Talk:Liberal arts college: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Larry_Sanger (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
And so on. |
And so on. |
||
---- |
|||
Well, I think it's still misleadingly worded. I'll explain in the article itself. --[[LMS]] |
|||
Revision as of 23:35, 8 January 2002
- The term "liberal" in "liberal arts" originally refered to "free men," eg those citizens of the republics of classical antiquity and a generalized education thought to be most proper for these social and political elites.
I've never heard that before. I have always heard that "liberal" in "liberal arts" means essentially "freeing the mind." Do you have some evidence for the above statement? --LMS
That's the way I originally remembered hearing it "education for free men".
So my original reference is, I guess you could say, "oral tradition".
I might have gotten it in this form because Wabash College retains an
all-male student body, and so there has not yet been a need there to change
the definition so much (presumably) to fit gender-inclusive language
appropriate for institutions that switched to (or were founded to provide)
co-education.
For sources located after-the-fact of my entry, try these:
*http://www.google.com/search?q=%22liberal+arts%22+free+men&btnG=Google+Search
*http://www.realuofc.org/libed/adler/wle.html
*http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01760a.htm
*http://www.uca.edu/divisions/academic/libart/dean.htm
And so on.
Well, I think it's still misleadingly worded. I'll explain in the article itself. --LMS