Talk:Reed College: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Larry_Sanger (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
regard, or just compared with other bachelor's granting institutions? |
regard, or just compared with other bachelor's granting institutions? |
||
---- |
|||
Yes, according to their literature, ''compared to other liberal arts colleges.'' Compared to all institutions, actually. Have a look: http://www.reed.edu . --[[LMS]] |
|||
Revision as of 07:29, 9 January 2002
This article reads more like a recruitment brochure than an encyclopedia
written with an eye towards neutral-point-of-view.
"nice, quiet", "well-known" and other glowing phrases. I've heard great
things about Reed, true, and know or know of a few alumni, but even so.
As for high-proportions of Ph.D.'s, I believe this is generally true of
small liberal arts colleges.
http://www.lawrence.edu/news/pubs/steitz.shtml
As with all liberal arts colleges, one might question whether they do so
well (assuming that production of Ph.D.s can be defined as "doing well")
because of value-add unique to any college, or because they tend to draw
from a more select pool, academically and economically.
This is all true (the article wasn't NPOV), although Reed does have an unusually high percentage of people who go on to get Ph.D.'s--that is represented as a statistical fact by their literature, anyway. --LMS
From Steitz's article: "small colleges produce about twice as many students
who go on to obtain a Ph.D. in science than do large, distinguished research
universities."
So, is Reed unusual compared with other liberal arts colleges in this
regard, or just compared with other bachelor's granting institutions?
Yes, according to their literature, compared to other liberal arts colleges. Compared to all institutions, actually. Have a look: http://www.reed.edu . --LMS