Bayesian probability: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Dick Beldin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Larry_Sanger (talk) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | Recognizing that different people view the same proposition with different ''degrees of belief'', the concept of ''personal probability'' was championed by [[L. J. Savage]] and [[Bruno deFinetti]] and others such as [[Frank P. Ramsey]]. They created the idea of defining rational belief as an abstraction of betting behavior subject to the constraint that one doesn't want to be inconsistent in his behavior. This approach has been called ''Bayesian'', ''subjective'' or ''personal'' probability. A series of critiques of statistical methods was based on this concept and formed the basis of the debate during the decades of 1950 and 1960. Today, there are a variety of applications of personal probability that have gained wide acceptance. |
||
⚫ | |||
:[[ |
:[[probability axioms]] -- [[frequency probability]] -- [[eclectic probability]] |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Recognizing that different people view the same proposition with different ''degrees of belief'', the concept of |
||
Revision as of 07:43, 30 June 2001
Recognizing that different people view the same proposition with different degrees of belief, the concept of personal probability was championed by L. J. Savage and Bruno deFinetti and others such as Frank P. Ramsey. They created the idea of defining rational belief as an abstraction of betting behavior subject to the constraint that one doesn't want to be inconsistent in his behavior. This approach has been called Bayesian, subjective or personal probability. A series of critiques of statistical methods was based on this concept and formed the basis of the debate during the decades of 1950 and 1960. Today, there are a variety of applications of personal probability that have gained wide acceptance.
back to Probability