User talk:Seicer

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia as of October 2009.

FYI

Thought you might be interested in this: [1]. I advised him to consider taking it down [2], his response was this [3] and this [4]. Thanks for your help at the Bobbi Kristina Brown article (and everything else peripheral), by the way. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

More power to him :) seicer | talk | contribs 01:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Lol. Have a good one,-- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for taking care of the IP from AN/I. BMK (talk) 03:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

No problem :) seicer | talk | contribs 14:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Protection of ISIL

Just checking you are aware you just shortened the duration of the semiprotection for ISIL. John Smith the Gamer (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Odd. It also didn't set my pending change modification via TW, so I've fixed both. The page protection now extends to the original duration, and the pending change modification lasts for one year. seicer | talk | contribs 14:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Alternate account?

Is this User:Herr_Seicler you with an alternate account? I noted this edit [5] and found it to be a bit suspicious considering a previous conversation we had here yesterday. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

• I thought alternate account at first except when I viewed the diff it didn't make sense Seicer would intentionally change a working image to a non existing/broken one. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 16:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

I note someone else took care of the edit and the account actually doesn't belong to you. A vandalism report has been filed on Herr Seicler (see here:[6]) and they have been blocked. The report also includes a connection with User:The word randal with a v.. It's up to you, of course, whether or not you want to pursue it, but I have a feeling both accounts belong to a certain sockmaster, someone in particular who is not letting go of an incident that occurred a couple of days ago. A perusal of their edits gives an indication as to their continued anger over the incident. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

No, it's not me. I can take a look at it when I'm near a computer later today. seicer | talk | contribs 18:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for that block

What a nice way of putting it: "You have been blocked from editing for a period of forever." It's nice to have grown-ups in charge. FourViolas (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Forever and ever. seicer | talk | contribs 18:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Please reconsider your block

[7] The editor was correct, not unconstructive and no one informed them of sourcing, edit warring, etc. Edit summaries are not the way to communicate to newbies. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, please lift it. I'm not in the best mood, not fit to edit, but I did it anyway. I'm pretty new, 7-8 months editing, and just tried to find a random warning template. Actually, at first, I thought it was vandalism. The editor was new, and if you see on my page, I'm not doing too good in real life. So I was influenced by that. If you're gonna block someone, block me. Unblock this editor please. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 04:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Already done. Apologies. seicer | talk | contribs 04:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm sorry for incorrectly warning an editor. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 04:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

No, it was my error for being too hasty. Cheers :) seicer | talk | contribs 04:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)