Talk:Margaret Rodgers (deaconess): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Connected editor: I think COI is unlikely |
→Connected editor: not coi |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
It is clear from [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAmandajm&diff=614613210&oldid=614612365 this edit] that the subject of this article was a friend of [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]], the main editor of the article. This is in direct contravention of [[WP:COI]], particularly this sentence: "You should not create or edit articles about yourself, your family or friends.". [[User:Mary IV|Mary IV]] ([[User talk:Mary IV|talk]]) 15:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC) |
It is clear from [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAmandajm&diff=614613210&oldid=614612365 this edit] that the subject of this article was a friend of [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]], the main editor of the article. This is in direct contravention of [[WP:COI]], particularly this sentence: "You should not create or edit articles about yourself, your family or friends.". [[User:Mary IV|Mary IV]] ([[User talk:Mary IV|talk]]) 15:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
:[[User:Mary IV|Mary IV]]: If you reread [[WP:COI]], you see, in boldface, '''when advancing outside interests is more important to an editor than advancing the aims of Wikipedia, that editor stands in a conflict of interest'''. No outside interests are being advanced by this article. I do have concerns regarding [[WP:OWN]], but [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] is an experienced editor and I'm certain that these can be hashed out. I'll add that editing topics that you're passionate about can be difficult, and editing topics where you have expertise can be hugely frustrating (see [[WP:RANDY]]), but neither of these necessarily involve a conflict of interest. [[User:Lesser Cartographies|Lesser Cartographies]] ([[User talk:Lesser Cartographies|talk]]) 18:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC) |
:[[User:Mary IV|Mary IV]]: If you reread [[WP:COI]], you see, in boldface, '''when advancing outside interests is more important to an editor than advancing the aims of Wikipedia, that editor stands in a conflict of interest'''. No outside interests are being advanced by this article. I do have concerns regarding [[WP:OWN]], but [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] is an experienced editor and I'm certain that these can be hashed out. I'll add that editing topics that you're passionate about can be difficult, and editing topics where you have expertise can be hugely frustrating (see [[WP:RANDY]]), but neither of these necessarily involve a conflict of interest. [[User:Lesser Cartographies|Lesser Cartographies]] ([[User talk:Lesser Cartographies|talk]]) 18:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
::Having known the subject, even well, is not a COI, because the warm glow one feels at seeing an appropriate article develop about someone you've known isn't an "outside interest". But it does mean one needs to edit with special care, and as pointed out OWN can be a problem. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 18:39, 27 June 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:39, 27 June 2014
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
 | Biography Unassessed | ||||||
| |||||||
 | Australia Unassessed Low‑importance   | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Connected editor
It is clear from this edit that the subject of this article was a friend of Amandajm, the main editor of the article. This is in direct contravention of WP:COI, particularly this sentence: "You should not create or edit articles about yourself, your family or friends.". Mary IV (talk) 15:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Mary IV: If you reread WP:COI, you see, in boldface, when advancing outside interests is more important to an editor than advancing the aims of Wikipedia, that editor stands in a conflict of interest. No outside interests are being advanced by this article. I do have concerns regarding WP:OWN, but Amandajm is an experienced editor and I'm certain that these can be hashed out. I'll add that editing topics that you're passionate about can be difficult, and editing topics where you have expertise can be hugely frustrating (see WP:RANDY), but neither of these necessarily involve a conflict of interest. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 18:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Having known the subject, even well, is not a COI, because the warm glow one feels at seeing an appropriate article develop about someone you've known isn't an "outside interest". But it does mean one needs to edit with special care, and as pointed out OWN can be a problem. EEng (talk) 18:39, 27 June 2014 (UTC)