow what Walter Görlitz position or lack of position is, but don't see a problem. I suggest just smoothing it all over if that is possible. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:24, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Diacritics

Hardly going to argue much about the wording of your own template, but what conventions are you citing? The wording change in question would address them if they exist, and any that people would want to impose. I.e., "any" is more inclusive.  :-)  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  23:13, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption, following the clear consensus here. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

 ‑ Iridescent 20:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

@Iridescent:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cedric tsan cantonais (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was not guilty of either violation that Walter Görlitz accused me of. I have not attacked anyone since April (and of course not in the edit in which Walter Görlitz wrongfully accused me of attacking an IP) and I did not blank any page. All the accused "battleground behaviours" are the direct and indisputable result of Walter Görlitz's and Hijiri88's wrongful and possibly malicious accusations. If this was a retro-active punishment for April, then so be it. But Walter Görlitz must go down for wrongfully accusing me of attacking an IP while all I did was saying "suspected vandalism" due to the fact that the IP did not add any references to his/her edit. Also, I refused to be tried by popularity contests. I demand an arbitration. I aslo demand that Walter Görlitz and Hijiri88 recuse themselves from the arbitration. —Cédric the wrongfully recused 22:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC) 21:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The consensus is pretty conclusive, and you have not addressed your behaviour that led to it. And you don't get to simply refuse to accept consensus here. You can try contacting the Arbitration Committee if you really want to (link below), but I wouldn't get your hopes up unless you change your approach. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I couldn't care less who's right and who's wrong, and have no interest in your case; what I see is that every single person to express an opinion regarding you has concurred that the most appropriate course of action is an indefinite block. Unfortunately, you don't get to "refuse to be tried by popularity contests", since consensus is a core Wikipedia policy; if you just want a free space to vent about how you're right and every other person in the world is wrong, I'm sure you can manage to locate Wordpress. If you insist the arbitration committee get involved, fill your boots, but I'll warn you they'll take a considerably less lenient view of this situation than I have; you'll note that at present you're still able to post unblock requests, still able to comment on your own talk page, still able to send emails and only blocked indefinitely, not permanently. ‑ Iridescent 22:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Then so be it. Sonner or later I'll locate an admin who will take another look on the case. Thank you for your time. Cédric the wrongfully recused 22:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Cedric, if it's really your desire to ever contribute to Wikipedia again, and all the stuff about diacritics and edit summaries is a big misunderstanding, then please STOP NOW. You're now WP:FORUMSHOPPING and hoping for a WP:WHEELWAR, and that's not going to happen. Think about what you have done to lead to this block, and when you can make another unblock request acknowledging that -- no sooner than one week from now -- make another request. If you instead post another request like the one above, then that will likely be the end of your participation here permanently. EEng 22:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)